Jump to content

Lakers


kyle021

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, JakePA_Titan said:

Im a Laker fan. I became one the first time I watched Kobe. Had nothing to do with them having the great history, although It made it easier...

What year was that?  Probably right in the middle of their 3 peat LOL

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, abenjami said:

What year was that?  Probably right in the middle of their 3 peat LOL

1996-1997.  They won the championship a few years later.  I'd like to see how many fans will stay on during this period of suckiness.  Pretty obvious that they will suck for a few more years (bad FO/ownership).  They've never done full rebuilds like other teams.  I bet a bunch of those "fans" probably jumped to the Clippers and Warriors bandwagon by now.

Oops..disregard the year thing as I misread Jakes post.  But the rest of the stuff is accurate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, JakePA_Titan said:

No i became a fan before they even acquired Shaq.

Lakers are in a better situation than most that will lose an all time great. They have veey good young players (Russell, Randal, Clarkson) once Kobe is gone it will be easier to attract the top free agents/players.

Lakers wont stay down for long, never do! 

LOL, you are overrating their talent level.  For starters, all 3 of those guys are horrible defenders, especially Randle.  Russell has struggled and been outplayed by other rookies.   And do you really see top players flocking to a rebuilding project, especially given the recent trends of FA (the top guys are now going to winning and well run teams)?  Their talent level sucks and they are nowhere close to what you say they are.  Oh and their coaching and front office pretty much blow.  They need a top down tear down otherwise they'll be stuck in the lower depths of the Western conference for a long time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JakePA_Titan said:

Do you really see rebuilding in the NBA a process as it is in baseball or the NFL? All it takes is one player (a Durant) and your a playoff team.

Yes, players will love to.play in LA once Kobe is gone.

This is essentially Randals first season given he got hurt in game one last year, and yes Russell is still young and raw insome areas. Give them a year or two to grow and grow together. The Lakers will have to find a new identity but give them another top 10 pick, which they should get this year, free money from Kobe and every team gets an extra $20 mill in cap next year. Lakers will have Money to throw out and will be able to offer a bigger contract than most other teams.

Lakers arent in as bad of a shape as the haters woild like to think.

 

It's in between.  Nowhere near as short as the NFL but not as long as MLB.  And the Lakers owe the Sixers their first rounder unless it is in the top 3.  And you just made my point, every team has 20 million extra so why would Durant go to the Lakers who are at the bottom of the West?  And the last part about the Lakers offering a bigger contract (at least on "max players") than most teams is wrong.  The max salary spot is set at a certain number (think it is something like 29.6 million) the only team that will be able to offer Durant (for example) more is OKC because they retain his Bird rights other than that every team offers the same amount assuming they have cap space.  Their cap space can be used to overpay other players though. 

Again, what is the point of playing for the Lakers if they are not good currently?  Shit look at Aldridge, he already has a home in LA but turned down the Lakers because he didn't think they could win and thought their ownership and FO is a damn mess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just like Kyle's homerism, players don't feel the need to play for the Lakers due to it "being the lakers". Their brand image has been absolutely destroyed and are not a hot FA commodity just because people want to play for them. If they want to live in CA there are what seems to be half a dozen better options in that single area, let alone if you want to live on the west coast you can add 20 more options than that on the list of "teams that would be better to play for".

Nobody wants to go to a team as a FA in hopes to turn it around when there is very little promise of them even being better than the competition and no other reason besides the dwindling brand image.

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, JakePA_Titan said:

The West isnt going to be what it is in tso years. Spurs will be losing DuncN, Manu, and Parker, although still youngish) is already falling apart. Leonard and Aldridge will keep them.competitive but they wont be as great in two years. Paul is getting older and the Clippers just arent as good as ppl think. They have age on the roster and Jordan and Blake arent that great to make a team title contenders alone. Zach Randolph will be gone and that will hurt the Grizz big time.Dallas is also aging. Outside of GS and Pelicans and Thunder (if they dont lose both Durant and Westbrook) the future isnt that bright..

I understand its a big if, but its also a possibility LA gets one of Durant or Westbrook, if they do, they are automatically playoff bound. And LA will make ither moves. 

Make sure you come back two years from now to revisit this.

Yeah, so?  The Spurs will still be there because they have a stable FO and coaching situation.  I wouldn't bet against Duncan still playing.  Ginobili not likely to play more than 3 years.  Here's the big flaw in your theory:  When was the last time that a superstar left a team to go to another team without a star (or at least a very good established player)?  The Cavs had Irving when Lebron returned.  The Rockets had Harden to entice Howard to go there.  Those teams you mentioned might fall back but that doesn't mean the Lakers will be the ones to make the jump.  As they are currently constructed they have very little talent.  Minnesota, Denver, Sacramento all have more talent than the Lakers do.  And I wouldn't be surprised if the Rockets contend for a conference title in a few years as well.  

And Durant?  He's a far better bet to go to the Wizards (rumors have been circulating for a while) or the Heat if he doesn't resign with OKC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Durant is from DC, and will either stay in OKC or move back home.   Even if he did go to the Lakers it would not make them an instant contender, as one man can't do it all.  Nor can he carry a team like Lebron can.   Jordan had his Pippen, while Durant has his Westbrook, but the similarities end there. 

Lakers will lose their pick to the Sixers either this year or next.  I believe next year is unprotected.   So they don't have an important rebuilding pick, and they messed up picking Russell when they should have taken Okafor (and probably a few others).   It will be a long rebuild, with maybe only the Nets in worse shape.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It's time to update this now that some new (and hilarious) news has come out.  The Lakers have sent D'Angelo Russell and Julius Randle to the bench.  It's bad enough that Scott doesn't even let Russell finish the games but now he isn't even starting.  They are a rebuilding team.  Play the young players, Byron.

Oh and Kobe Bryant is currently shooting 30.6% and 21.9% on threes.  The MLB average leader last year was Miguel Cabrera of DET at .338.  Can Kobe pass it at the end of the year?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You do realize that the Lakers have had horrible FO/coaching  for the last five years or so?  That is why this is funny because this is just another example of this.

LOL, you're even worse than Kyle on this topic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rns90 said:

You do realize that the Lakers have had horrible FO/coaching  for the last five years or so?  That is why this is funny because this is just another example of this.

LOL, you're even worse than Kyle on this topic.

You'd think a Titan fan would have thicker skin when it comes to losing

Link to post
Share on other sites

That comes with the territory of winning the way they have, unless you are a Kobe or Lakers fan you despise them. The characters and egos on the team the past decade in a half have just been incredible where there is no benefit of the doubt with that franchise. When Brady and BB retires the Pats will get a lot more shit talking than the Lakers can imagine.

It's no different than Miami too, people loved talking shit about their "demise". When you have what the public perceives as cocky assholes fall on their face, they get spat on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...