JLocker10 Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 http://t.co/dAZXOgalmd Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IowaOiler Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 About what I would expect, although I figured Sankey would be 1 and Greene 2. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 About what I would expect, although I figured Sankey would be 1 and Greene 2. Â You'd like to think a 2nd round pick could come in and push out someone like Greene for the job. Â Hope this changes over the course of TC/PS. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
V_Man Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 Alot of this is supposed to motivate certain players to pick it up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omar Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 CB depth really scares me... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 CB depth really scares me... All the real "depth" is listed at 1 CB spot where they can fight for the job across from McCourty. But I'd say we have 4 CBs right now. Not sure who would make it as a 5th CB at this point... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IowaOiler Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 You'd like to think a 2nd round pick could come in and push out someone like Greene for the job. Â Hope this changes over the course of TC/PS. Â Well, in fairness, Greene was a Hawkeye, and IMO, a decent RB when healthy. Â I think having a timeshare between him and Sankey is the ideal scenario for production as well as health, but Sankey should get more touches. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 You'd like to think a 2nd round pick could come in and push out someone like Greene for the job. Â Hope this changes over the course of TC/PS. This is pretty meaningless as of right now. I think they put the veterans over the rookies by default. Denali 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragidealist Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 This is pretty meaningless as of right now. I think they put the veterans over the rookies by default. Â I think this is more solid than that. Â They were reluctant to create this draft previously. So think this is where its at now. Â Â Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragidealist Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 This is pretty meaningless as of right now. I think they put the veterans over the rookies by default.   I think this is more solid than that.  They were reluctant to create this draft previously. So think this is where its at now.    Whisenhunt said Sensabaugh listed ahead of Wreh-Wilson on depth chart because of seniority #Titans  Wyatt   Then again--- I've been less than right before... ;-) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLocker10 Posted August 6, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 (edited) This is pretty meaningless as of right now. I think they put the veterans over the rookies by default. Jim Wyatt @jwyattsports Whisenhunt said Sensabaugh listed ahead of Wreh-Wilson on depth chart because of seniority #Titans  Jim Wyatt @jwyattsports Same rationale with Shonn Greene #Titans Edited August 6, 2014 by JLocker10 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepingTitan Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 That's a shitty looking depth chart. No wonder we get no ESPN love... XAEA12 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omar Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 Well, in fairness, Greene was a Hawkeye, This only hurts your argument... Â I do think Greene is going to surprise some people this year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 Jim Wyatt @jwyattsports Whisenhunt said Sensabaugh listed ahead of Wreh-Wilson on depth chart because of seniority #Titans  Jim Wyatt @jwyattsports Same rationale with Shonn Greene #Titans I think most teams do this unless it's clear that the rookie is going to start right away. Greene has been a good RB in the past and it's entirely reasonable that he could be a starter this year, but the first depth chart really tells is nothing about the position. I expect Sankey to get more snaps, but honestly I think that It will be very much a committee approach. I doubt any of Greene, Sankey, and McCluster get more than 60% of the RB snaps unless there are injury issues. Greene is clearly the best short yardage back, Sankey is presumably the best all around back, and McCluster is the best big play threat. And I can even see Battle being used at times as the back on plays where McCluster or even Sankey gets motioned out of the backfield and split out wide. It will be interesting to see how they balance out using them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLocker10 Posted August 6, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 They've been saying it for months that it will be RBBC Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.