oldschool

You and me both brother.

I disagree. The signed both Wilson and Pollard for a reason.

Good point. If that happens it may be worth taking on Pollard's weaknesses.

Reo and Prag get it and they don't need to regurgitate info from rotoworld, PFF, or waltersfootball in order to do so.

I'll respond later when I'm not driving. Since you are a mental midget I have to spell everything out for you.

Yeah that's it. Keep trying.

You are missing my point. I'm not advocating they blow stupid money in FA. Don't sell me on the plan to address a terrible pass rush is for them to hope a difference maker at DE is there in the first. They are a building a team around a power rush offense that lacks deep threats. That is being paired with a blitzing defense that lacks a pass rush and is weak in coverage. The two systems do not match and reinforces the idea this team is run by idiots.

This is an overly optimistic point of view.

Right. Because we can totally count on rookies starting and being productive from day one. This team is not going to be good next year.

No pass rush and the signing of in the box Safeties doesn't really address this team's biggest weakness. Pass defense.

We better hope like hell the Defense generates turnovers and the offense learns to score quickly. Teams are going to go up and down the field on this defense with the way it's being constructed.

Bean counters always misuse stats.

Did you account for rookie RBs that don't see third down because they need to adjust to the NFL passing game?

You ignore that not all rookie RBs are given the required carries to break 1000 yards.

Actually I do because my wife is a Skins fan and I live in the D.C. area. RG3 had a very good year without question. But people need to put that in context.

Do you have any idea how bad the Giants, Eagles, and Cowboys defenses were this year?

I don't know. I think Luck really tailed off the last 3rd of the season. Of course voters may just hitch their wagon to the 9 game improvement in the win column, I just don't know. If you look deeper than basic stats, RG3 did not have the same impact as Wilson. He played against a group of terrible defenses in the NFC East 6 times. The skins also also played some of the leagues worst defenses out of the division in the Saints and Panthers. To top it off, they only had 3 wins against teams with a winning record. The Seahawks on the other hand play in a tougher division with the 49ers and a very competitive Rams team. They also had 5 wins against teams that won 10 or more games. I like RG3 but if you watched the Skins this year you saw how many of his big TDs were the result of blown coverages or great plays being made by his WRs. I can see it going either way but in a league where VY can win ROY with crap stats, anything can happen.

I think it should be Wilson. he scored 30 total TDs, beat the Packers, 49ers, Patriots, and Bears, made clutch plays down the stretch in numerous big games, and finished with over a 100 passer rating.

Are you sure I said that?

This is a tall order for the Titans anyway you cut it. They do not have good history against the Chargers, specifically in San Diego. They are facing a very good QB with a poor pass rush, and a key part of their defense isn't playing. I understand you are an eternal optimist but don't let that cloud your analysis.

The Titans are going to need a huge game from Wimbley to have a chance. If Rivers has time to throw, he will pick the defense apart.

I was very surprised at the number of Snaps Cook played. He lined up Tight more than a few times which is something he rarely did last year. I'm curious to see if that holds true over the next few games.

It's rare for a TV series to actually do justice to a book series but it's even more rare in the high fantasy setting. I've read the entire series to date and didn't think there was anyway the show would be this good. If you haven't read the books, do your self a favor and do so. It's not an easy read though so be warned.