Jump to content

Argentina's Trump bound for Presidency?


Jamalisms

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 584
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Pure nonsense.  Byrd, Gore and Fulbright were liberal Democrats to name a few.   In fact the more Republican the South has become, the less racist.

“Libertarian”   LOL you fucking suckers 

They're 100% centrists at the least by international standards

Posted Images

21 minutes ago, Justafan said:

They can pass legislation through reconciliation. 

True. It wouldn't be like the original obamacare mandate they were trying to push through the Interstate Commerce Clause and then back through the taxation clause. They would have to be directly upfront that it would be a tax on everyone, which can be passed through Reconcilliation. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

True. It wouldn't be like the original obamacare mandate they were trying to push through the Interstate Commerce Clause and then back through the taxation clause. They would have to be directly upfront that it would be a tax on everyone, which can be passed through Reconcilliation. 

Where are the 60 votes coming from???

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

He's right they could use reconciliation since it would be a pure tax bill and pass it with only 50. It isn't happening, but theoretically he's right. 

You can’t use reconciliation for all of it, which is why they needed 60 votes for Obamacare and then another reconciliation vote to “fix” it. Not everything can get done via reconciliation… including creating a new government healthcare plan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Strunk'sDessert said:

 I'm not discounting your lived experiences at all. You can point to the different countries zeitgeists and point to specific legislatures and their beliefs to point against this, and you'd be correct. 

 

If you were to take the average Dem and have them list out their political beliefs, they'd probably fall center left or center right in terms of political science's definitions and where they land on a spectrum. Based on Bidens record, he's center right based on the definitions of that spectrum. 

 

Disagree with those political scientists and their definitions, but that's what a slew of them over time have decided, although it's ever changing. 

Compared to Sanders, sure, he's a moderate but that lacks context. Compared to Clinton, Obama, and other Democrats before him, he's shifted further left as many leftist ideas have become more and more mainstream in the last few years. He's certainly not center-right in his views - liberal on abortion rights, gun control, immigration, and most social issues. Passed very liberal economic and climate change bills. Was in the administration that ushered in the Affordable Care Act which was the biggest effort towards Universal Healthcare in our lifetimes... the list goes on.

 

He might not be as far left as the really progressive left, but that doesn't make him a true moderate either. Maybe at one time he was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Starkiller said:

You can’t use reconciliation for all of it, which is why they needed 60 votes for Obamacare and then another reconciliation vote to “fix” it. Not everything can get done via reconciliation… including creating a new government healthcare plan.

Pointless argument. The simple fact remains that Democrats aren't passing these rules because they can't and not because they don't want to. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Starkiller said:

You can’t use reconciliation for all of it, which is why they needed 60 votes for Obamacare and then another reconciliation vote to “fix” it. Not everything can get done via reconciliation… including creating a new government healthcare plan.

Here's a really good article I found. 

 

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/3/8/18251707/medicare-for-all-bill-senate-filibuster-budget-reconciliation-byrd-rule

 

It could be passed under Reconciliation theoretically. Some of its exemptions and statutes as currently defined would be stripped, but it could still in theory drop the age of recipients of Medicare to 0. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

8 minutes ago, Justafan said:

Compared to Sanders, sure, he's a moderate but that lacks context. Compared to Clinton, Obama, and other Democrats before him, he's shifted further left as many leftist ideas have become more and more mainstream in the last few years. He's certainly not center-right in his views - liberal on abortion rights, gun control, immigration, and most social issues. Passed very liberal economic and climate change bills. Was in the administration that ushered in the Affordable Care Act which was the biggest effort towards Universal Healthcare in our lifetimes... the list goes on.

 

He might not be as far left as the really progressive left, but that doesn't make him a true moderate either. Maybe at one time he was.

And compared to Europeans he's a conservative. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Justafan said:

Pointless argument. The simple fact remains that Democrats aren't passing these rules because they can't and not because they don't want to. 

Dems can’t pass a lot of things they want to (that are popular with the public) because they don’t have the votes with just a simple majority…

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

Here's a really good article I found. 

 

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/3/8/18251707/medicare-for-all-bill-senate-filibuster-budget-reconciliation-byrd-rule

 

It could be passed under Reconciliation theoretically. Some of its exemptions and statutes as currently defined would be stripped, but it could still in theory drop the age of recipients of Medicare to 0. 

If you’ll recall they tried simply expanding Medicare eligibility under Obama and it couldn’t be done through reconciliation. Lieberman blocked it when they needed his vote. 
 

Now, maybe if there were a standalone bill expanding Medicare to all Americans it would be able to pass through reconciliation, but I have my doubts…

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Starkiller said:

If you’ll recall they tried simply expanding Medicare eligibility under Obama and it couldn’t be done through reconciliation. Lieberman blocked it when they needed his vote. 
 

Now, maybe if there were a standalone bill expanding Medicare to all Americans it would be able to pass through reconciliation, but I have my doubts…

Oh it isn't happening. I'm speaking in theoreticals. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...