Jump to content

Current Depth Chart


BudsOilers

Recommended Posts

Visual illustration of the roster as of now.  Ourlads was the initial source but they have some guys in wrong spots.  I also split out TE into Y and F since they are different positions. 

 

Very clear this will be an offensive driven remainder of the offseason - in terms of the draft primarily but also the third wave of FA and trade market.

 

Red illustrates help needed badly.  Yellow is a questionable/replaceable starter or zero depth. 

 

 

image.png.206b355c05d61d6475dffd71f7f7fc65.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 155
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, Sargo said:

We have so many holes. It’s crazy people think this team can compete.

Which is why they are far more likely to trade down and accumulate more picks than trade their first 2 picks to move up for a player....

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BudsOilers said:

Which is why they are far more likely to trade down and accumulate more picks than trade their first 2 picks to move up for a player....

I hope you’re right. This needs to be the move.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this post. With the FA WR market starting to become more clear, I'd love to see us add a veteran or two to compete with the inevitable high level rookie we draft. 

 

We also desperately need to sign a FA TE. We rely a lot on those players and will be counting on Rader to take a massive step forward. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The FA WR and TE markets are pretty weak.  TE probably has more meat on the bone FA wise at this point but the draft is deeper there than in years.  WR - still watching the Jets situation with Davis as he'd be an obvious plug and play piece if the draft fails to bring a starting outside WR.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FireInTheHole said:

Honestly, a few moves and some leaps forward by second year players, and it’s not as bad as one might think. 
 

There’s potential, but the o-line needs to be shored up. 

They need at least 1, preferably 2 more contributors in the pass game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, FireInTheHole said:

I agree with that, but Tannehill can do some damage if he has protection. Again - that’s assuming the second year guys make some leaps forward. 

Yep. We aren't going to be able to fill all the holes in one off-season. Protection comes first imo unless they project Dilliard to at least be serviceable at LT. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...