Quarterback Sack Responsibility - A Study on why Tannehill is a top 1 QB

[IsntLifeFunny]

12 minutes ago, WG53 said:

Modt sacks eh? @woolfolksunclesuncle can you explain modt sacks to us?

I would like to hear this. 

[woolfolksunclesuncle]

28 minutes ago, WG53 said:

Modt sacks eh? @woolfolksunclesuncle can you explain modt sacks to us?

 

15 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

I would like to hear this. 

 

Of course I can! I believe it was my equally brilliant intellectual peer, Al Einstein who stated, "If you can't make it climax simply, you don't blow it well enough."

 

So, MODT sacks are a complex issue that I like to dumb down for the everyman swine with a basic mnemonic acronym----similar to those each of us learned in middle school (Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally---for the mathematical order of operations, ROY G BIV----for the colors in the color spectrum, DGIWV---for Don't Go In Woolfolk's Van, etc... )

 

MODT sacks are best explained as Money Over Drained Testicle sacks. This helps young students of the night remember that each orgasm given should be compensated. Giving away orgasms makes for happy customers, but homeless providers.

[GOAT9]

Stop making excuses for RT. He is what he is. A game manager. He isnt shitty. He isnt elite. He is good enough with the right pieces. We are fortunate to have a consistent QB. That is all.

[Number9]

49 minutes ago, woolfolksunclesuncle said:

Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally---for the mathematical order of operations, ROY G BIV----for the colors in the color spectrum, DGIWV---for Don't Go In Woolfolk's Van, etc... )

[OILERMAN]

We've seen in the past a lot of people aren't capable of watching the game and assessing what's really going on. This is no different. 

 

I don't need any advanced stats to show me Mariota wouldn't throw the ball and took sacks vs Tannehill being under constant siege behind a terrible pass blocking OL.

 

We heard it was because Fluellan was lined up wide, MM needed to be in a spread shotgun offense calling his own plays etc, the offense will be just as bad under Tannehill.... the stuff of dullards. 

 

Now it's happening again. The same people are going to explain what's happening that couldn't see the most obvious things? I don't think so

[titanruss]

13 hours ago, rns90 said:

I marvel at how some of you can not grasp the basic FACT of the chart; which is the Titans OL sucks ass (at pass blocking) and manage to turn it into something else.  It's really not about Tannehilll and more about the  lack of pass protection, and the eye test also confirms this.

The chart says that Tom Brady - the greatest pocket presence of all time - is responsible for 2/3 of his sacks and ryan Tannehill is responsible for 1/3.... posted by a retard with less followers than my 5th grade cousin. 

The more logical conclusions are that the dude is either a complete retard or got his stats flip flopped completely. 

 

@TheBukafax... yes the #1 QB line did give it away... but once the argument starts and people actually support it.. the troll creates a life of its own. 

[Number9]

I have a stop watch I use watching the games.  They need to protect RT better.  The biggest #1 problem right now is Derrick Henry in out.  JJ is a mirage.  If we can get AJB back, Tannehill will look even better.  

 

The biggest problem on the board is people do not understand the above.  People actually thought we were going to become a better passing offense to make up the loss of Henry.  The OL has had problems all season pass blocking.  They were not great pass blockers w/Henry.  No reason to believe that was going to change just because we needed to rely on the pass more.