Jamalisms Posted December 9, 2018 Author Report Share Posted December 9, 2018 Eh, I've seen 6 in more leagues than 4. Though I prefer 4. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool Posted December 10, 2018 Report Share Posted December 10, 2018 1 hour ago, Jamalisms said: Eh, I've seen 6 in more leagues than 4. Though I prefer 4. Still got my ass kicked either way. TE is killing me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiscotitansfan Posted December 10, 2018 Report Share Posted December 10, 2018 On 12/8/2018 at 2:15 PM, abenjami said: Supply at QB is never high. You've got limited potential trade partners. What are you talking about? Supply at QB is ALWAYS high There are legit studs out there that matter at a lot, but other than those 5 guys there are about 10 that are in a lesser tier then there are about 5-10 after that don't make any difference. Pair that with there are usually 3-5 very promising rookies every year that leaves about 30 QBs who are worth rostering. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
abenjami Posted December 11, 2018 Report Share Posted December 11, 2018 4 hours ago, wiscotitansfan said: What are you talking about? Supply at QB is ALWAYS high There are legit studs out there that matter at a lot, but other than those 5 guys there are about 10 that are in a lesser tier then there are about 5-10 after that don't make any difference. Pair that with there are usually 3-5 very promising rookies every year that leaves about 30 QBs who are worth rostering. It’s not always high in this league with the deep rosters. There’s literally garbage on the waiver wire. You aint winning this league without a solid first or second tier QB. And of your guy gets hurt, there aren’t serviceable ones available to pickup. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted December 11, 2018 Author Report Share Posted December 11, 2018 The depth of QBs available to acquire via trade, because we only start one, is pretty good. I might not even acquire one, as I have Jimmy and then Tannehill and Keenam as a low-end backups, plus may draft one eventually. It's a buyer's market. Almost everybody is pretty well off so unless you're trading for a top end guy, it's not with paying much. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
abenjami Posted December 11, 2018 Report Share Posted December 11, 2018 1 hour ago, Jamalisms said: The depth of QBs available to acquire via trade, because we only start one, is pretty good. I might not even acquire one, as I have Jimmy and then Tannehill and Keenam as a low-end backups, plus may draft one eventually. It's a buyer's market. Almost everybody is pretty well off so unless you're trading for a top end guy, it's not with paying much. For all we know “Jimmy” might be worse than Tannehill and Keenum. And Tannehill was traded for a first round pick not too long ago... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiscotitansfan Posted December 11, 2018 Report Share Posted December 11, 2018 7 hours ago, abenjami said: And Tannehill was traded for a first round pick not too long ago... Who's the retard that did that? If you're trying to generate value for a QB that you're trying to sell, it's not remotely working Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
abenjami Posted December 11, 2018 Report Share Posted December 11, 2018 1 hour ago, wiscotitansfan said: Who's the retard that did that? If you're trying to generate value for a QB that you're trying to sell, it's not remotely working So says the guy with three QB’s on his own roster... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
9 Nines Posted December 11, 2018 Report Share Posted December 11, 2018 This is Mahomes when the league started. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiscotitansfan Posted December 11, 2018 Report Share Posted December 11, 2018 1 hour ago, abenjami said: So says the guy with three QB’s on his own roster... Yeah, because they're so easy to come by If there was a shortage of QB, I wouldn't use valuable resources trying to acquire guys I will never use, instead they are cheap as fuck so you may as well just see if you can upgrade the position over time.... Since QBs are a dime a dozen and the only thing more plentiful is the amount of bench spaces we have it would be dumb not to load up on the position and just draft a QB every other year hoping you eventually hit on that young stud like Mahommes (at this point) that is far from a dime a dozen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted December 11, 2018 Author Report Share Posted December 11, 2018 6 hours ago, wiscotitansfan said: Since QBs are a dime a dozen and the only thing more plentiful is the amount of bench spaces we have it would be dumb not to load up on the position ... You shut your dirty, whorish mouth. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted December 11, 2018 Author Report Share Posted December 11, 2018 I'm gonna treat you like the Jags in 1999. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
9 Nines Posted December 12, 2018 Report Share Posted December 12, 2018 Wilhis: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
abenjami Posted December 12, 2018 Report Share Posted December 12, 2018 34 minutes ago, 9 Nines said: Wilhis: Whatchu talkin bout Wilhis? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
abenjami Posted December 12, 2018 Report Share Posted December 12, 2018 I love that Jamal backed his way into the playoffs and is talking shit to the #1 seed and a former champion. Wisco you better bring your A game and represent this week! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.