TF_Titan Posted May 7, 2014 Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 I think there's zero chance they take a QB at #11 unless they have a "can't miss" grade on Bortles and by some chance he falls to them. I do think there's a very good chance they take one no later than in the 3rd round. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oiler FANatic Posted May 7, 2014 Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 They aren't taking a QB before Saturday Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luvyablue256 Posted May 7, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 They aren't taking a QB before Saturday Put your sig on it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-RAC Posted May 7, 2014 Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 The Titans like both Carr and Bortles enough to take them at #11. But I think they have some defensive players rated higher. So we'll see how it shakes out. Webster would really like to trade back a few spots and then take Carr. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luvyablue256 Posted May 7, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 The Titans like both Carr and Bortles enough to take them at #11. But I think they have some defensive players rated higher. So we'll see how it shakes out. Webster would really like to trade back a few spots and then take Carr. None of the defensive players are going to be as important to the long term success of the team as picking a QB. That's why I think they go QB in round 1. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
N/A Posted May 7, 2014 Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 6. They didn't exercise the 5th year on Locker Not sure that is much of a sign. I think his 5th year would have become guaranteed with an injury, so it would have been very risky based on his history, and as a top 10 pick, his 5th year would be close to what a franchise tag would cost. So it seems better to just use a tag if he has a really good year and won't reach an agreement on a new contract (which based on his personalty, I think he would reach one.) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pat Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 i doubt we know what the front office is doing. hope they do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oiler FANatic Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 That's why I think they go QB in round 1. Luckily we weren't stuck with Manziel at #11! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luvyablue256 Posted May 9, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 Luckily we weren't stuck with Manziel at #11! I will always wonder the true interest in Bortles. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted May 11, 2014 Report Share Posted May 11, 2014 1. Last year, we pretty much knew Warmack would be the first pick. This year, Webster & Wiz are holding everything close to the vest. When they are asked about drafting a QB, they're unusually non-committal. This is likely because they know there will be some level of controversy come Thursday night. 2. They've sniffed WAY too many QBs to not be serious about picking one early. 3. Whisenhunt will not want to waste time on another wait-and-see season with a QB he didn't pick and doesn't fit what he wants to do. 4. Webster has made it clear he wants that extra pick back. If you go QB in round 1 or 2, you're VERY limited with what else you can do without that extra early round pick (OT, DT, etc)....ESPECIALLY in a draft this deep. 5. Next year's QB class is fuckin' putrid. And GM's do look ahead, contrary to what they say in front of a microphone. How'd this work out for ya? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luvyablue256 Posted May 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2014 How'd this work out for ya? We didn't draft early...yet, we drafted one of the better prospects who was projected to go earlier than the 6th round. And traded away a useless 7th rounder to do so. That indicates that QB was a priority in this draft. Maybe not as high as I originally thought, but a priority nonetheless. At the end of the day, this organization has shown that they're prepared to move on from Locker if he takes a midseason vacation again this year. And that hurts your soul. It's unhealthy for you to hold on to such a mediocre QB. Says a lot about what you REALLY want to see from this team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted May 11, 2014 Report Share Posted May 11, 2014 hahaha we traded away a 7th round pick to move up in the 6th for a guy and QB was a "priority" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragidealist Posted May 11, 2014 Report Share Posted May 11, 2014 We didn't draft early...yet, we drafted one of the better prospects who was projected to go earlier than the 6th round. And traded away a useless 7th rounder to do so. That indicates that QB was a priority in this draft. Maybe not as high as I originally thought, but a priority nonetheless. At the end of the day, this organization has shown that they're prepared to move on from Locker if he takes a midseason vacation again this year. And that hurts your soul. It's unhealthy for you to hold on to such a mediocre QB. Says a lot about what you REALLY want to see from this team. LOL!!!! Ok then Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luvyablue256 Posted May 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2014 hahaha we traded away a 7th round pick to move up in the 6th for a guy and QB was a "priority" If it wasn't, they would have picked other players in the 6th and 7th. Stop being a doofus, Reo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted May 11, 2014 Report Share Posted May 11, 2014 If it wasn't, they would have picked other players in the 6th and 7th. Stop being a doofus, Reo. If it was a priority, they would've picked one higher than the 6th. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.