OILERMAN Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 Every team's numbers are inflated over a few games. It doesn't mean they have a terrible rush. That's all I'm saying Find me another team that got half their sack total against 2 teams in 3 games Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WG53 Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 Welp, until you prove it, it is bullshit. You are correct that you don't have to prove anything. But, until you prove it, you don't really have a leg to stand on in terms of the veracity of your statements. We are rehashing. Once again, I've seen a lot of playbooks and am yet to see a 'cover 3 man'. I'll just drop it and hope you prove me wrong. I said it in the other thread that I really was interested to see an actual play with that designation. I'll ask one question and drop it: Are you saying cover 3 man exists as a concept or actual play-call, or both? In terms of concept, yes it exists in terms of underneath coverage (definitely not outside coverage in terms of an actual play-call, even if pattern reading), but I've never seen a play with that designation. You can keep saying it is bs all you like but you are wrong. Like I said when we discussed it before it is a prevent style playcall. Used almost exclusively in a 3 man front pass defense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 You can keep saying it is bs all you like but you are wrong. Like I said when we discussed it before it is a prevent style playcall. Used almost exclusively in a 3 man front pass defense. You couldn't even answer the simplest of questions. Are you talking about a concept or a play-call? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WG53 Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 You couldn't even answer the simplest of questions. Are you talking about a concept or a play-call? Maybe you should read what you quote. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 Maybe you should read what you quote. I did. You are talking about variants. You were the one that made an entire argument about cover 3 man existing and never actually clarified what you meant. I don't think they are the same as your previous examples and believe that you are bullshitting. My personal opinion is that cover 3 man doesn't exist as an actual play. Do you dispute this or agree? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nash Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 welcome to the board, Bigg.. thanx for the work.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonboy Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 Every time I read one of your posts, I always picture you like this. TitansAB, and CMJ 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WG53 Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 And he is also brilliant when it comes to tax laws for waiters. I see you are still an idiot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WG53 Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 Still name calling. I was hoping you had evolved. For old times sake, how about giving us a Reader's Digest version of your whole waiter's tip/wages/taxes lament. I know it might foil your attempt to impress the newbies with your awesome brain power, but we all need a laugh now and then. Keep up the idiocy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
freakingeek Posted August 16, 2013 Report Share Posted August 16, 2013 To me the definition of homerism is BLIND exuberance. There are several concrete reasons to be optimistic about this years team. There are also several unanswered questions surrounding the team as well. Reasons to be optimistic Totally revamped offensive line rebuilt with guys like Levitre and Warmack who can and will contribute immediately Added offensive weapons Delaney Walker, Justin Hunter, Shonn Greene and a revitalized Chris Johnson A healthy Jake Locker Veteran defensive additions of Pollard, Hill, and most importantly Greg Williams Better roster depth across the board Good young talent on defense... healthy and energized Derrick Morgan, Akeem Ayers, Zach Brown Reasons to be skeptical An unproven offensive coordinator and system in Dowell Loggains An unproven QB in Locker Not enough effort to improve pass rush and a pass rush "by committee" Remaining questions about the secondary and a yet-to-be-named starting CB Obviously there are more questions about the defense but there are still remaining questions on both sides of the ball and a head coach who has yet to be validated. I know that this time of year everyone is optimistic, but considering how I felt about the direction of the team after the end of last season and how I feel about the team this year, the difference is huge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
freakingeek Posted August 16, 2013 Report Share Posted August 16, 2013 BTW, welcome to the board Bigg and thanks for the analysis Bigg Talks Sports 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMJ Posted August 16, 2013 Report Share Posted August 16, 2013 Very goood WG. Now if you can use idiotic in a sentence, your entire vocabulary will have been revealed. Bump. WG ball in your court Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigg Talks Sports Posted August 18, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2013 Preciate it! BTW, welcome to the board Bigg and thanks for the analysis Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.