Jump to content

GOT - HOTD - Season 2


abenjami

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply
36 minutes ago, No1TitansFan said:

More of the GOT lite theme. They'll tease us a few more episodes before any dragon vs dragon war starts which is basically the premise of the whole series. 

Well they established that the Greens were looking to avoid a war right up until Aegon’s son was murdered. Now it’s war for sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Starkiller said:

Well they established that the Greens were looking to avoid a war right up until Aegon’s son was murdered. Now it’s war for sure.

 

It is really considered "looking to avoid a war" when you steal someone's crown?  LOL

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, abenjami said:

 

It is really considered "looking to avoid a war" when you steal someone's crown?  LOL

Both sides were looking to avoid all out war up until the death of Lucerys. They were trying to get support from all of the great houses because if one claimant got a wide majority then it could have prevented war.
 

After Lucerys was killed, war was inevitable even if the Greens didn’t all know it yet. Maybe killing Aemond in retribution wouldn’t have sparked an all out war (though I’d think it would) but killing Greens’ heir to the throne certainly would.

 

Also, “stealing” the crown is debatable because there are 2 totally viable claims.

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Starkiller said:

Also, “stealing” the crown is debatable because there are 2 totally viable claims.

 

I'm certainly no expert on fictional succession claims but it seemed to me that Viserys wanted Rhaenyra.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Greens didn't have a viable claim. The king was clear, it was acknowledged and sworn to.

 

It was so firm, in fact, that the show had to fabricate death bed bullshit to make it less obnoxious when the queen moved for crowning Aegon. But that's only an explanation by misunderstanding on her part. It's still not legitimate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jamalisms said:

The Greens didn't have a viable claim. The king was clear, it was acknowledged and sworn to.

 

It was so firm, in fact, that the show had to fabricate death bed bullshit to make it less obnoxious when the queen moved for crowning Aegon. But that's only an explanation by misunderstanding on her part. It's still not legitimate.

None of that matters once he’s dead. At that point much of the realm goes back to the 1st born son being the heir as was the standard. Women were not deemed to be rulers anywhere else in the realm and the Great Council shown in the opening of the 1st episode establishes that. 
 

Only Alicent seemed to care that the king apparently had a deathbed change of mind that he wanted Aegon to be his heir. The rest of the Greens had already intended to crown Aegon regardless of his stated wishes. That change literally only affects her motivations. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Legal succession, as decreed by the king and sworn to by all, is clear. 

 

What people are willing to do and what rationalizing they provide to break with their vows and to work against regal edict is another matter. Victors will write the history ... but, as a third party, we the viewers can only label Aegon an usurper.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Starkiller said:

Yes, that’s the way a modern Western audience is going to see it.
 

In-world, it’s different. Men are universally given priority in any inheritance claim throughout the realm. 

 

Well then that would make the realm the usurper, or at least an accomplice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...