Who will have the more productive year - Mariota or Flacco?

[Titans279]

I miss your “I am Groot” phase @9 Nines

[pat]

Flaaco.  He's a gamer.

[Denali]

It's easy to get caught up in comparisons that some will argue are invalid because of one reason or another.

 

But what if they were both injured and sitting on the bench?  Then that would even out all of the claims of them not being comparable, since both wouldn't be able to play at all.

 

So in that case, who would you rather have?

Edited May 19, 2019 by Denali

[ManningEnvy]

12 minutes ago, Denali said:

It's easy to get caught up in comparisons that some will argue are invalid because of one reason or another.

 

But what if they were both injured and sitting on the bench?  Then that would even out all of the claims of them not being comparable, since both wouldn't be able to play at all.

 

So in that case, who would you rather have?

Somebody is sitting on a church pew right now thinking why don't they teach that retard some manners.

[kyle021]

Flacco was having a solid year until he got hurt when he had Crabtree, Brown and Snead plus his tight ends. 

 

He got hurt and Jackson came in and ran 20+ times a game and they kept winning and wanted him to play anyway. 

 

Flacco lost his job to a superior athlete and inferior QB based on potential and investment. 

 

Flacco is a solid QB. Give him a good OL and run game and dependable WRs and he will produce way better than you imagine. 

 

I said when MM got hurt that we should sign Flacco. 

 

If Flacco played behind this OL with the way Henry ran last half of the schedule and had targets like Davis, Walker, Humphries, Brown, Taylor and Sharpe as well as a scat back like Lewis. He would put up big numbers and wins

[SleepingTitan]

Not sure about Mariota, but if you change the thread to Tanniota vs Flacco, I'd vote Terry Bridgwater. 

[Titans279]

If Mariota plays around the level of Flacco we should be drafting a QB to replace him.