TitanDuckFan Posted April 11, 2019 Report Share Posted April 11, 2019 9 minutes ago, ChesterCopperpot1 said: “He is a piece of shut but [liberal] media have him a forum 147 times to spew his toxic bullshit.” hmmm...this sounds awfully familiar to the 2016 GOP race and the 2016 election. No, this was the scheme to dismantle that. By people more than willing to cozy up to a "humongous piece of shit" if it would help remove the guy that stole their dreams of spending another 8 years in the White House. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 11, 2019 Report Share Posted April 11, 2019 Having to deal with people like Avenatti is the bargin folks made when they voted for someone as slimy and dishonest as Donald Trump. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChesterCopperpot1 Posted April 11, 2019 Author Report Share Posted April 11, 2019 6 minutes ago, Rolltide said: Trump was legit candidate who was winning primaries. He had a distinct message also. Trump is a piece of shit who drew ratings so liberal news media gave him endless camera time to spew his toxic bullshit. Same with Avennati. Trump and Avennati pulled ratings. If you can’t see the parallels between the two I can’t help you see what’s staring you in the face. Then again you believe Candace Owens isn’t a grifter and means what she says. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little Earl Posted April 11, 2019 Report Share Posted April 11, 2019 16 minutes ago, Bink said: Having to deal with people like Avenatti is the bargin folks made when they voted for someone as slimy and dishonest as Donald Trump. That really is a libtard statement. As if Clinton, whom you voted for, isn't incredibly slimy and dishonest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanDuckFan Posted April 11, 2019 Report Share Posted April 11, 2019 26 minutes ago, ChesterCopperpot1 said: Trump is a piece of shit who drew ratings so liberal news media gave him endless camera time to spew his toxic bullshit. Same with Avennati. Trump and Avennati pulled ratings. If you can’t see the parallels between the two I can’t help you see what’s staring you in the face. Then again you believe Candace Owens isn’t a grifter and means what she says. Sorry to burst you bubble Chester, but the liberal news media gave Trump everything he wanted for one reason. They thought he'd be the easiest person on the Republican side to beat. Remember, hillary was preordained. It was a foregone conclusion she would win. Everybody said so. Especially in the media, and especially here at TR. You were no doubt in on that as well. Avenatti on the other hand, was given time at the lectern for the purpose of discrediting the guy who kept their queen off the throne. They've proven time and time again since 2016 that they'll get in bed with ANYONE willing to do that. One only needs to see the look on all their faces on election night to know this is true. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChesterCopperpot1 Posted April 11, 2019 Author Report Share Posted April 11, 2019 6 minutes ago, TitanDuckFan said: Sorry to burst you bubble Chester, but the liberal news media gave Trump everything he wanted for one reason. They thought he'd be the easiest person on the Republican side to beat. Remember, hillary was preordained. It was a foregone conclusion she would win. Everybody said so. Especially in the media, and especially here at TR. You were no doubt in on that as well. Avenatti on the other hand, was given time at the lectern for the purpose of discrediting the guy who kept their queen off the throne. They've proven time and time again since 2016 that they'll get in bed with ANYONE willing to do that. One only needs to see the look on all their faces on election night to know this is true. Sure they thought Hillary would walk all over Trump, but he was also the highest rated candidate because people from both sides watched. Hate him? Still watch. Love him? Still watch. Trump Drew ratings. Avennati drew ratings. That’s why they were put on TV. CNN, Fox News, And the rest of the media exist but for one reason: to make money. And ratings = money. This is not that difficult to understand. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legaltitan Posted April 11, 2019 Report Share Posted April 11, 2019 Yeah exactly. Trump wasn't on the news in some diabolical scheme to promote the weakest candidate so that Hillary could win. Is the media liberal? Sure they are. Or more are liberal than conservative. Much more. But it blows my mind that we are this many years into the infotainment era and people still think the media is drive by something other than ratings and ad dollars. That is literally all that they care about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanDuckFan Posted April 11, 2019 Report Share Posted April 11, 2019 10 minutes ago, Legaltitan said: Yeah exactly. Trump wasn't on the news in some diabolical scheme to promote the weakest candidate so that Hillary could win. Is the media liberal? Sure they are. Or more are liberal than conservative. Much more. But it blows my mind that we are this many years into the infotainment era and people still think the media is drive by something other than ratings and ad dollars. That is literally all that they care about. "We couldn't help her any more than we have. She's getting just a free ride from the media. We're the biggest one's promoting her campaign." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanDuckFan Posted April 11, 2019 Report Share Posted April 11, 2019 40 minutes ago, Rolltide said: I love the way libtards define things. A president spying on other Americans is perfectly ok with them and they do not think that acid washing away emails after a subpoena could not possibly be obstruction. WTF else is it? It wasn't SPYING! It was "clandestine surveillance without the subject's knowledge." Get it right ya redneck! lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanDuckFan Posted April 11, 2019 Report Share Posted April 11, 2019 8 minutes ago, Rolltide said: They think Barr has no business even mentioning it. How dare he? Who cares about the civil liberties of Americans anyway? Especially the civil liberties of "dirtbag" political opponents. The hoops being jumped through to imply justification of this mess are almost as entertaining as the results have been thus far. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 11, 2019 Report Share Posted April 11, 2019 2 hours ago, Little Earl said: That really is a libtard statement. As if Clinton, whom you voted for, isn't incredibly slimy and dishonest. We get it. You are a trained parrot who can't saying anything but "Clinton" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little Earl Posted April 11, 2019 Report Share Posted April 11, 2019 26 minutes ago, Bink said: We get it. You are a trained parrot who can't saying anything but "Clinton" And we get it. You are a big hypocrite. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChesterCopperpot1 Posted April 12, 2019 Author Report Share Posted April 12, 2019 6 hours ago, Legaltitan said: Yeah exactly. Trump wasn't on the news in some diabolical scheme to promote the weakest candidate so that Hillary could win. Is the media liberal? Sure they are. Or more are liberal than conservative. Much more. But it blows my mind that we are this many years into the infotainment era and people still think the media is drive by something other than ratings and ad dollars. That is literally all that they care about. This. It’s not that fucking difficult. Trump = higher ratings = more ad dollars. CNN can say they hate trump all they want, but their execs fucking love him because he means more $$. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted April 12, 2019 Report Share Posted April 12, 2019 3 minutes ago, ChesterCopperpot1 said: This. It’s not that fucking difficult. Trump = higher ratings = more ad dollars. CNN can say they hate trump all they want, but their execs fucking love him because he means more $$. The head of CBS literally said he was great for ratings. The corporate media only cares about making money. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Btowner Posted April 12, 2019 Report Share Posted April 12, 2019 7 hours ago, Rolltide said: I love the way libtards define things. A president spying on other Americans is perfectly ok with them and they do not think that acid washing away emails after a subpoena could not possibly be obstruction. WTF else is it? I love the way you have taken Obama spying on other American as a fact and parroting it like a mindless drone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.