Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


About TitanDuckFan

  • Rank
    Optimism Reigns

Recent Profile Visitors

4,736 profile views
  1. It could be that Sullivan wants the SCO to try the case. That's what I've wanted all along. Nothing could be better for all concerned than to watch them try to convict Flynn on the facts of this case.
  2. What do you mean there's no evidence? Of course there's evidence. The prosecutor was part of the SCO. He was operating independent of the DOJ, which is why you guys wanted the Mueller investigation in the first place. That prosecutor was VanGrack, with the help of Weissmann and Mueller's other 13 angry democrats. Sullivan ordered VanGrack to produce ALL the Brady material over 2 years ago, and he didn't do that, but swore that he had. Now reams of Brady material show up, most or all of it clearly marked as SCO documents, and immediately afterwards VanGrack quits the case.
  3. This is why the ethicist's view of how to wage war is wrong. Wars on the scale of WWII aren't won on the battlefield. The destruction of industrial capabilities isn't collateral damage. The allies celebrated every time they destroyed a bearing factory for instance. Why? Because without bearings nothing mechanical moves. Not truck nor train nor staff car, ship, sub, tank, artillery piece, motorcycle or airplane etc. Without bearings and tires and fuel they're lawn ornaments. Therefore the job of moving bullets and rifles and rations and fuel and personnel are limited to
  4. Here asshole, let me leave you with this passage from Turley's article about legal abuses, the media's narrative(s) and the blatant echo chamber you all are a part of: You guys exemplify perfectly those with the desire (and fantasies) Turley talks about here. And you've done it with alarming yet predictable regularity since Trump was elected, and before. Ghu help anyone with the brains and the backbone to decry the illegal actions or ineptitude of your Øreo god, lest they incur the wrath of you media echo chamber dwellers.
  5. Because I lived it. For instance, take inflation out of the equation and then check economic growth under obama. Look at the increases in the wealth/wage gap that took place during those years. Look hard at the decrease in the workforce. Then look hard at the scandals. Scandals that Øbama's media friends refuse to publicize, or even investigate. It's pretty simple really, once you get out of the mainstream media bubble.
  6. I don't hate Democrats. I WAS a democrat for a number of years. I hate crooked democrats. Crooked democrats like the ones that made up the Øbama admin for 8 of the worst years in recent history. Crooked democrats that you all spend so much time sucking off. You're some of the worst partisan hacks I've ever seen or interacted with.
  7. It depends on which aspect of the war one examines. The Soviets faced German aggression on their home turf. A lot of it, and are credited with more battles and more kills. But for those who realize America's ability to produce the goods that wars are fought with was a large part of why the war was won, know that the American and British forces, especially the air forces, are almost solely responsible for destroying Hitler's ability to wage war on any front. The Soviets had little to do with damaging/destroying Germany's industrial capabilities. No army fights without food,
  8. Even if Flynn HAD lied to the FBI, that is still NOT perjury. And anyone doing a reasonable job of passing himself off as a "constitutional scholar" would KNOW that.
  9. Try again dumbass. Some of the greatest legal and constitutional minds of our time admit now there was no lie. And there's a link to one of them explaining it all, in my last post. I know y'all struggle with reading things you don't agree with, but the declassified exculpatory documents are out there, and you should all read them before you embarrass yourselves any further.
  10. I guess you two numbnutzs should have read the Turley article. https://jonathanturley.org/2020/05/05/did-the-mueller-team-violate-brady/ Bottom line is, there was no lie. That was the part of the Brady material that the Mueller team failed to supply that Judge Sullivan would have crucified VanGrack for. Furthermore, Flynn's shithouse representation, partners/affiliates of Eric Holder's from Covington & Burling should have insisted on seeing the FD302 that would have exposed all this. But they didn't. Again, Turley with the checkmate.
  11. This case has some similarities with the Bundy cases, both in Oregon and Nevada. Øbama's "Justice" Dept screwed the pooch in both of those cases with overreach and/or prosecutorial misconduct. The judge threw multiple charges out in Nevada, and the jury acquitted the yahooligans in the Oregon case because the prosecutors sought charges and punishments that just weren't warranted. Both cases were lost purely due to the desire to punish people based on ideological and/or political reasons, and the unethical conduct by Holder/Øbama appointed prosecutors and law enforcement. The m
  12. LOL,... You calling someone else a "whiny partisan bitch" is hilarious. It's peak hypocrisy SK. Looked in the mirror lately li'l bitch? Nothing Flynn did, or was even accused of, amounts to perjury. And any real constitutional law professor would know that.
  13. Like I said before you dumbass, it doesn't matter if he lied to the media. If that mattered we'd have to arrest half of Øbama's administration. The word used was perjury. Show us where/when Flynn did that,... Or just STFU.
  14. Perjury? ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!! Ask president dumbfuck when Flynn committed perjury. We'll wait.
  • Create New...