TitanDuckFan Posted November 27, 2018 Report Share Posted November 27, 2018 11 minutes ago, NashvilleNinja said: You obviously didn't watch the game then, Mr Titans fan. Who needs to watch the game? Even the forum leader and moderator quotes stat lines like they're bible verses. and then calls it "EXPERT ANALYSIS." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepingTitan Posted November 27, 2018 Report Share Posted November 27, 2018 Marcus is having to be a QB without a line. The defense is supposed to get a sack without a line. The running backs are supposed to get a TD without a hole. The wide receivers are supposed to get open when they don't have the time--and they honestly can't expect the ball because they don't know if their QB will be in the hospital when they break free. You can blame Rus Webster for this bullshit...once again. When we rebuilt, we didn't get the big uglies that gave us 15 years. We didn't get the explosive playmakers, there were brief exceptions. We didn't get a defense to help our young qbs. The coaching carousel has continued along with the QB carousel...all because the trenches and secondary has not been addressed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crayola Posted November 27, 2018 Report Share Posted November 27, 2018 2 hours ago, SleepingTitan said: Marcus is having to be a QB without a line. The defense is supposed to get a sack without a line. The running backs are supposed to get a TD without a hole. The wide receivers are supposed to get open when they don't have the time--and they honestly can't expect the ball because they don't know if their QB will be in the hospital when they break free. You can blame Rus Webster for this bullshit...once again. When we rebuilt, we didn't get the big uglies that gave us 15 years. We didn't get the explosive playmakers, there were brief exceptions. We didn't get a defense to help our young qbs. The coaching carousel has continued along with the QB carousel...all because the trenches and secondary has not been addressed. Would your team be better off with Goff? C'mon now, Try to focus. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scine09 Posted November 27, 2018 Report Share Posted November 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, Crayola said: Would your team be better off with Goff? C'mon now, Try to focus. No Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crayola Posted November 27, 2018 Report Share Posted November 27, 2018 Just now, scine09 said: No It absolutely would. With Mett as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanDuckFan Posted November 27, 2018 Report Share Posted November 27, 2018 7 minutes ago, Crayola said: It absolutely would. With Mett as well. LOL Goff was trash under Fisher in LA, but McVay turned him around. Mett was trash under Whisenhunt in TN and again in SD, and yet again in PITT under different coaching.. The two are not comparable. There is no scheme that Mett fits. Slow, inaccurate QBs with wind-up releases don't do well in the NFL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scine09 Posted November 27, 2018 Report Share Posted November 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, TitanDuckFan said: LOL Goff was trash under Fisher in LA, but McVay turned him around. Mett was trash under Whisenhunt in TN and again in SD, and yet again in PITT under different coaching.. The two are not comparable. There is no scheme that Mett fits. Slow, inaccurate QBs with wind-up releases don't do well in the NFL. Why are you engaging him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepingTitan Posted November 27, 2018 Report Share Posted November 27, 2018 16 minutes ago, Crayola said: Would your team be better off with Goff? C'mon now, Try to focus. Of course not. If Goff was on this team, he would be out of the league faster than Jake Locker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanDuckFan Posted November 27, 2018 Report Share Posted November 27, 2018 6 minutes ago, scine09 said: Why are you engaging him? Because he needs to be reminded of how stupid he is for betting on Mett. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scine09 Posted November 27, 2018 Report Share Posted November 27, 2018 Just now, TitanDuckFan said: Because he needs to be reminded of how stupid he is for betting on Mett. I think that goes without saying. He had to change his username because he was either banned or embarrassed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crayola Posted November 28, 2018 Report Share Posted November 28, 2018 8 hours ago, TitanDuckFan said: LOL Goff was trash under Fisher in LA, but McVay turned him around. Mett was trash under Whisenhunt in TN and again in SD, and yet again in PITT under different coaching.. The two are not comparable. There is no scheme that Mett fits. Slow, inaccurate QBs with wind-up releases don't do well in the NFL. Oh ok then. Oregon football lovers would know. Gotcha Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justafan Posted November 28, 2018 Report Share Posted November 28, 2018 Just stopping by to laugh at the losers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number9 Posted November 28, 2018 Report Share Posted November 28, 2018 On 11/26/2018 at 10:35 PM, JbgTenn said: 2 pages so far haha I saw this thread a couple of days ago. WTF. I won't waste time even looking. I see four pages and try to figure out what could it possibly have in it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tex in a Can Posted November 28, 2018 Report Share Posted November 28, 2018 There was a much better thread about a month ago, got immediately moved tot he off topic forum. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
japan Posted November 28, 2018 Report Share Posted November 28, 2018 No doubt there are some trash posters on here. But, I think we have identified them and everyone knows who they are and what their agendas are. Like that POS Xander and Simple Jake. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.