Jump to content

Might Bridgewater be traded to the Eagles?


Flarb

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply
4 minutes ago, wiscotitansfan said:

No, just no

Yes. Just yes. It makes sense. Probably won’t happen. But Philly has no third string QB. And Teddy needs a job. And he’s good. Ultimately it depends on Fole’s injury. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

He may as well be traded to the Packers if he cares about playing time and getting to show what he can do. Rodgers wont be logging too many minutes in preseason (clearly mocking you with another dumb scenario)... And this is obviously what you think he's all for, just proving himself?

 

At this point teams just want a guy who can run the offense to grade the other positions on the team, not spend resources and coaching on a guy who will mean nothing to the team.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What sense would that make?  Yeah, trade him to a team with a QB coming off a Super Bowl MVP and the 2nd pick of the draft 3 years ago who will be healthy n short order.  Okay.

 

Foles hurt his shoulder.  He didn't tear his ACL.  Even if for some reason neither guy could go week 1 they're not going to trade for a guy who may be needed for 1 or 2 weeks who doesn't know the offense when they have another QB on the roster that has been there the entire time (Nate Sudfeld) and has gone through mini camp and training camp with the team.  And they already signed Hackenberg as insurance if they need a backup for a short amount of time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, GoodToGo said:

My bad. You are the experts. 

It has nothing to do with that.  Bridgewater is a better QB than Sudfeld.  But thinking logically how would this make any sense whatsoever for the Eagles?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...