CMJ Posted November 28, 2011 Report Share Posted November 28, 2011 He should carve up the Bills and Colts D and if the Titans can hang with the Saints for a few quarters, theirs as well. Honestly, the only teams the Titans should have trouble running on from here on out, are the Jags and Texans. I suspect CJ will finish around 1200 yards and a ypc of 4 when it's all said and done. I could live with this. It would be encouraging going into next season and hopefully the guy will keep himself in shape this time (and we address the interior OL). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOTT Posted November 28, 2011 Report Share Posted November 28, 2011 I only figured out there was something up so soon b/c I saw HOTT's post lol I'm about half smart sometimes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cshumak2 Posted November 28, 2011 Report Share Posted November 28, 2011 Is it bad that i was looking for some mathmatical trend for a good 30s before reading on and realizing what he was talking about? at least you only spent 30 seconds doing it...i was looking at it for 2 or 3 minutes before i looked at the following post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
XAEA12 Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 He should carve up the Bills and Colts D and if the Titans can hang with the Saints for a few quarters, theirs as well. Honestly, the only teams the Titans should have trouble running on from here on out, are the Jags and Texans. I suspect CJ will finish around 1200 yards and a ypc of 4 when it's all said and done. I've go to say if he ended with 1200 yards i'd be damn impressed, considering how absolutely dreadful the first half of the year was. He had 366 yards in the first 8 games, That would mean 834 yards in 8 games and would signal to me that he's back. if he can make it to 1200 then i think he'll be fine next year for sure. but i'd be surprised if he made it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 I took the question literally and thought hard for a minute and the correct answer is 7.8. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nash Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 I took the question literally and thought hard for a minute and the correct answer is 7.8. that's what I got CTF.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 Yeah Nash it figures it would take a man of science like yourself to match me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-RAC Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 Did you guys actually graph it or something? It looked like a simple multiplication sequence to me where X should be the previous number multiplied by 1.57. When I saw it, first thing that came to me was dividing the first two numbers and applying it to the third, which worked. Of course, there is generally no single 'correct' answer in a number sequence as any sequence potentially holds any number of patterns. I'm just curious what came to you guys first. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted November 29, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 The correct answer is 8.2. Multiply the first number by 1.57 and round to one decimal. Rinse and repeat. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted November 29, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 ... which means we'd better not cut him. By training camp next year he's gonna be runnin like a boss. Almost 200 ypc in July Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.