Jump to content

Going for two was absolutely genius


OILERMAN

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, wiscotitansfan said:

As I said. We ran a variation of it before... How do you think we won against NO last year?

 

The TE play is the exact type of play that people are complaining. I agree that it should have been that exact play but the things that people don't like about that 2 pt play vs the one to Fasano have the exact similarities that people are complaining about

there are zero similarities. 

im watching it now. 

we both have football players on the field. thats where the similarities end. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 249
  • Created
  • Last Reply
8 hours ago, abenjami said:

Why would he be running clock with a 17-17 score?

Am not sure if we're really disagreeing.

If the score was tied, would expect Andy Reid to be creative to try to win the game.  He's really good at scheming the short passing game to get YAC.  Easily could see another Ty Hill TD.

If we had the lead, it's the same thing but hopefully the momentum is on our side and we get pressure and a sack.

As it was, Reid had the lead and predictably kept the ball on the ground.  While Titans weren't left with much time, Reid also left the game in the hands of the best player on the field.  And Mariota delivered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

on the 2pt play -- In Mularkey's presser, he said the route to Douglas was open initially and he would have liked to see Marcus make the throw.  Of course, he could be covering, but he'll be questioned about this one for a while.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, begooode said:

on the 2pt play -- In Mularkey's presser, he said the route to Douglas was open initially and he would have liked to see Marcus make the throw.  Of course, he could be covering, but he'll be questioned about this one for a while.

I heard on a podcast that broke down the all 22 Douglas was open had Mariota thrown it

It worked out anyway

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, begooode said:

on the 2pt play -- In Mularkey's presser, he said the route to Douglas was open initially and he would have liked to see Marcus make the throw.  Of course, he could be covering, but he'll be questioned about this one for a while.

i wish i'd heard that earlier. I had the game DL'd but thew it away to save space. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard Kuharsky explain why it was a terrible decision, he honestly didn't know what he was talking about. At one point he said KC could have just chosen to go to OT(assuming the Titans tied the game). With 3:12 left KC had no choice for OT unless they got a 1st down. They would have been under pressure to pass the ball and drive or do what they did which lost them the game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, OILERMAN said:

I heard Kuharsky explain why it was a terrible decision, he honestly didn't know what he was talking about. At one point he said KC could have just chosen to go to OT(assuming the Titans tied the game). With 3:12 left KC had no choice for OT unless they got a 1st down. They would have been under pressure to pass the ball and drive or do what they did which lost them the game.

I heard him say that your argument was silly because if we make the 2pt conversion then KC goes all out to get into FG range. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...