heyitsmeallen Posted October 2, 2013 Report Share Posted October 2, 2013 Ryan matthews for Reggie Wayne. that trade seemed even to me... why did everyone veto it so fast? speak up as to why you dont want the trade to go through. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bink Posted October 2, 2013 Report Share Posted October 2, 2013 Wasn't me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dmeade- Posted October 2, 2013 Report Share Posted October 2, 2013 I didn't vote either. NN may have league manager vetoed it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted October 2, 2013 Report Share Posted October 2, 2013 Was it vetoed away which takes half the league or just one vote? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMJ Posted October 2, 2013 Report Share Posted October 2, 2013 It takes five votes to veto. I had to veto because I can't let nines run away with the division he and I are in. Its not about you Allen, its about not letting an undefeated team get even better. Period. Especially if you have to take on said undefeated team in the playoffs and are on pace to do so. I broke nines nuts and said I would get my bros to veto with me, but it was said in jest and to get on his nerves. Looks like there were four others who don't want him to get even better as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
N/A Posted October 2, 2013 Report Share Posted October 2, 2013 (edited) Makes no sense, but likely helped me. I was fine with the trade, but I was giving up more. I think Amendola will be back soon, so Reggie Wayne would be on my bench. Ryan Mathews has upside but right now he is not even starter quality, whereas pretty much every team in a 12 team league, that starts at least 2 receivers, would start Reggie Wayne. So player for player, HeyItsMeAllen was getting a better deal in my opinion, and for our team's situation, it was about as even a trade as you can make. So excluding CMJ and his 2 minions, whom he admitted he got to veto it, I do not understand the other two votes. Especially considering, in fantasy football and assuming you have integrity, you do not veto trades because it improves a team you might play,;you veto a trade that is lopsided, which that trade was clearly not. Edited October 2, 2013 by 9_nines Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
N/A Posted October 2, 2013 Report Share Posted October 2, 2013 (edited) HeyItsMeAllen, You should offer Ryan Mathews to CMJ for his 2nd round pick next year. He did it before. Edited October 2, 2013 by 9_nines heyitsmeallen 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMJ Posted October 2, 2013 Report Share Posted October 2, 2013 Never even contacted my "minions". It was said in jest. But I still loved reading your tantrum, especially from a man of your age. LOL Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted October 2, 2013 Report Share Posted October 2, 2013 CMJ has gone rogue! CMJ, and Dmeade- 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMJ Posted October 2, 2013 Report Share Posted October 2, 2013 CMJ has gone rogue! Would you stop pouring salt please?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dmeade- Posted October 2, 2013 Report Share Posted October 2, 2013 CMJ! CMJ! CMJ! CMJ 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiscotitansfan Posted October 2, 2013 Report Share Posted October 2, 2013 Bullshit to veto the trade because you don't like it... I fucking hate league wide vetoes because people just bitch all the time about it being unfair only because they don't want to get beat by a team. If you are willing to give up a better receiver for a RB because I assume he needed a RB. Bink 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
heyitsmeallen Posted October 2, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 2, 2013 (edited) Bullshit to veto the trade because you don't like it... I fucking hate league wide vetoes because people just bitch all the time about it being unfair only because they don't want to get beat by a team. If you are willing to give up a better receiver for a RB because I assume he needed a RB. its also why i dislike league wide votes... it was a completely fair trade that benefitted both teams... I need a WR because the ones i have aren't doing that great and hill just got hurt this week) and i dont need both ryan matthews and woodhead. Edited October 2, 2013 by heyitsmeallen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
N/A Posted October 2, 2013 Report Share Posted October 2, 2013 (edited) Can't beat em, join em or in other words, CMJ won't know which is his brother's team: http://www.fleaflicker.com/nfl/league?leagueId=130522 Edited October 2, 2013 by 9_nines Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMJ Posted October 2, 2013 Report Share Posted October 2, 2013 Both are a stones throw away and neither trade. And they are in different divisions. And nothing a board message from me wont resolve. LOL Here is nines, the old bald guy, crying to me: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.