OILERMAN Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 I already said I don't think Munchak makes the call who starts Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 ctm, Answer the question, do you think Locker should have taken over last season at any point? Yes, but there is a clear double standard here. Fisher is excused for not starting Mcnair for two years but MM is ripped for not starting Locker his first year despite no off season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scine09 Posted June 15, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 I already said I don't think Munchak makes the call who starts Then what did you mean when you said that Munchak prefers the vet because he's afraid of the unknown? You're contradicting yourself to fit your agenda as usual. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 I already said I don't think Munchak makes the call who starts Of course he does. That's just bashing him again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 Yes, but there is a clear double standard here. Fisher is excused for not starting Mcnair for two years but MM is ripped for not starting Locker his first year despite no off season. LOL... so you agree that Locker should have started last season but don't want Munchak questioned about it? As for as McNair and Fisher's rookie seasons. Who really cares about 20 years ago? Second of all McNair came from a division 2 school and never lined up under center, he didn't have a real playbook and was no where near ready to run an NFL offense. His rookie preseason was a total embarrassment. So really if you wanna get into that debate, as a matter of fact it was ok for Fisher to sit McNair 2 years ago. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 Of course he does. That's just bashing him again. Webster got interviewed on TV basically explaining how he was deciding on who the starting QB was going to be. I also think it's pretty obvious Munchak wasn't allowed to replace CJ after the first Colt game Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 I'll say it again. Munchak should be judged until he's in year 3. That doesn't mean I can't point out when he challenges a play that is beyond stupid or makes other mistakes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IowaOiler Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 @OILERMAN....if Munch makes it to his fourth year, you will most likely owe me $100. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 @OILERMAN....if Munch makes it to his fourth year, you will most likely owe me $100. Removing all emotion from the situation... The Titans are very likely going to have a losing record in 2012. That's going to represent a step back. Munchak will be heading into his final season as the Titans head coach in a must win situation. Meanwhile Fisher is a lock to have the Rams improve from their 2-14 record. They are loaded with draft picks and an owner willing to spend on free agents. There is no way Fisher under performs any time soon the Rams are so bad. Can anyone dare say the Titans had a better off season than the Rams? This isn't just about Fisher vs. Munchak. Munchak could very likely get fired because of MR and Webster's short comings. In short your bet was stupid and without any real thought. It's pretty amazing a person could make a bet this bad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IowaOiler Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 Removing all emotion from the situation... The Titans are very likely going to have a losing record in 2012. That's going to represent a step back. Munchak will be heading into his final season as the Titans head coach in a must win situation. Meanwhile Fisher is a lock to have the Rams improve from their 2-14 record. They are loaded with draft picks and an owner willing to spend on free agents. There is no way Fisher under performs any time soon the Rams are so bad. Can anyone dare say the Titans had a better off season than the Rams? This isn't just about Fisher vs. Munchak. Munchak could very likely get fired because of MR and Webster's short comings. In short your bet was stupid and without any real thought. It's pretty amazing a person could make a bet this bad. We shall see. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 We already know the bet was stupid. You could win the bet and you still made a bad bet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scine09 Posted June 15, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 Why "in all likelihood" will the Titans most likely have a losing record in 2012? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 Why "in all likelihood" will the Titans most likely have a losing record in 2012? Lack of talent in key areas as well as a schedule vs too many top QBs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IowaOiler Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 We already know the bet was stupid. You could win the bet and you still made a bad bet. Who is 'we?' You and your mom? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 Yea, I got it. Fisher sits McNair for two years and everything is fine. But MM is an idiot because he didn't start Locker his first year despite no off season. This has nothing to do with Fisher or McNair and to bring either up in the conversation is ridiculous. As if this needed to be said again for the umpteenth time, Locker has been ready to start since forever ago. The idea that he needs to be "developed" any further is the stuff of mental midgets, whether those midgets coach the Titans or not. And I say that as a fan of Munch and what he's done with the team in general. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.