WG53 Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 Weren't we 9th in sacks last year? Why yes, yes we were. We've got new blood in our secondary. And you have no idea how our passing game will be. Racking up sacks in a few games against terrible OLs does not mean you have a good pass rush. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 Weren't we 9th in sacks last year? Why yes, yes we were. Â Half their sacks came in 3 games against terrible offenses, the pass rush was a weakness last year and they didn't add any real threats Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WG53 Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 I know. But he does a terrible job of acting intelligent in most threads...seeing as trolling people on the internet is not what I would consider 'intelligent'. ETA: He was also the guy that tried to tell me that a Tampa 2 is the same as cover 3 (not exactly in those terms), because three defenders go deep... Wow keep making shit up. I never said that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 WG53 is a great poster, his only problems are he doesn't take up for himself enough and often lets people attack him without putting up a good fight  His other problem is when someone puts up a good case that he's wrong on an issue he just rolls right over and admits he wrong way too fast  He's also way too civil to the fellow board members, especially Jamal Jonboy, and KogaShuko 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 (edited) Wow keep making shit up. I never said that. Don't act like you didn't say that 3deep man and cover three are the same *in terms of their designation as cover 3. They are only the same because three defenders end up deep, which is the same as a Tampa 2. Edited August 15, 2013 by IsntLifeFunny Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitansGuru Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 True. I'll make the edit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitansAB Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 WG53 is a great poster, his only problems are he doesn't take up for himself enough and often lets people attack him without putting up a good fight His other problem is when someone puts up a good case that he's wrong on an issue he just rolls right over and admits he wrong way too fast He's also way too civil to the fellow board members, especially Jamal I have nothing against WG53. I think he's a quality human being. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WG53 Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 Don't act like you didn't say that 3deep man and cover three are the same *in terms of their designation as cover 3. They are only the same because three defenders end up deep, which is the same as a Tampa 2. Tampa 2 has nothing to do with that argument. And no need to rehash the actual argument. We won't agree because you just argue semantics. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 Half their sacks came in 3 games against terrible offenses, the pass rush was a weakness last year and they didn't add any real threats Most teams accumulate their sacks over a few games. This is the way of the NFL. Very few teams are consistent the whole way through. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 WG53 is a great poster   True. I'll make the edit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 Tampa 2 has nothing to do with that argument. And no need to rehash the actual argument. We won't agree because you just argue semantics. HA! Indeed I do. Okay, I was just fucking with you, but you know I'm right that you said 3 deep man and cover 3 were both cover 3, which would only be true if my earlier post was correct. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 Most teams accumulate their sacks over a few games. This is the way of the NFL. Very few teams are consistent the whole way through. Â Regardless the Titans pass rush was weak and their coverage was even weaker. Â Teams completed 66% of their passes, they gave up the 2nd most TD passes and a 93 passer rating. Those are terrible numbers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WG53 Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 Funny, I'm pretty sure this whole thread shows your lack of adding anything useful or taking a joke. Titansab and I joked around for half of this thread I so get a clue. Aa far as adding to the discussion, there is nothing to see here. I already explained why there are reasons to not be overly optimistic: pass rush, secondary, passing game. I am taking a wait and see approach in our DLs ability against the run but not too optimistic there either. I think we will be more competitive in games than last year but doubt our record reflects it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 Regardless the Titans pass rush was weak and their coverage was even weaker. Â Teams completed 66% of their passes, they gave up the 2nd most TD passes and a 93 passer rating. Those are terrible numbers. I didn't say anything about their coverage. The fact they were 9th in sacks is enough to disregard any sentiment that they were terrible in the pass-rush category. The fact that Morgan and Wimbley (especially Morgan) were very good at getting pressures when they had a terrible secondary furthers my point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitansAB Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 Titansab and I joked around for half of this thread I so get a clue. This is true. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.