Top 5 Worst Regular Season Losses Since the Titans Became the Titans

[Denali]

Another bad game was the 2003 loss at NE when McNair got picked for a TD at the end when they were driving for the win. Personally that was the worst loss in the regular season I've ever had to deal with because I was there and the Patriot fans were heckling me basically the whole time.

It was worse than even the SD playoff loss for me.

I was at that game too.

It was Ty Law and he totally jumped the route for the pick 6. Terrible mistake by McNair. New England is one of those places where the Titans never seem to win.

[OILERMAN]

Does anyone else laugh when Scine posts stuff like "a week 3 loss cost the team Homefield and maybe the superbowl."?

Yes, it's like his claim that a week 1 win over the Lions(The Calvin non TD game) is what got the 11-5 Bears into the playoffs and to the NFC title game

Then he talks about agendas

[scine09]

A game week 1 means just as much as any other game Oilerman.

To dismiss it is being naive.

[OzTitan]

Maybe they should just play the last few games of a season for each team and then start the playoffs?

[OILERMAN]

A game week 1 means just as much as any other game Oilerman.

To dismiss it is being naive.

Actually it was you that tried to say that game meant more than the others. You said if the Bears lose that game they would have probably missed the playoffs. It means as much as the other games, you tried to make it more important than the other games

[OzTitan]

If all wins and loses are equal in effect as far as being W's and L's go, and in one particular win it came down to a precarious event to decide it, it could be said that team's record being what it was is equally precarious as a result, but then pretty much every team has these for both W's and L's throughout 16 games.

[ManningEnvy]

Scine said he would take VY over Eli Manning. Does this not tell you anything?

If that doesn't......

2. Week 14, 2003 vs Indianapolis, in a game the Titans dominated from start to finish, Eddie Berlin fumbled twice, Justin Mccareins once and Shad Meier once giving the Colts the 29-27 victory. It cost the Titans the AFC South title and was pretty much the game that changed the fortunes of both teams in the division for years.

He actually believes that that game changed the fortunes of both teams. The Colts having Manning had nothing to do with it. By the way, the Colts led 29-13 going into the fourth quarter. So much for dominating from start to finish huh?

[scine09]

Actually it was you that tried to say that game meant more than the others. You said if the Bears lose that game they would have probably missed the playoffs. It means as much as the other games, you tried to make it more important than the other games

Well if the Bears lost that game they would have missed the playoffs but that has nothing to do with this thread.

[scine09]

Earth to Scine!.... we got outplayed by the worst team in the NFL with fing Orlovsky at QB and made Brown look like a fing HOF stud at RB. If that wasn't baqd enough the loss torpedoed our playoff chances. While it isn't pleasant to watch I'll accept playing a bad game and getting spanked by a play off caliber team or even an average team but nobody in the NFL saw the Colts even being able to compete in the SEC. They sucked. They should have been our easiest two games on the schedule and we crapped our pants. In a way not having 6 fumbles and 6 ints that game (Hass did have two critical ints) makes it worse.

I think what you're doing is putting too much weight on the game because it was so recent and not taking into account the many terrible losses that the franchise has had since 1999, losses that meant a lot more because they could have potentially cost the team a Super Bowl.

The Indy loss in 2003, the NE loss in 2003, Cle loss in 2002. If they win even one of those games there is definitely a chance that they would have won the Super Bowl. I put the Cleveland loss at the top because that one cost the team home field throughout.

[Guest]

A game week 1 means just as much as any other game Oilerman.

To dismiss it is being naive.

Once again I question if you have ever played sports. Everyone knows that games played later in a season carry more weight except for you. Also, how idiotic is it to think you can change one event 3 months in the past and that everything else will play out the same exact way?

[ManningEnvy]

Once again I question if you have ever played sports. Everyone knows that games played later in a season carry more weight except for you. Also, how idiotic is it to think you can change one event 3 months in the past and that everything else will play out the same exact way?

What are you saying? According to Scine, if the Giants' didn't get that call against the Cards............

[scine09]

Once again I question if you have ever played sports. Everyone knows that games played later in a season carry more weight except for you. Also, how idiotic is it to think you can change one event 3 months in the past and that everything else will play out the same exact way?

uhhhh, no. Every game means exactly the same.

Last time I looked teams get 1 win for a win in September and 1 win for a win in December.

The point is to win the games in September so you have wiggle room in December.

[scine09]

What are you saying? According to Scine, if the Giants' didn't get that call against the Cards............

Which happens to be 100% true by the way.

[Guest]

uhhhh, no. Every game means exactly the same.

Last time I looked teams get 1 win for a win in September and 1 win for a win in December.

The point is to win the games in September so you have wiggle room in December.

Wrong again. Keep trying.

[scine09]

Wrong again. Keep trying.

Actually I'd happen to be right on this one but whatever. We're not gonna agree.