Jump to content

Washington Post reporting that Trump's legal team is now focused on exploring extent and depth of pardon powers


9 Nines

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, ben4titans said:

Confirmation? Lol. Nice try. Does anyone else find it convenient that the Russian narrative heated up again right as they knew Trump and Putin would be at G20? This is probably just coincidence right? I'm sure they didn't hold the DT-jr story did they? This is all too transparent. 

You're scrambling. Don't start spouting theories because you're having trouble dealing with news.

Maybe Hillary and Obama planned all of this ... gasp!!!

Do you find it convenient that Trump did an interview with New York Times where he made himself look bad too? That New York Times always planting stories that hurt Trump's agenda!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply
9 minutes ago, ben4titans said:

Confirmation? Lol. Nice try. Does anyone else find it convenient that the Russian narrative heated up again right as they knew Trump and Putin would be at G20? This is probably just coincidence right? I'm sure they didn't hold the DT-jr story did they? This is all too transparent. 

When has the Russian narrative not been heated?

I will answer. It has been extremely hot for nearly a year now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, ben4titans said:

Is your twitter feed full of the word "scrambling" tonight?  I talked about the NYT interview last night. Also, it isn't a theory. A reporter, not the one who broke the story, had been working on the Donnie Jr. meeting for quite a while, so obviously it wasn't breaking news. They had that info. The Russian narrative hit a lull for a few weeks...now it is back with a vengeance...coincidentally right around the time Trump/Putin met. Look, that is how the game is played and they are getting maximum play out of it, but lets not deny reality. Also, the reality is, people don't care about Russia. So the Left really better hope there is a pot of gold at the end of this rainbow. This is probably one of the more high stakes game of political poker that has been played in a long time.

 

1. I can guarantee you that RIGHT NOW NYT is sitting on several unconfirmed stories. But you need to fact check, need to check sources and you need to make sure you get it right.

2. There is pressure on journalists to release the story first ... you realize that right? Reporters don't sit on stories waiting for the shoe to drop, they tend break them as they get them.

3. Maybe Donald Jr. should release the info first next time? LOL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ben4titans said:

The article doesn't say they have come to any point...the article uses an unnamed adviser who says it is being discussed. You say everyone already knew they were discussing it. So what is the point of the article? 

I didn't say everyone knew they were already discussing it. I said everyone knew it was an option and might get to that point. The fact that they have, is news.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ben4titans said:

1) Yeah, there has been a lot of fact checking going on lately.

2) No shit, those who leaked the info had it for a while. They knew as soon as it was leaked it would go, making your first point mute.

3) Release info on a meeting in which both parties thus far have admitted to it being nothing more than a ruse and a waste of time? 

OK ... so people in the White House decided to come forward. Leakers can control a narrative but you blamed the NYT. 

Yes, Trump Jr. should've released the info. Or Kushner should've disclosed it on the security clearance form. He did not.

All of this seems like frustration on your part regarding bad news for Trump. 

"WAAAAAH why can't they release all the bad news at once! Those dirty media types release the bad periodically!"

That's the weakest argument I've ever heard and another sad attempt to condone this obvious cloud forming over trump.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ben4titans said:

LOL, you are all spun up. You keep wanting to infer they have decided or gotten to that point. That isn't what the article says, it says they are discussing his options. You honestly think the President is just now discussing this option in the last 24 hours? Come on, use some critical thinking.

Ugh.. What point exactly are you attempting to make here bc you're just arguing for the sake of it at this point. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, reo said:

Ugh.. What point exactly are you attempting to make here bc you're just arguing for the sake of it at this point. 

He's arguing semantics because the meat and potatoes isn't to his liking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, big2033 said:

He's arguing semantics because the meat and potatoes isn't to his liking.

I agree which is why I just got tired of it. It's pointless. 

He's coming across pretty frantic actually. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ben4titans said:

No one cares what the Dems think. They are irrelevant. They are being sued by people within their own Party. The are wholly and completely corrupt. 

K

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...