reo Posted 17 hours ago Report Share Posted 17 hours ago https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/04/260411081426.htm Being told this is potentially huge. Any chemical engineers out there that could break this down for me better than chatgpt? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted 7 hours ago Report Share Posted 7 hours ago A "67" year old theory? Was this article written by an extremely verbose 15 year old? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CreepingDeath Posted 26 minutes ago Report Share Posted 26 minutes ago 7 hours ago, NashvilleNinja said: A "67" year old theory? Was this article written by an extremely verbose 15 year old? A 15-year old who hasn't learned about proper use of a/an? "A “impossible” molecule has finally been tamed in water—proving a 67-year-old theory and hinting at a cleaner future for chemistry." 16 hours ago, reo said: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/04/260411081426.htm Being told this is potentially huge. Any chemical engineers out there that could break this down for me better than chatgpt? I'm not a chem engineer, but w/o providing what an AI bot told you, how would any of us know if we could do it better? From the article, it looks like it is 1) safer (not having to use toxic shit); and 2) same as biological. I assume the biological part opens many doors for genetic engineering shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.