Dmeade- Posted February 16, 2012 Report Share Posted February 16, 2012 Why? That guy hasn't had anything in years. When he and TO played for the Bengals in 2010 Owens was the better WR. Owens just missed 1000 yards, had more receptions, better yards per catch and more than double the TDs with 9. If someone wanted a stop gap one year WR Owens would be the guy I'd take over Ocho or Moss. Ocho has still got gas left in the tank and he works his ass off. Owens is an absolute lunatic. You would have to be a complete fool to bring that cancer into your locker room. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted February 16, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2012 By all accounts, Owens has been great in his last two stops. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLocker10 Posted February 16, 2012 Report Share Posted February 16, 2012 By all accounts, Owens has been great in his last two stops. He has been better I really think he would fall in line He has to, the guy has serious money troubles Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justafan Posted February 17, 2012 Report Share Posted February 17, 2012 No thanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frone Posted February 24, 2012 Report Share Posted February 24, 2012 From NFL.com (about a week ago): Titans officials say Moss didn't hurt team in 2010 stint Fisher says it's 'too early' to say if Moss is fit with Rams Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frone Posted February 24, 2012 Report Share Posted February 24, 2012 All the talk about Moss being "done" or that Fisher/Titans thought so...and no one has a comment? Interesting. Also, if the report is to be believed, then it looks like the lack of substantial utilization of him was because of 'Dinger's plan to use him only as a decoy (and because he couldn't be on the field with Britt ). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.