Jump to content

Head Coach Candidates 2026 Edition


AvgJoe

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, scine09 said:

Tomlin won a Super Bowl.  Could've easily won two.

The first one was with a prebuilt contender. Like john gruden when he got the bucs already loaded. 

Edited by Callidus
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Albert Breer has a few nuggets here about the HC search and some of the analytical studies the team is already undertaking about varying success rates of second time HC and coordinators with more than

It is becoming really annoying how some people are using bad result as an excuse to paint the last HC hiring process as a sham. Facts are Callahan was an in demand candidate during that hiring cycle e

Callahan was a great "candidate" and a terrible head coach. 

Posted Images

2 hours ago, tgo said:

 

You could definitely see the tendencies differentiate between those two. 

 

But the system that Kelly/Downing both ran is rooted in the Erhardt/Perkins verbiage and philosophy (which is what McDaniels uses also). Kelly ran the same system under BOB and it looked quite similar stylistically between both O'Brien and Vrabel - which is why that hiring was a fit. 

 

The Titans variation under Vrabel was an interesting mix though - they kept the LaFleur zone run game (Shanahan OZ) but used the Erhardt/Perkins system and passing philosophy overall. That's partially why the run game and pass game often seemed disjointed. 

 

Anyway, Erhardt/Perkins philosophy (BOB, Daboll, Tim Kelly, McDaniels, Mularkey to an extent) is very different than the West Coast systems of the Gruden/Reid/Callahan varieties (power/man blocking centrally, some inside zone). Also of course much different than the Shanahan tree which is much more reliant on pre-snap motions and recognition, and outside zone running to control the horizontal flow of the defense. Lot more 2 TE sets, roll-outs, play-action, etc. 

I'll take your word for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike Tomlin and Steelers appear to be headed towards mutual split especially if Steelers miss playoffs.

 

Im a big Tomlin fan but I do worry about his tendency to micromanage slightly. Will he demand more control than Brinker/Borgonzi possibly want (and his pedigree absolutely demands that he should). Is he on board with a 2 year process to contention (a realistic expectation). Does he get with prioritizing development over immediate answers that veterans could provide.

 

Im not sure, but Tomlin would invigorate the fanbase in a big way. He instantly becomes a superstar in Nashville and gets plastered on everything  

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, titansfan said:

Mike Tomlin and Steelers appear to be headed towards mutual split especially if Steelers miss playoffs.

 

Im a big Tomlin fan but I do worry about his tendency to micromanage slightly. Will he demand more control than Brinker/Borgonzi possibly want (and his pedigree absolutely demands that he should). Is he on board with a 2 year process to contention (a realistic expectation). Does he get with prioritizing development over immediate answers that veterans could provide.

 

Im not sure, but Tomlin would invigorate the fanbase in a big way. He instantly becomes a superstar in Nashville and gets plastered on everything  

Yeah, to land Tomlin, Brinker would absolutely have to cede some power. I would be on board with 86ing Brinker all together if it meant landing Tomlin. I feel like Borgonzi would be good with a coach like Tomlin having alot of power in an organization. Hell.......he came from kc where Andy Reid is likely the most powerful coach in the NFL. He has seen it work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, oldschool said:

Lol brinker is team president basically. Hes not ceding power to a dude two levels below him. Some of you need to get a grip.

I did not say he would, I said he would probably have to in order to land Tomlin. Then I stated I would be in favor of canning his ass if it meant getting Tomlin. I have not been impressed. According to his own admission, he was directly involved in the Sneed trade, and he was directly involved in the offseason that got Ran canned. So it seems to me the only thing he is good at is sucking up and chucking people under the bus. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BeedoeLaw said:

I did not say he would, I said he would probably have to in order to land Tomlin. Then I stated I would be in favor of canning his ass if it meant getting Tomlin. I have not been impressed. According to his own admission, he was directly involved in the Sneed trade, and he was directly involved in the offseason that got Ran canned. So it seems to me the only thing he is good at is sucking up and chucking people under the bus. 

 

Brinker is the head of football ops and hired borgonzi... they are going to hire a HC that works within that framework period. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

Brinker is the head of football ops and hired borgonzi... they are going to hire a HC that works within that framework period. 

I agree, my comment was about what it would take for the Titans to land Tomlin. However unlikely that is to happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BeedoeLaw said:

I agree, my comment was about what it would take for the Titans to land Tomlin. However unlikely that is to happen.

 

Tomlin doesn't have that level of control with the steelers. He works with the personnel guys to get the players he wants, like all coaches do. He's not brining in his own guys or asserting control like Vrabel did in New England.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, oldschool said:

 

Tomlin doesn't have that level of control with the steelers. He works with the personnel guys to get the players he wants, like all coaches do. He's not brining in his own guys or asserting control like Vrabel did in New England.

Who has final say on the 53 with the Titans?

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BeedoeLaw said:

Who has final say on the 53 with the Titans?

 

Not this again.... Borgonzi does but as with any job, his boss can overrule him. Only in the NFL do fans have this silly notion non owners have final say on anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

Not this again.... Borgonzi does but as with any job, his boss can overrule him. Only in the NFL do fans have this silly notion non owners have final say on anything.

How many other franchises have a Brinker involved with the roster? Did John Robinson have a Brinker? How about Floyd Reese? What about Andy Reid? Hell........does the GM in Pittsburgh have a Brinker that is in between himself and the owner that can overrule him on roster decisions? 

Edited by BeedoeLaw
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member


×
×
  • Create New...