ctm Posted January 15 Report Share Posted January 15 3 hours ago, IsntLifeFunny said: The last part is somewhat immaterial. You bring in a veteran QB who can legitimately start day 1 and force Ward to compete for the job. I doubt they go with Rogers, but I think there are worse ways to go about completely overhauling the worst QB room in the NFL. Ward will start the day they think he is ready. There won't be a legit competition. They may not think he's ready opening day. To be determined after they get him in the building and practice. They need a legit backup regardless. Pragidealist 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post 9 Nines Posted January 15 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 15 (edited) What stands out to me watching Cam Ward is his reactions to pressure. The instant a defender breaks a block and moves toward Ward, Ward's body instantly reacts almost as if he is linked to the stimuli much like a cat does avoiding something - instant, but his head remains the same looking down the field much like a cat acts unphased by whatever made it jump and just continues doing what it was doing. That is the mark of a very good QB, and one that utterly frustrates opponents. This is 3rd and long consistently becoming 1st downs. Edited January 15 by 9 Nines Hyperion, BeedoeLaw, Number9, and 7 others 10 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted January 15 Report Share Posted January 15 (edited) 7 hours ago, NashvilleNinja said: Assuming we do take Ward, is this guy nuts or onto something? Mahomes sat for a year behind Alex Smith so it's not a foreign concept, but...? https://x.com/howie_thetitan/status/1879200888708833337?t=A6o4lHPIDVU2EMN1xvR63g&s=19 No, you start Ward game 1 if you think he’s worth the #1 pick. And I wouldn’t touch Rodgers at this point anyway. Edited January 15 by Starkiller AvgJoe 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragidealist Posted January 15 Report Share Posted January 15 8 minutes ago, Starkiller said: No, you start Ward game 1 if you think he’s worth the #1 pick. And I wouldn’t touch Rodgers at this point anyway. I would do what CTM is saying- start him when he is ready. Its a huge investment and doesn't need to b rushed. Several very good qbs did well to sit a little. They should do what's best for him and determine that AFTER getting to know him... whatever is best for his success. Number9, IsntLifeFunny, and ctm 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
headhunter Posted January 15 Report Share Posted January 15 19 minutes ago, Starkiller said: No, you start Ward game 1 if you think he’s worth the #1 pick. And I wouldn’t touch Rodgers at this point anyway. There's no rush. Im ok if he needs time. We've messed up throwing these QBs to the wolves Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted January 15 Report Share Posted January 15 9 minutes ago, Pragidealist said: I would do what CTM is saying- start him when he is ready. Its a huge investment and doesn't need to b rushed. Several very good qbs did well to sit a little. They should do what's best for him and determine that AFTER getting to know him... whatever is best for his success. There’s no reason to put him on the bench. We aren’t talking about a developmental QB. This isn’t a playoff team with an already established starting QB. Throw him into the fire right away. He will take his lumps but it will benefit him in the long run to get the game experience. freakingeek, and JbgTenn 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
9 Nines Posted January 15 Report Share Posted January 15 The NFL must embrace modern advancements in neuroscience to improve player development and performance. Emerging research indicates that certain psychedelic substances can enhance brain plasticity, enabling the mind to absorb and process information similarly to how young children learn—rapidly and effectively from their surroundings. This groundbreaking concept is backed by studies and thought-provoking insights, such as those discussed in an NPR feature titled, "A Scientist Took a Psychedelic Drug — and Watched His Own Brain 'Fall Apart.'" Here is a formal proposal to the NFL: When developing a rookie quarterback, consider creating controlled environments where the quarterback and their offensive line can engage in supervised sessions involving substances that promote neural plasticity. This could foster a heightened state of learning and synchronization among players. Potential benefits: Accelerated learning and adaptation for all involved. Enhanced team cohesion and communication. A transformative edge in player development, likely leading to standout performances and potentially securing top draft picks. A unique and captivating experience for fans, adding a new dimension of entertainment to the sport. Risks: Minimal, provided strict safety protocols, ethical guidelines, and professional oversight are in place. Such an innovative approach could redefine player training and elevate the league to the forefront of progressive sports science. Pragidealist 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragidealist Posted January 15 Report Share Posted January 15 44 minutes ago, Starkiller said: There’s no reason to put him on the bench. We aren’t talking about a developmental QB. This isn’t a playoff team with an already established starting QB. Throw him into the fire right away. He will take his lumps but it will benefit him in the long run to get the game experience. I would not take a "one size fits all" approach. Assess where he is. Assess what he needs and go from there. The last thing you want to do is rush him in and make him gun shy of contact or start to see ghosts when he didnt' before. Maybe he's ready to start day 1. Maybe he's got that mentality and skills... but not starting is also an option. It's worked well for some great qbs. I would go into the season being open and do whats best for him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titans279 Posted January 15 Report Share Posted January 15 6 hours ago, OzTitan said: Rodgers will also demand Hackett is involved. Yeeeeaah no. 7 hours ago, IrishTitansFan said: Your brain is totally mashed. It has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with Rodgers demanding personnel and schematic control as a declining player coming in to a young set up Rodgers is one of my favourite players ever I could be convinced they should sign a Danny Dimes type who competes and maybe starts the season. I think teams are realizing that throwing guys to the wolves isn’t necessarily the best idea. Maye and Penix sat for a bit. You guys make strong points that Rodgers probably isn’t that guy though since he will demand a bigger degree of personalization of the offense. We don’t want to invest heavily in one year of Rodgers. He would be upset if we spend the #1 pick on someone who will likely supplant him this season rather than someone to help him. Cousins was upset but he’s a professional. Rodgers is a diva. It would not be a good dynamic. Number9, and IsntLifeFunny 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BudsOilers Posted January 15 Report Share Posted January 15 You figure Brinker knows the ARod experience and would know the pros/cons. Same deal if they end up with JES as the GM. IrishTitansFan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanskick8851 Posted January 15 Report Share Posted January 15 5 minutes ago, BudsOilers said: You figure Brinker knows the ARod experience and would know the pros/cons. Same deal if they end up with JES as the GM. Yep! Same goes with Davante Adams. Worth noting both were in the FO when GB was ready to move on from Rodgers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
freakingeek Posted January 15 Report Share Posted January 15 I don't know if this has been posted but Ewers declared for the upcoming draft today. I don't think it will change our draft philosophy unless the staff rates Ewers high enough to entertain a trade down. I'm all in for Ward at this point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragidealist Posted January 15 Report Share Posted January 15 32 minutes ago, freakingeek said: I don't know if this has been posted but Ewers declared for the upcoming draft today. I don't think it will change our draft philosophy unless the staff rates Ewers high enough to entertain a trade down. I'm all in for Ward at this point. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCntz7WPK_0 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragidealist Posted January 15 Report Share Posted January 15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmmHaCwaYX4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryBoats Posted January 15 Report Share Posted January 15 It'll be interesting to see what Rodgers signs for. If he goes for the vet minimum like Wilson did, I'd definitely be up for that. Even if the team sucks, he would periodically bring more excitement than the team has had in years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.