Jump to content

Titans learned a lesson yesterday. Henry is vital to the Titans offense.


Number9

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 195
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Henry was the only offensive player on that field that looked like a threat at any point in that game and yet he's not "vital". Man, for as good as TR is on a lot of things, we're way off on Henry and

And they were proven wrong as they lost trying to put the ball in the hands of the qb who was seeing ghosts in the first quarter 😂 stupid gameplan proved to be stupid, and stupid coaches didn’t adjust

You can think eating a bowl of grease each day is fine for your health too... just because they acted like they don't think he's vital doesn't mean he is not vital.   Henry was getting trade

Posted Images

I liked the spread out looks to lighten the box for the run game...regardless of who is in the game. I personally would have liked to see Spears get a few more actual carries in the game. I dont hate Tannehill, not even close, but asking him to drop back 34 times isn't the best game plan for this team imo. I think they will find the balance needed with time, so long as Vrabel doesn't get too involved offensively. I would be absolutely shocked if Henry isn't involved more this week...per Vrabels direction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, japan said:

I don't think a guy starts for 11 years who is 'terrible...'  Sorry.

A QB who has been to the playoffs 3 times in 11 years and has shit postseason stats is not the answer.  To keep hoping and wishing that he will suddenly become the man is asinine.  
 

Teams don’t trade good QB’s for a burger and fries and then pick up a portion of his salary to get rid of him.  Once again, how many GM’s and HC’s have lost their jobs banking on Tannehill?

Edited by Righteous
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mythos27 said:

I didn't say stop throwing. You're exaggerating. I said run more. We could've easily run more and still have been balanced. You have to adjust to the way the game is going. We were stubborn.


If they ran more there would have been opportunities to pass more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, japan said:

I don't think a guy starts for 11 years who is 'terrible...'  Sorry.

 

Semantics. Whole career? No. Most of his career? yes.

No one wanted him after Miami except us - most thought terrible.

Then he was great  for a season and a half.. most still didnt believe he was good.

The last two years he's putting up legit Mariota stats - you think Mariota is terrible

Right now no one would trade for him - back to terrible,

 

2 hours ago, japan said:

🤷‍♂️ I guess, but I posted the runs by Henry in the second half.  They were basically running into a brick wall...

 

Yall keep posting the stats but its being done with what feels disingenuously... without context of downs while also stating the run game was predictable.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL - the only time Tannehill didn't start in his career was when the now fired GM would not allow an open QB competition with Mariota.....

 

Also funny trying to say Tannehill 2021/2022 was anywhere close to what Mariota was doing poorly.  The ONLY time Tannehill has played like Mariota was this past Sunday.

 

As for the running stats - they are what they are.  2nd quarter onward it was shut down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Saints knew they could man up TN weapons because Tanny was playing horrible so they played the box tighter.  Tanny never showed an ability to even hit wide open guys so NO D played it wisely.  

 

If Henry got 30 touches TN wins this game by two TDs. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BudsOilers said:

LOL - the only time Tannehill didn't start in his career was when the now fired GM would not allow an open QB competition with Mariota.....

 

Also funny trying to say Tannehill 2021/2022 was anywhere close to what Mariota was doing poorly.  The ONLY time Tannehill has played like Mariota was this past Sunday.

 

As for the running stats - they are what they are.  2nd quarter onward it was shut down.

For someone who claims to understand football, you sound pretty ignorant after @Mythos27clearly explained the running problem based on personnel. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Bongo59 said:

The Saints knew they could man up TN weapons because Tanny was playing horrible so they played the box tighter.  Tanny never showed an ability to even hit wide open guys so NO D played it wisely.  

 

If Henry got 30 touches TN wins this game by two TDs. 

Uhh no.  They were stacking the box.  He couldn't do anything with the carries he got in the 2nd half.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...