reo Posted Tuesday at 05:52 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 05:52 PM 1 minute ago, rns90 said: Anyone remember reo arguing that Taylor Mays bullshit from years ago? Obviously you don't but I see why you'd want to change the subject. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted Tuesday at 05:55 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 05:55 PM I’m not the one getting destroyed here on understanding simple offensive concepts here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted Tuesday at 05:57 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 05:57 PM Just now, rns90 said: I’m not the one getting destroyed here on understanding simple offensive concepts here. lol sure. where am i wrong? are you a flat earther too b/c this argument is very similar to talking to them. Sometimes it's very annoying talking to a group of stupid people. Bongo59 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IowaOiler Posted Tuesday at 06:01 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 06:01 PM 2 minutes ago, reo said: lol sure. where am i wrong? are you a flat earther too b/c this argument is very similar to talking to them. Sometimes it's very annoying talking to a group of stupid people. Ah, so you talk with flat-earthers a lot. Throw that in with the crossfit stupidity and the picture of you isn't a good one. JT2000 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted Tuesday at 06:03 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 06:03 PM (edited) 3 minutes ago, IowaOiler said: Ah, so you talk with flat-earthers a lot. yeah, I'm a lead aerospace test engineer who does aerodynamic and rocket propulsion testing that use to work for NASA. They tend to seek me out. You guys are very similar to them. Edited Tuesday at 06:04 PM by reo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool Posted Tuesday at 06:10 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 06:10 PM Reo vs multiple smart posters. I know who I'm taking every time. IowaOiler 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted Tuesday at 06:12 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 06:12 PM Just now, oldschool said: Reo vs multiple smart posters. I know who I'm taking every time. all idiots think they're smart. I'm just above average. CreepingDeath 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT2000 Posted Tuesday at 06:20 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 06:20 PM 17 minutes ago, IowaOiler said: Ah, so you talk with flat-earthers a lot. Throw that in with the crossfit stupidity and the picture of you isn't a good one. That's a good line - I'm going to use that! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool Posted Tuesday at 06:21 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 06:21 PM 8 minutes ago, reo said: all idiots think they're smart. I'm just above average. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT2000 Posted Tuesday at 06:22 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 06:22 PM Just now, oldschool said: I resisted responding to that. If he didn't see the irony as he said it... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted Tuesday at 06:37 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 06:37 PM (edited) 16 minutes ago, oldschool said: I'm sure you'd think so if you equate above average to very smart. i don't. It's just... above average. Weird how English works. Edited Tuesday at 06:37 PM by reo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted Tuesday at 06:38 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 06:38 PM 18 minutes ago, JT2000 said: That's a good line - I'm going to use that! He's been making that joke for years. feel free. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepingTitan Posted Tuesday at 06:48 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 06:48 PM 4 hours ago, oldschool said: That's not what he said. He said you don't just push a button and decide a hot route seconds before the snap. Hot routes are predetermined based on down and distance, defensive alignment, etc.... They exist and can be changed if they're built in. titanruss 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted Tuesday at 06:52 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 06:52 PM (edited) 11 minutes ago, SleepingTitan said: They exist and can be changed if they're built in. yep. sounds about right. I would guess back in 2019 or whenever it was that Tannehill first started w/ us (and the next year), they didn't have the ability for these adjustments. They'd just max protect and go deep. This was in large part due to the offense being designed for Mariota who couldn't do it and it carried over into Tannehill's first full year starting. Then the next year after that, they started to add in this ability and that's when our OL and protection problems started showing up. The coaches talked about adding in those types of things that year iirc. Or Tannehill did. I can't remember which... probably both honestly. Edited Tuesday at 07:00 PM by reo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BudsOilers Posted Tuesday at 07:01 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 07:01 PM Nobody disputes the pass protection assignments were failed on the play. Your analysis of what happened though is ridiculously wrong. First off, Spears was part of the pass protection, as the look was rushing 5 or potentially 6 guys. Hat on a hat. Secondly, the play if the pass pro held up was to a wide open Hopkins for an easy 1st down on a shallow cross...... Now the pass pro failed as all 3 guys on that side handled it poorly. Spears ignored the interior rush and immediately goes towards the edge rusher in a wide 9 look. The same guy Dillard is blocking in space against. Newman, meanwhile, is supposed to pick up Murray who was in the gap between Dillard and him. He didn't block anyone and in less that 2 seconds he was hitting Tannehill..... IowaOiler, oldschool, and IsntLifeFunny 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.