nine Posted July 19 Report Share Posted July 19 Remember during a campaign rally back in 2020, Trump promised the crowd that he’d be re-elected for four more years….and then be re-elected again in 2024 for a third consecutive term because America would demand it. People wanted to pretend he was joking; he wasn’t . tgo, Btowner, and OILERMAN 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted July 19 Report Share Posted July 19 6 hours ago, Number9 said: I think he wants to name his successor and revamp the distribution of power in America with his seed being given powers ad infinitum. Trump doesn't give a shit about successors. It's all about Trump. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
begooode Posted July 19 Report Share Posted July 19 3 hours ago, reo said: Trump doesn't give a shit about successors. It's all about Trump. The only person close to Trump who he does not have contempt for is Ivanka, imo. reo 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted July 19 Report Share Posted July 19 A target letter sent by special counsel Jack Smith to former President Donald Trump mentions three federal criminal statutes. The letter cites laws covering conspiracy to defraud the United States, witness tampering, and deprivation of rights under color of law. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-criminal-target-letter-in-election-probe-cites-laws-on-conspiracy-witness-tampering/ar-AA1e4P5h After a little research, I understand what deprivation of rights under color of law actually means. But, any attorneys on here want to speculate what specific actions Trump could have taken to violate this statute? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted July 19 Report Share Posted July 19 TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242 Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted July 19 Report Share Posted July 19 (edited) 30 minutes ago, ctm said: A target letter sent by special counsel Jack Smith to former President Donald Trump mentions three federal criminal statutes. The letter cites laws covering conspiracy to defraud the United States, witness tampering, and deprivation of rights under color of law. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-criminal-target-letter-in-election-probe-cites-laws-on-conspiracy-witness-tampering/ar-AA1e4P5h After a little research, I understand what deprivation of rights under color of law actually means. But, any attorneys on here want to speculate what specific actions Trump could have taken to violate this statute? Not a lawyer, but it seems like any illegal act being performed by a government official ostensibly using/abusing their empowered role as a government official might qualify. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_(law) Edited July 19 by Starkiller Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
begooode Posted July 19 Report Share Posted July 19 The blatant illegality of the scheme from Trump, Eastman, and company has already been attested to some degree by the fact that all Trump's lawyers and advisors were compelled to provide testimony -- meaning the threshold was met for the crime fraud exception to overcome attorney-client privilege. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgo Posted July 19 Author Report Share Posted July 19 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted July 20 Report Share Posted July 20 9 hours ago, begooode said: The only person close to Trump who he does not have contempt for is Ivanka, imo. You're right. He's got lust for her. IsntLifeFunny 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted July 20 Report Share Posted July 20 Exactly how I imagine this trial going. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
begooode Posted July 20 Report Share Posted July 20 (edited) I hope the resident Trumpers here have put their money where their mouth is. Each time Donald Trump gets charged with a crime, the contributions pour in, a CNN analysis of newly released campaign reports shows – underscoring how much the criminal cases confronting the former president have benefited the Republican’s campaign bottom line. The analysis of itemized donations – those larger than $200 – to Trump’s campaign shows his day-by-day contributions over the first six months of this year spiked following the news of his indictments.... https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/19/politics/donald-trump-fundraising-legal-troubles/index.html Edited July 20 by begooode Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted July 20 Report Share Posted July 20 IsntLifeFunny 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted July 20 Report Share Posted July 20 6 hours ago, begooode said: I hope the resident Trumpers here have put their money where their mouthEach time Donald Trump gets charged with a crime, the contributions pour in, a CNN analysis of newly released campaign reports shows – underscoring how much the criminal cases confronting the former president have benefited the Republican’s campaign bottom line. What's wrong with these retards IsntLifeFunny, MadMax, tgo, and 1 other 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted July 21 Report Share Posted July 21 The Georgia case: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/fulton-county-prosecutors-prepare-racketeering-charges-in-trump-inquiry/ar-AA1e9Unr?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=23b2d11e594d4874bf1e2b911a34e54b&ei=30 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post ctm Posted July 21 Popular Post Report Share Posted July 21 11 hours ago, OILERMAN said: What's wrong with these retards Decades of self-admitted lies by Fox news and right-wing media Starkiller, MadMax, OILERMAN, and 2 others 3 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.