Come on Titans Posted July 2, 2023 Report Share Posted July 2, 2023 just sharing... OILERMAN 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post pat Posted July 4, 2023 Popular Post Report Share Posted July 4, 2023 It’s confirmed that there is no substance to the wedding designer case.  In the absence of any facts of a person actually forced to work against their principles, it’s a case of legislating via the judiciary.  https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/03/us/politics/same-sex-marriage-document-supreme-court.html Starkiller, IsntLifeFunny, Come on Titans, and 2 others 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nine Posted July 4, 2023 Report Share Posted July 4, 2023 2 hours ago, pat said: It’s confirmed that there is no substance to the wedding designer case.  In the absence of any facts of a person actually forced to work against their principles, it’s a case of legislating via the judiciary.  https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/03/us/politics/same-sex-marriage-document-supreme-court.html It sounds like all parties are in agreement that the initial lawsuit in Colorado was entirely based on a foundation of completely false information.  Presumably it was some sort of joke or prank,  Here’s what I don’t understand:  how in the HELL does a farcical lawsuit with  literally no foundation whatsoever manage to work its up through the judicial system to the point where SCOTUS hears it and makes a ruling?  How the hell was this case not dismissed by a lower court?  How did it even make it far enough to be  submitted for SCOTUS consideration?    Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted July 4, 2023 Report Share Posted July 4, 2023 Citizens United was also pushed through in a very shady manner MadMax, and pat 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted July 12, 2023 Report Share Posted July 12, 2023 pat, tgo, MadMax, and 1 other 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted July 12, 2023 Report Share Posted July 12, 2023 26 minutes ago, Starkiller said: The end result was obvious. What I want to see now is a business ban gay people (it's only a matter of time) and have a gay person cross state lines and bring this all the way back to the Hearts of Atlanta case whereby interstate commerce is not allowed to be encroached upon based on discrimination. It would be a very interesting case.  @TitansPDO what do you think? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted November 14, 2023 Report Share Posted November 14, 2023 SCORRUPTUS is adopting a new code of ethics for justices, which I expect they will promptly ignore…  https://www.npr.org/2023/11/13/1212737849/the-supreme-court-is-now-adopting-a-code-of-ethics-for-justices Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chef Posted November 14, 2023 Report Share Posted November 14, 2023 11 hours ago, Starkiller said: SCORRUPTUS is adopting a new code of ethics for justices, which I expect they will promptly ignore…  https://www.npr.org/2023/11/13/1212737849/the-supreme-court-is-now-adopting-a-code-of-ethics-for-justices Starkiller 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted February 6 Report Share Posted February 6 In case anyone is interested, SCOTUS will be streaming oral arguments for the case concerning Trump being on the Colorado ballot on Rhursday at 10:00ET https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted February 8 Report Share Posted February 8 On 2/6/2024 at 12:21 PM, Starkiller said: In case anyone is interested, SCOTUS will be streaming oral arguments for the case concerning Trump being on the Colorado ballot on Rhursday at 10:00ET https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx  It's going to get overturned. Starkiller, and IsntLifeFunny 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted February 18 Report Share Posted February 18 https://apnews.com/article/amazon-nlrb-unconstitutional-union-labor-459331e9b77f5be0e5202c147654993e  Amazon is arguing in a legal filing that the 88-year-old National Labor Relations Board is unconstitutional, echoing similar arguments made this year by Elon Musk’s SpaceX and the grocery store chain Trader Joe’s in disputes about workers’ rights and organizing.  The Amazon filing, made Thursday, came in response to a case before an administrative law judge overseeing a complaint from agency prosecutors who allege the company unlawfully retaliated against workers at a New York City warehouse who voted to unionize nearly two years ago.  In its filing, Amazon denies many of the charges and asks for the complaint to be dismissed. The company’s attorneys then go further, arguing that the structure of the agency — particularly limits on the removal of administrative law judges and five board members appointed by the president — violates the separation of powers and infringes on executive powers stipulated in the Constitution. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted February 19 Report Share Posted February 19 Â begooode, MadMax, and IsntLifeFunny 1 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted March 4 Report Share Posted March 4 As expected, SCOTUS ruled (unanimously) that Colorado couldn’t remove Trump from the primary ballot Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OilerTitanHybrid Posted March 4 Report Share Posted March 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
begooode Posted March 4 Report Share Posted March 4 Trump will grandstand on this outcome, and with his Super Tuesday results will generate a lot of positive messaging for him for the week. I'm just glad there is clarity on the issue and it's sorted out now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.