Come on Titans Posted July 2 Report Share Posted July 2 just sharing... OILERMAN 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post pat Posted July 4 Popular Post Report Share Posted July 4 It’s confirmed that there is no substance to the wedding designer case.  In the absence of any facts of a person actually forced to work against their principles, it’s a case of legislating via the judiciary.  https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/03/us/politics/same-sex-marriage-document-supreme-court.html IsntLifeFunny, Come on Titans, MadMax, and 2 others 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nine Posted July 4 Report Share Posted July 4 2 hours ago, pat said: It’s confirmed that there is no substance to the wedding designer case.  In the absence of any facts of a person actually forced to work against their principles, it’s a case of legislating via the judiciary.  https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/03/us/politics/same-sex-marriage-document-supreme-court.html It sounds like all parties are in agreement that the initial lawsuit in Colorado was entirely based on a foundation of completely false information.  Presumably it was some sort of joke or prank,  Here’s what I don’t understand:  how in the HELL does a farcical lawsuit with  literally no foundation whatsoever manage to work its up through the judicial system to the point where SCOTUS hears it and makes a ruling?  How the hell was this case not dismissed by a lower court?  How did it even make it far enough to be  submitted for SCOTUS consideration?    Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted July 4 Report Share Posted July 4 Citizens United was also pushed through in a very shady manner MadMax, and pat 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted July 12 Report Share Posted July 12 MadMax, IsntLifeFunny, tgo, and 1 other 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted July 12 Report Share Posted July 12 26 minutes ago, Starkiller said: The end result was obvious. What I want to see now is a business ban gay people (it's only a matter of time) and have a gay person cross state lines and bring this all the way back to the Hearts of Atlanta case whereby interstate commerce is not allowed to be encroached upon based on discrimination. It would be a very interesting case.  @TitansPDO what do you think? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted November 14 Report Share Posted November 14 SCORRUPTUS is adopting a new code of ethics for justices, which I expect they will promptly ignore…  https://www.npr.org/2023/11/13/1212737849/the-supreme-court-is-now-adopting-a-code-of-ethics-for-justices Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chef Posted November 14 Report Share Posted November 14 11 hours ago, Starkiller said: SCORRUPTUS is adopting a new code of ethics for justices, which I expect they will promptly ignore…  https://www.npr.org/2023/11/13/1212737849/the-supreme-court-is-now-adopting-a-code-of-ethics-for-justices Starkiller 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.