Jump to content

Titans vs Bengals Week 12 Discussion


AussieTitanFan08
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, oldschool said:

I expect a good game. The Bengals D is under rated imo and we know their offense can score. I'm sure the Titans want revenge for the playoff game but they can't let that be the focus.

I want this to be a revenge game for Tannehill and him alone. If we are going to win a SB it's because he keeps throwing like he has the past two weeks. And there's zero doubt the playoff game fucked his mind sideways. I hope he has revenge on his mind with the idea of putting them out of the playoffs. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 506
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Need to get Downing on the sauce early if we're gonna pull this off

Personal growth and reflection are not allowed in this community 

Posted Images

2 hours ago, BudsOilers said:

Because it doesn't fit their narrative that Downing is a buffoon.  

 

 

So you're good with the Titans extending Downing for a couple more years? 

 

Edit: People had the pitchforks out for Bowen a couple years ago, and now our defense is playing well.

 

I'm just curious if you think Downing is a good OC. 

Edited by Alzarius
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheBukafax said:

It’s not random. It’s fancy play calling versus simplicity and the ensuing result. I’m using it as a recent example of a successful fancy play. I could also have used the Henry throw at the GL.

 

Every single failed fancy play hell even incomplete throws or sacks on 3rd and short have had cries for Henry to be running it. 
 

Had that Henry run on 4th and 1 been successful, this board would have lauded the call as the correct choice. It wasn’t so it’s considered a bad call.

These are overly broad statements. You do know a lot of different people post here, yes? 

 

So besides all that, what are your thoughts on the end around to Chig with a chance to put the game away, the read option to Willis that fumbled, and the running Henry into a stacked box? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Alzarius said:

 

 

So you're good with the Titans extending Downing for a couple more years? 

I'm going to answer for Bud:

 

Of course not you idiot. I didn't say that. What I said was that what others are saying about him not calling plays is completely wrong. He's obviously calling the plays. 

 

As to what they do in the offseason, that's up to Vrabel. Pass blocking. Receivers. Run your fucking routes! Get back to pass blocking. Oh yeah, Henry is solid some of the time and looks good this year some of the time. 

 

Now, don't worry about Downing because Vrabel. Kelly sucks, but Vrabel. Robinson will fuck something up I'm sure of it. 

 

Okay? Break. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

These are overly broad statements. You do know a lot of different people post here, yes? 

 

So besides all that, what are your thoughts on the end around to Chig with a chance to put the game away, the read option to Willis that fumbled, and the running Henry into a stacked box? 

They are broad because I’m looking at it from the point of it being a general consensus from the gameday threads.

 

I didn’t mind either the Henry run or the Malik option. I don’t remember much from the Chig end around but I do remember not liking that one.

 

I can speak more on the Henry run and why I liked it since it’s the most recent. I’m not sure if it’s the optimal call or not but I liked it since Henry had run a ton on that drive. The D would have been feeling it after a 10 min drive. A negative result on the play would have left GB in a tough spot to drive. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheBukafax said:

They are broad because I’m looking at it from the point of it being a general consensus from the gameday threads.

 

I didn’t mind either the Henry run or the Malik option. I don’t remember much from the Chig end around but I do remember not liking that one.

 

I can speak more on the Henry run and why I liked it since it’s the most recent. I’m not sure if it’s the optimal call or not but I liked it since Henry had run a ton on that drive. The D would have been feeling it after a 10 min drive. A negative result on the play would have left GB in a tough spot to drive. 

They were all terrible calls and none of them had anything to do with the outcome. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, rns90 said:

I like how Vrabel is getting  blamed now even though he didn't make the pick.  And it's obvious that Vrabel rather not play him and realizes what an awful qb Willis is.

Yeah… I’ve heard that Robinson called down and told Vrabel he had to play Willis in the Denver game…

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, TheBukafax said:

Why though? What specifically made them bad calls? The Henry run was a single whiffed block from being successful.

You don't run a sweep to a rookie TE in FG range in the 4th. Regardless of outcome it's a bad call. There's other options to run the sweep and don't run the sweep.

 

You don't do pure drops with Willis with an 8 point lead with 8 minutes left. You run the ball and get in FG range. 2 possessions is all that matters. 

 

You don't take Tannehill out of the game...ever. Simply stupid. You definitely don't do it in the 4th quarter in FG range on 3rd and 1. Any play call is better. 

 

You don't run heavy personnel with Henry on 4th against a 10 man box. I understand the argument for execution, but that doesn't make it anything resembling a good playcall. They knew what was coming and ate it. 

 

Regardless of the outcome I would have thought all of those were terrible calls. They were in fact terrible calls. The fact they all failed doesn't somehow minimize them being terrible lol. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

You don't run a sweep to a rookie TE in FG range in the 4th. Regardless of outcome it's a bad call. There's other options to run the sweep and don't run the sweep.

 

You don't do pure drops with Willis with an 8 point lead with 8 minutes left. You run the ball and get in FG range. 2 possessions is all that matters. 

 

You don't take Tannehill out of the game...ever. Simply stupid. You definitely don't do it in the 4th quarter in FG range on 3rd and 1. Any play call is better. 

 

You don't run heavy personnel with Henry on 4th against a 10 man box. I understand the argument for execution, but that doesn't make it anything resembling a good playcall. They knew what was coming and ate it. 

 

Regardless of the outcome I would have thought all of those were terrible calls. They were in fact terrible calls. The fact they all failed doesn't somehow minimize them being terrible lol. 

 

 

Yeah I didn’t like the Chig sweep, it’s just too much lateral movement.

 

Im not arguing those Malik passes. We agree there.

 

The Malik fumble I’m sure there might be better calls but I can’t see it being a bad call. Instead of attempting to conflict the D between pass or run, they gave them a conflict on who was to run on an obvious running down. I think we will just have a difference of opinion on this one.

 

They got a 10 man box because the personnel dictated it. What would you have rather seen for the play? 

Edited by TheBukafax
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Jonboy unpinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...