AussieTitanFan08 Posted January 25, 2022 Report Share Posted January 25, 2022 Just now, Bcap88 said: I don’t think you can shed Julio though, whose gonna be wr2 and don’t say nwi because he stinks.Julio seems like he loves it here I’m sure you can get him to restructure I got the impression from Vrabel today he is frustrated with the whole Julio hamstring saga, while not the ideal route you can designate him a June 1st cut and save cap space that way. AvgJoe 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieTitanFan08 Posted January 25, 2022 Report Share Posted January 25, 2022 6 minutes ago, Bcap88 said: The problem with Landry is which one are we going to get ? The 5.5 sack one ? Or the 12 sack Landry ? My guess is neither and prob somewhere in the middle. I’m not entirely sure you shell out cash for Landry though at this point he’s a luxury and with autry Simmons and dupree(who should be fully healthy next year ) all locked up next year you can prob and play a cheaper option and get the same amount of production Listen to the way Vrabel talks about Landry and how much he values his versatility/durability/leadership he isn't going anywhere. titanskick8851, and AvgJoe 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bcap88 Posted January 25, 2022 Report Share Posted January 25, 2022 1 minute ago, AussieTitanFan08 said: I got the impression from Vrabel today he is frustrated with the whole Julio hamstring saga, while not the ideal route you can designate him a June 1st cut and save cap space that way. I’m just speaking from a production standpoint, who can step in and play wr2 you cut Julio and you are going to bank on a rookie or a mediocre fa signing. I think everyone including Julio himself was frustrated with the hamstring. He looked great against cincy and Houston, his lack of production has fallen partially on Julio hamstring and drownings inability to get him the targets and chemsitry lacking between him and tannehill. I think you roll the dice and see what next year holds, you only save 9 million which isn’t even going to be enough to get a wr without bargain hopping. Be an interesting decision, cut him this year and save 9 million or cut him next off season and save 11 No1TitansFan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
japan Posted January 25, 2022 Report Share Posted January 25, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, Righteous said: Tannehill has won 1 more playoff game than Mariota. We’ve won the division two years in a row and have had home playoff games in those years. While Tannehill doesn’t look like the guy to take us to the super bowl, he has helped the team establish a winning transition. More-so than Mariota ever did. Edited January 25, 2022 by japan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bcap88 Posted January 25, 2022 Report Share Posted January 25, 2022 I’m no cap guru but if tbe saints can get out of a 100 million dollar hole the titans can find a way to create cap space titanskick8851 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bcap88 Posted January 25, 2022 Report Share Posted January 25, 2022 I do know for sure that you will prob see a mini overhaul on offense like they did with the defense Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieTitanFan08 Posted January 25, 2022 Report Share Posted January 25, 2022 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Bcap88 said: I’m no cap guru but if tbe saints can get out of a 100 million dollar hole the titans can find a way to create cap space The Saints didn't get out of a $100 million hole they just pushed it forward another year they are $78 million over the 2022 cap and don't have a QB, their HC might also walk away. Edited January 25, 2022 by AussieTitanFan08 Starkiller, and tgo 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted January 25, 2022 Report Share Posted January 25, 2022 17 minutes ago, cenj said: Does this not fall on JRob? TE for sure. WR is less heinous after the top two than people suggest but that's not too say it is or was actively good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
XAEA12 Posted January 25, 2022 Report Share Posted January 25, 2022 2 hours ago, Righteous said: Not only did Tannehill lose the game, he is potentially costing people their jobs. If I am Robinson and Vrabel, I am getting a QB because they both won’t be around much longer hitching their careers to RT. This actually crossed my mind too. Robinson will want a chance at "his" QB and could ruin his goodwill if things don't improve keeping Tannehill. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgo Posted January 25, 2022 Report Share Posted January 25, 2022 6 minutes ago, Jamalisms said: TE for sure. WR is less heinous after the top two than people suggest but that's not too say it is or was actively good. Robinson almost always goes light at one position every offseason. TE was that position this year. Not saying the overall approach is necessarily ideal, but if you’re gonna do that then TE is one of the least valuable positions. We need to shore up the position though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted January 25, 2022 Report Share Posted January 25, 2022 4 minutes ago, Jamalisms said: TE for sure. WR is less heinous after the top two than people suggest but that's not too say it is or was actively good. Oh it's bad. Second straight year you have to throw to a stiff with your season on the line. And the only WR you do draft is so bad he gets cut before the season. The other FA just flat out quits in the middle of the season. And the big offseason acquistion was an injury bust. I think it might be worse given that the last two drafts were supposedly loaded with prospects and he came away with nothing out of that. Downtown 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Downtown Posted January 25, 2022 Report Share Posted January 25, 2022 1 minute ago, rns90 said: Oh it's bad. Second straight year you have to throw to a stiff with your season on the line. Julio wasn't even on the field. BOTH seasons also had your superstar number 1 WR coming open. That ain't a personnel problem. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Downtown Posted January 25, 2022 Report Share Posted January 25, 2022 Like Tannehill, I think Firkser earned the contract and the faith this season that he could be our guy at TE. He failed. Next. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted January 25, 2022 Report Share Posted January 25, 2022 2 minutes ago, rns90 said: Oh it's bad. Second straight year you have to throw to a stiff with your season on the line. And the only WR you do draft is so bad he gets cut before the season. The other FA just flat out quits in the middle of the season. And the big offseason acquistion was an injury bust. I think it might be worse given that the last two drafts were supposedly loaded with prospects and he came away with nothing out of that. When St Louis dude was released earlier this year, he had been passed over by others and the general sentiment here was that we had talent there. Maybe not great but a good handful of guys and it was just sour grapes. Then Tannehill had a terrible stretch having to rely on those guys and suddenly they're all dog shit stiffs and they were Tannehill's problem. Then Tannehill has his starters back but has another terrible game and it keeps getting cited that he threw to a "terrible player" one fucking time and even though there's no great complaint about the route or anything ... just the fact that he exists means it was a bad situation. Frankly, I think people are projecting confidence or excuses onto that position group and it has little to do with how good it bad they actually are. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted January 25, 2022 Report Share Posted January 25, 2022 7 minutes ago, Jamalisms said: Frankly, I think people are projecting confidence or excuses onto that position group and it has little to do with how good it bad they actually are. I disagree on this. Let's just take Tannehill out of the equation and assume he's a good qb (and not go into that discussion again). I mean when or after these guys get the ball, it's sort of obvious. It's just you can kind of tell they aren't good. I'm talking about guys like Rodgers/NWI etc. NWI has questionable hands and lacks that extra gear and Rodgers is JAG. I mean I can see and evaluate this things independent of the qb play. oldschool 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.