Jump to content

The Interception to Raymond


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, BudsOilers said:

 

The nfl game pass sideline angle shows it and as I referenced in the OP, NFLN magnified those two guys which is where it's apparent.  The left arm of Peters causes Raymond to fall.

 

Again, this is completely moot IF the ball was tipped which is inconclusive.

 

It's certainly not the worst PI call ever not called and a saavy move by Peters but Raymond definitely didn't just fall down on his own.

I don't think the ball was tipped

Wasn't really close

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The criticism on Tannehill is ridiculous. No one bitched last year when Tannehill went deep to Raymond in clutch situations. Next man up. Raymond ran into the defender and fell over; it was 100% Raymo

You dont make raymond the 1at read for the game deciding play of the season.   Thats the issue i have with this offense. We use almost everyone as interchangeable pieces and RT is a 1 read Q

So dumb.  I'm sure Tannehill, while going through his reads with defenders bearing down on him, thinks 'well, I know my first read is open, but he's a backup so I should move off him to the second rea

9 minutes ago, BudsOilers said:

 

The nfl game pass sideline angle shows it and as I referenced in the OP, NFLN magnified those two guys which is where it's apparent.  The left arm of Peters causes Raymond to fall.

 

Again, this is completely moot IF the ball was tipped which is inconclusive.

 

It's certainly not the worst PI call ever not called and a saavy move by Peters but Raymond definitely didn't just fall down on his own.

That's good enough for me then.  Moving on to next season...

Edited by OilerTitanHybrid
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, bizzyeddie said:

I think he's making the point that the coaches shouldn't be making raymond the first read at a crucial time of the game.

 

Tannehill didn't go thru any reads on that play

Ha ha. Do you understand how plays work? Davis was the 1st read on that play. He went out. His replacement was the first read. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, BudsOilers said:

 

No, people killed Marcus for not throwing it to the open read and then holding the ball to either get sacked or scramble for 3 yards.....Not to mention the inaccurate passes, off timed throws, etc.

 

And BTW. everyone here remembers what happened the last time dumb dumb had to play against the Ravens......0 points, 11 sacks (6 or 7 directly on him)......

Wrong

If you could replace marcus with tannehill for this one play then there would be no question it was the QBs fault.

The bias is insane.

 

And I know Mariota sucked and Im all in with tannehill but still...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, bizzyeddie said:

Wrong

If you could replace marcus with tannehill for this one play then there would be no question it was the QBs fault.

The bias is insane.

 

And I know Mariota sucked and Im all in with tannehill but still...

 

If they had replaced Tannehill with Marcus for this one play, Mariota likely would have never thrown the ball and been sacked.......

 

There's no bias here.  The INT most definitely had nothing to do with Tannehill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would assume this play had the safety as the first read post snap. He probably assumed the safety would head towards AJ Brown's side... but he didn't. Missed chance by Tannehill.  Ball probably should've gone to Brown. Happens.

 

But I haven't watched it since the game.

 

On to the draft.

Edited by reo
Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, BudsOilers said:

 

If they had replaced Tannehill with Marcus for this one play, Mariota likely would have never thrown the ball and been sacked.......

 

There's no bias here.  The INT most definitely had nothing to do with Tannehill.

Perfect

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, EagleEye said:

You guys crack me up.  OS and others think nothing wrong when RT makes a one read but kill Marcus for the same thing.  It's so hypocritical, it's insane.

After searching through post historys on this board... The biggest gripe was actually Mariota not knowing how to be a competent QB when his first read was taken away. He would either focus too much on it and not make a throw, get all flustered and frantic moving around waiting for the other reads or just scramble and usually right into a DLinemen.

Tell us again how Tannehill throwing to a guy who fell over is hypocritical.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, wiscotitansfan said:

After searching through post historys on this board... The biggest gripe was actually Mariota not knowing how to be a competent QB when his first read was taken away. He would either focus too much on it and not make a throw, get all flustered and frantic moving around waiting for the other reads or just scramble and usually right into a DLinemen.

Tell us again how Tannehill throwing to a guy who fell over is hypocritical.

 

There were plenty of examples where he had one read and for some reason wouldn't throw it or threw it off-timed too.  Just way to bad all around once the scouting report was out on him.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, BudsOilers said:

 

If they had replaced Tannehill with Marcus for this one play, Mariota likely would have never thrown the ball and been sacked.......

 

There's no bias here.  The INT most definitely had nothing to do with Tannehill.

If you truly believe that interception had nothing to do with tannehill then you are nuts.

No doubt that Raymond needs to stay on his feet and try to make s play or at least not allow the ball to be intercepted but the notion that tannehill did everything perfect is ridiculous.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, bizzyeddie said:

If you truly believe that interception had nothing to do with tannehill then you are nuts.

No doubt that Raymond needs to stay on his feet and try to make s play or at least not allow the ball to be intercepted but the notion that tannehill did everything perfect is ridiculous.

 

No, it merely shows you have no idea what you are talking about.  The interception was NOT Tannehill's fault. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, BudsOilers said:

 

No, people killed Marcus for not throwing it to the open read and then holding the ball to either get sacked or scramble for 3 yards.....Not to mention the inaccurate passes, off timed throws, etc.

 

And BTW. everyone here remembers what happened the last time dumb dumb had to play against the Ravens......0 points, 11 sacks (6 or 7 directly on him)......

Typical hypocritical response.  Different year same person.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, wiscotitansfan said:

Tell us again how Tannehill throwing to a guy who fell over is hypocritical.

Do you guys have reading deprivation?  I was talking about 1 read QB's and killing one but not the other.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...