LongTimeFan Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/tax-filings-reveal-biden-cancer-charity-spent-millions-on-salaries-zero-on-research What? A Biden fake charity? Lets see your outrage. Ex Pfizer executive makes $650,000 over 2 yrs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post reo Posted November 16, 2020 Popular Post Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 (edited) Looking into the charity, it doesn't seem like the point was to use it to directly fund research. http://www.jons-online.com/issues/2019/march-2019-vol-10-no-3/2324-the-biden-cancer-initiative Quote In establishing the Biden Cancer Initiative, Vice President Biden and Dr Jill Biden strengthened their commitment to bring together all stakeholders in the oncology space to reimagine how the government, academia, nonprofits, and the private sector can better organize their resources to improve cancer care. The initiative works closely with patients and patient organizations, cancer researchers, cancer centers, research universities, governments, private and philanthropic sectors, and organizations including the Academy of Oncology Nurse & Patient Navigators to identify and address the critical issues in cancer prevention, research, and care to drive new actions and collaborations to find cures. Doesn't look like the point of the charity was ever to directly fund research. If the above is their purpose then yeah... they'd spend most of their money on salaries. As per usual it seems as if you're being led around by your nose again..... Dude, you need to get away from Fox and now OANN, etc. Edited November 16, 2020 by reo tgo, Btowner, 'Nator, and 6 others 4 4 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 I missed the part of the article that claims there was something illegal going on like with the Trump Foundation... tgo, and Btowner 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titans279 Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 There's nothing in this article that points to anything being illegal or even unethical. They never claimed they would spend the money on funding cancer research. Literally the opposite according to the Interview above lol Quote JONS: Can you describe the methods to achieve your mission? Mr Simon: The point of the Biden Cancer Initiative is not to fund projects, interfere with regulatory decisions, or to lobby. We do not give grants, we do not touch patient data, we are not a silo of genomic information. Instead, we’re looking for efficiencies that can be implemented and addressing cultural issues that might be slowing us down— the brakes we are leaving on while we drive the car, so to speak. Our goal is to work with the different organizations to figure out how they can double what they’re doing. When problems arise, we’ll address it by assessing solutions that already exist. We want to enrich the possibilities to scale a ubiquitous solution to a local solution. We focus on creating the solutions to the problems that we know already exist, elevating collaborations and new efforts that improve patient outcomes and save lives. reo, tgo, and IsntLifeFunny 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
No1TitansFan Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 Charities tend to work in two different fashions. Some serve as a clearinghouse, people donate money to them and they in turn distribute those funds to various all ready established organizations, they're not trying to reinvent the wheel. Other charities, the Clinton foundation is one of them, collect money and then try to come up with innovative solutions to long term problems; before getting money, prospective recipients have to submit a plan of action of how their solution will work better than previous approaches that haven't been entirely effective. The Biden initiative was definitely the latter. Biden himself admitted that by pulling his name out of it was risking cutting it off before they really got started; he did so to avoid the conflict of interest of appearing to solicit contributions for later political influence. Downtown 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 So a LTF post that isn't pointing to rampant and clear election fraud. Telling? Btowner, reo, and MamlngEnvy 1 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Downtown Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 48 minutes ago, LongTimeFan said: https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/tax-filings-reveal-biden-cancer-charity-spent-millions-on-salaries-zero-on-research What? A Biden fake charity? Lets see your outrage. Ex Pfizer executive makes $650,000 over 2 yrs. You can't be this gullible. The whole point of this organization is to act as a fund raising vehicle (and organizing entity) akin to a high profile consultant service acting as a cancer think-tank. So yes, their whole purpose is not and never was research related! How astute of you to pull a fart out of the thin air and acknowledge this. SMH. freakingeek, and reo 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Downtown Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 3 minutes ago, No1TitansFan said: Charities tend to work in two different fashions. Some serve as a clearinghouse, people donate money to them and they in turn distribute those funds to various all ready established organizations, they're not trying to reinvent the wheel. Other charities, the Clinton foundation is one of them, collect money and then try to come up with innovative solutions to long term problems; before getting money, prospective recipients have to submit a plan of action of how their solution will work better than previous approaches that haven't been entirely effective. The Biden initiative was definitely the latter. Biden himself admitted that by pulling his name out of it was risking cutting it off before they really got started; he did so to avoid the conflict of interest of appearing to solicit contributions for later political influence. You said this way better than me. Thank you. I do, however, fear for our country when you have people like @LongTimeFan than can be mislead so blatantly and willingly. Btowner, reo, and MamlngEnvy 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post MadMax Posted November 16, 2020 Popular Post Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 It's LTF.. Why bother? 'Nator, begooode, Starkiller, and 2 others 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzTitan Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 The whole point of a dodgy foundation/charity is you don't spend the money in the way you promised when you raised the money. Does that describe this? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MamlngEnvy Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 Great...now all the tards who swore off Facebook for Parler and are already back on Facebook 12 hours Later are gonna be like “WELLL WELLL WELLL IT WAS A PLANDEMIC ALL ALong!” IsntLifeFunny 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanruss Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 Haha OP is an idiot .... again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post OILERMAN Posted November 16, 2020 Popular Post Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 I know someone who really did have a fake charity Downtown, Number9, reo, and 5 others 2 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJClown Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 10 hours ago, LongTimeFan said: https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/tax-filings-reveal-biden-cancer-charity-spent-millions-on-salaries-zero-on-research What? A Biden fake charity? Lets see your outrage. Ex Pfizer executive makes $650,000 over 2 yrs. What law was broken? Be specific Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJClown Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 10 hours ago, LongTimeFan said: https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/tax-filings-reveal-biden-cancer-charity-spent-millions-on-salaries-zero-on-research QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources. Overall, we rate Daily Mail Right Biased and Questionable due to numerous failed fact checks and poor sourcing of information. Detailed Report Reasoning: Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Some Fake News, Numerous Failed Fact Checks Country: United Kingdom World Press Freedom Rank: UK 35/180 https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-mail/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.