mmmmmbeeer Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 8 hours ago, Mercalius said: Exactly. Not only are you full of shit, you’re terrified of even remotely disputing what I’ve claimed when directly called out. You’ll call me a liar and insult me, but God forbid you challenge my declarations because you know you’d factually and verbally be drawn and quartered. You were pegged the moment you placed the Squad over the Torah simply because politics > moral truth. Another TDS basic bitch. I love it when the ignorant try to sound intelligent. QTard -- "2+2=5!" Normal, mentally healthy person -- "No, it doesn't." QTard -- "Prove me wrong! You can't! " Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 8 hours ago, Mercalius said: The clear insinuation is that if Hunter Biden’s financials (not Joe’s) are investigated it would create a plausible line back to enriching his father in employment ventures and meetings/arrangements that were gained based on his father’s influence. This isn’t hard. It’s irrefutably more evidence even in its bare bones state than what the impeachment hoax was propagated over. And this doesn’t even include the bad optics of the crack/meth pipe photos and purported sextape/pictures that are already spreading online with more drug use photographed (snorting a line off someone’s ass). And to help with the homework - the implication is that Burisma was seeking big financial opportunity outside of Ukraine. Namely the EU and China. Hence why Joe randomly meeting with their heads and bragging about getting the DA investigating them fired by threatening their financial aide is, at the minimum, suspicious - when he was primarily responsible for those considerations and his completely unqualified son held a massive position in the company. It was bad optics before the emails. It’s terrible after. An “October Surprise” that’s politically aimed at smearing the Bidens? Absolutely. But untruthful? TBD. So you got that from "hey thanks for letting me meet your dad" and some working deals with China that said "the big H"? OILERMAN 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pat Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 I heard that Hunter Biden was a better quarterback than Josh Allen. Care to comment? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgo Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 (edited) Lol Biden spox throwing shade (this isn't Biden's house obv). There's been a pic going around of Biden's house that he bought in 1972 for 180k and is worth a couple million now and they're making a huge deal of it. I personally know multiple people with bigger/better/more valuable houses than Biden Edited October 19, 2020 by tgo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgo Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 scine09, and titanruss 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 17 minutes ago, tgo said: Every time I see a photo of Giuliani I laugh and cringe at the same time because of his never ending ability to make crazed faces. tgo 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
begooode Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 Even the Fox guys passed on the IF TRUE angle. You know it's some shite. These are the guys who've promised Bigger Than Watergate at every opportunity, but said 'naw, bro. I can't sell that here. Take it to a lower tier in the echo chamber and we'll play the twitter game -- amplify the innuendo to create legitimacy; where there's a lot of smoke, etc,...' tgo 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Starkiller Posted October 19, 2020 Popular Post Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 (edited) 33 minutes ago, tgo said: There may be something to this story. I hear he is about to move here: Edited October 19, 2020 by Starkiller begooode, Justafan, scine09, and 3 others 4 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongTimeFan Posted October 19, 2020 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 Both houses of Congress have specific regulations concerning gifts that may be accepted by Members and staff. The term “gift” covers any gratuity, favor, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, or other item having monetary value. In particular, the term includes services, training, transportation, lodging and meals, whether provided in kind, by purchase of a ticket, payment in advance, or reimbursement after the expense has been incurred. A gift is deemed to be “accepted” if a Member or employee of Congress exercises dominion over or control of the gift. It does not matter whether it would be used personally by the individual or anybody else. A gift to a family member or any other individual is considered a gift to the Member or employee of Congress if there is reason to believe the gift was given because of his/her official position. The question is a salary to a family member considered a gift and if the VP falls under this provision. Jamalisms, Starkiller, and Justafan 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgo Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 12 minutes ago, LongTimeFan said: Both houses of Congress have specific regulations concerning gifts that may be accepted by Members and staff. The term “gift” covers any gratuity, favor, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, or other item having monetary value. In particular, the term includes services, training, transportation, lodging and meals, whether provided in kind, by purchase of a ticket, payment in advance, or reimbursement after the expense has been incurred. A gift is deemed to be “accepted” if a Member or employee of Congress exercises dominion over or control of the gift. It does not matter whether it would be used personally by the individual or anybody else. A gift to a family member or any other individual is considered a gift to the Member or employee of Congress if there is reason to believe the gift was given because of his/her official position. The question is a salary to a family member considered a gift and if the VP falls under this provision. /facepalm IsntLifeFunny, Justafan, and No1TitansFan 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post IsntLifeFunny Posted October 19, 2020 Popular Post Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 This gif just keeps on trucking along. You could say the gif that keeps on giving. Justafan, oldschool, tgo, and 4 others 7 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 I’ll see myself out Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanruss Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 1 hour ago, LongTimeFan said: Both houses of Congress have specific regulations concerning gifts that may be accepted by Members and staff. The term “gift” covers any gratuity, favor, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, or other item having monetary value. In particular, the term includes services, training, transportation, lodging and meals, whether provided in kind, by purchase of a ticket, payment in advance, or reimbursement after the expense has been incurred. A gift is deemed to be “accepted” if a Member or employee of Congress exercises dominion over or control of the gift. It does not matter whether it would be used personally by the individual or anybody else. A gift to a family member or any other individual is considered a gift to the Member or employee of Congress if there is reason to believe the gift was given because of his/her official position. The question is a salary to a family member considered a gift and if the VP falls under this provision. The really really funny part of CONs begging for this to be a story is the about 157 times Trump and his family and friends did this exact thing and did it publicly and even announced it half the time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 (edited) 3 hours ago, titanruss said: The really really funny part of CONs begging for this to be a story is the about 157 times Trump and his family and friends did this exact thing and did it publicly and even announced it half the time. Yup. Like being okay with Trump and others using their personal phones for government business including email. Hypocrits, the entire lot. Edited October 19, 2020 by oldschool titanruss 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted October 20, 2020 Report Share Posted October 20, 2020 SpLeEnBeAnS, OILERMAN, pat, and 1 other 1 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.