Popular Post Jonboy Posted February 2, 2020 Popular Post Report Share Posted February 2, 2020 Justafan, SuperFreak90, rns90, and 5 others 6 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted February 2, 2020 Report Share Posted February 2, 2020 Oh, there has never been a moment where I thought he would hit free agency. Just a question of how much they pay him or if they have to tag him. reo, SuperFreak90, OILERMAN, and 1 other 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post woolfolksunclesuncle Posted February 2, 2020 Popular Post Report Share Posted February 2, 2020 Haha....the report that the Pats would give Brady 30 million for the upcoming season makes this public show of affection for Tannehill suspicious AND hilarious! oldschool, luvyablue256, rns90, and 2 others 3 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted February 2, 2020 Report Share Posted February 2, 2020 9 minutes ago, JoelinBellevue said: What's not to like? Clean cut, dynamic, great arm, good runner.....but most importantly his babe looks a lot better in yoga pants than Grassu. He ain't lyin'^ TNTitans, Bluth, titansjr9988, and 1 other 1 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post OILERMAN Posted February 2, 2020 Popular Post Report Share Posted February 2, 2020 Yea no kidding I also never thought there was a chance he'd leave or they wouldn't extend him You don't strike gold with Tannehill then sign a 43 old has been, that was ridiculous kgsTitan, Pragidealist, Number9, and 5 others 8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokeater Posted February 2, 2020 Report Share Posted February 2, 2020 Yeah, this is a no brainer decision. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted February 2, 2020 Report Share Posted February 2, 2020 There is mutual interest in a new contract and a deal to be made. Titans won't use the tag. OILERMAN 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
headhunter Posted February 2, 2020 Report Share Posted February 2, 2020 Good news Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number9 Posted February 2, 2020 Report Share Posted February 2, 2020 A deal is superior to the tag. JT2000 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post IrishTitansFan Posted February 2, 2020 Popular Post Report Share Posted February 2, 2020 I don't care how much they give Tannehill per year as long as they can get out of the deal relatively easily after a couple of years. The regression to the mean possibility is real whether people want to admit it or not. If he keeps this play up he's worth whatever he's getting a year Former_Fan, oldschool, Supdawg, and 3 others 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepingTitan Posted February 2, 2020 Report Share Posted February 2, 2020 The real questions: is this about money for Brady? How much are the Titans willing to sac to sign Tannehill? We got a lot of cheddar wrapped up in Lewis, Butler, Wake, and Walker. Cap hits Lewis: 5.1m Butler: 13.3m Walker: 8m Wake: 8.2 There's $34m right there. You sign Tannehill and Henry. Tag Conklin. Transition Ryan. And move on to another championship. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
socaltitan Posted February 2, 2020 Report Share Posted February 2, 2020 They'll keep Tannehill one way or another. The notion of a Newton, Bridgewater, or Winston is ridiculous. I do think an Alex Smith/Mahomes situation is very possible in a year or two. Ultimately, JR may want a chance to get his guy at QB whether that's Jordan Love or a 2021 QB. TNTitans, and Bluth 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scine09 Posted February 2, 2020 Report Share Posted February 2, 2020 42 minutes ago, SleepingTitan said: The real questions: is this about money for Brady? How much are the Titans willing to sac to sign Tannehill? We got a lot of cheddar wrapped up in Lewis, Butler, Wake, and Walker. Cap hits Lewis: 5.1m Butler: 13.3m Walker: 8m Wake: 8.2 There's $34m right there. You sign Tannehill and Henry. Tag Conklin. Transition Ryan. And move on to another championship. Another? I’m pretty sure no one on this board cares about 1960 or 1961. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JT2000 Posted February 2, 2020 Popular Post Report Share Posted February 2, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, IrishTitansFan said: I don't care how much they give Tannehill per year as long as they can get out of the deal relatively easily after a couple of years. The regression to the mean possibility is real whether people want to admit it or not. If he keeps this play up he's worth whatever he's getting a year I agree with most of what you are saying but you used a term that I see used a lot that I don't think is being used accurately - "regressing to a mean". The idea that any system will regress to its mean or average performance implies that the system being observed is static or unchanging. I use statistics at work and when a statistically different level of performance happens their are two main possibilities. One, it's a statistical "fluke", like tossing a coin and getting 10 heads in a row. Second, something in the system has changed or there is an outside influence causing the difference. Basically you can believe: 1. The season is just a statistical anomaly 2. The Titans were so much better than the Dolphins that RT's numbers reflect that. 3. RT has improved over time and the mean for his play has shifted up. But saying a return to the previous "mean" or average is inevitable discounts the possibility that RT performs better with a good running game and at least an average pass blocking line or he has actually improved. Edited February 2, 2020 by JT2000 Supdawg, CreepingDeath, prometheus, and 3 others 5 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishTitansFan Posted February 2, 2020 Report Share Posted February 2, 2020 3 minutes ago, JT2000 said: I agree with most of what you are saying but you used a term that I see used a lot that I don't think is being used accurately - "regressing to a mean". The idea that any system will regress to its mean or average performance implies that the system being observed is static or unchanging. I use statistics at work and when a statistically different level of performance happens their are two main possibilities. One, it's a statistical "fluke", like tossing a coin and getting 10 heads in a row. Second, something in the system has changed or there is an outside influence causing the difference. Basically you can believe: 1. The season is just a statistical anomaly 2. The Titans were so much better than the Dolphins that RT's numbers reflect that. 3. RT has improved over time and the mean for his play has shifted up. But saying a return to the previous "mean" or average is inevitable discounts the possibility that RT performs better with a good running game and at least an average pass blocking line or he has actually improved. Of course. But I mean there was 7 years body of work so it’s more likely that he regresses a little bit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.