Jump to content

Brady to Titans Rumors


Mercalius

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

If they let Tannehill go and sign washed up Brady we're total retards    

I’m so tired of these Monday Morning QB takes after every playoff game. Whoever wins, we should’ve gotten them, or they’re way better, or they don’t choke like our guy.    What happened to the

They may call it free agency season but let’s be honest on this board it’s @AussieTitanFan08 season.

Posted Images

1 hour ago, rns90 said:

If they do this they'd better go all in, and sign a pass rusher in FA and maybe another CB.  Not sure what they do at OT.    But if you sign Brady, you have sky high expectations and anything less is a failure.  Pressure will be on Vrabel to not fuck up.  And also bring in another K for competition for Joseph.

That’s really the only reason you make this move, if you think your current team could have won with Brady at QB and some upgrades. Then the plan is selling the future for a SB now. You would go all-in on the short-term plan and spend to make a monster that just needs a leader who can win in the playoffs:

 

-Sign back all of your key FAs.

-Even sign back Walker for the leadership role and playoff run. Those leaders are valuable. 
-Add a competent K.  

-Add two impact FAs on Def. Most likely pass rush. You can spend with the short term money savings. 
-In theory you are also adding Butler back at CB for the playoffs. 
-Draft for impact that can contribute early (RB in the 1st, athletic LBs, etc. 
 

Outside of Edelman, you have upgraded every spot on O for Brady and made a guy like Humphries even more valuable. A RB like D’Andre Swift in the 1st when paired with Henry really gives you a bruising running game to lean on all year. 
 

On D, you’re assembling even more pieces to a very solid core. 
 

Either way, win or lose, you’re going to need to address a whole new QB in 2 years and restart. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, freakingeek said:

Tannehill’s legs are alone enough to earn him the position over Brady. He used them perfectly this year and made several big plays running. I think he can make every throw Brady could make. If we let Tanne walk and sign Brady, we’re taking a big step back from the progress we made this season. I am against it. It would scream nepotism

 

Agree with your point wholeheartedly but 

cary elwes GIF

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tgo said:

 

Agree with your point wholeheartedly but 

cary elwes GIF

 

Nepotism; noun

the practice among those with power or influence of favoring relatives or friends, especially by giving them jobs.

 

I meant the “Patriot” family.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is not about "selling the future."  You can win now with Brady and then find a replacement for two years down the line.

 

If they think that Brady gives them a better chance to win than Tannehill then why is this "selling the future?"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...