Righteous Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 2 minutes ago, Callidus said: Everyone of them would be a downgrade 2 tanny except brees and he is old and likely not leaving the saints. Dak would be a upgrade but i doubt he leaves dallas and would cost a fortune. I would take Winston and Bridgewater over Tannehill right now. Both have star quality and will benefit greatly from a good running game. I doubt if either would require the big money that Tannehill will ask for. oldschool, C_Train, and japan 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadMax Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 2 minutes ago, Callidus said: Everyone of them would be a downgrade 2 tanny except brees and he is old and likely not leaving the saints. Dak would be a upgrade but i doubt he leaves dallas and would cost a fortune. Dak? The same Dak who can't hit a bull in the ass with a bass fiddle in Dallas? That Dak? Mariota would throw 7,000 yards and go undefeated with that team and Dak would be an upgrade over Tannehill? DAK????? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
charleytolar Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 3 minutes ago, Righteous said: I am saying a mediocre QB making it to the AFC Championship game doesn’t guarantee a big contract or future success. He was better than mediocre... at least the stats say so. A QB cannot outperform the game plan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Righteous Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 Just now, MadMax said: Dak? The same Dak who can't hit a bull in the ass with a bass fiddle in Dallas? That Dak? Mariota would throw 7,000 yards and go undefeated with that team and Dak would be an upgrade over Tannehill? DAK????? Yeah, a two time pro bowler, 2 time division winner wouldn’t be an upgrade over a player that has never won a division on been to the pro bowl in 7 years and threw for a total of 325 yds in 3 playoff games. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Righteous Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 (edited) 4 minutes ago, charleytolar said: He was better than mediocre... at least the stats say so. A QB cannot outperform the game plan. Tannehill was terrible in the second half. And that had nothing to do with game plan. Also 6 prior years of playing QB have shown that he is the very definition of mediocre. Edited January 20, 2020 by Righteous Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 4 minutes ago, Righteous said: I would take Winston and Bridgewater over Tannehill right now. Both have star quality and will benefit greatly from a good running game. I doubt if either would require the big money that Tannehill will ask for. If wr started winston we would be lucky to win 4 games. Teddy is decent but he isn't better than tanny. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadMax Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 2 minutes ago, Righteous said: Yeah, a two time pro bowler, 2 time division winner wouldn’t be an upgrade over a player that has never won a division on been to the pro bowl in 7 years and threw for a total of 325 yds in 3 playoff games. Yeah, pro bowlers are always great. *cough* VY *cough* Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Righteous Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 1 minute ago, MadMax said: Yeah, pro bowlers are always great. *cough* VY *cough* Right...so history tells you that you don’t reward one year of success, rather 10 games with a massive contract, correct? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 All the dumbass posters are coming out of the woodwork. Winston and Bridgewater have star power? lol sunworshipper, Callidus, and MadMax 1 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TennTitans23 Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 It was obvious yesterday that Tannehill isn’t the caliber of QB that can take the game over and put the team on his back. And there’s nothing wrong with that. There’s probably less than 5 of those guys in the entire league. The team isn’t built in that way, either. With all that said, though if Jrob sees a guy next year or in the future that he thinks CAN be that guy, then you pull the trigger. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BudsOilers Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 7 minutes ago, Righteous said: Tannehill was terrible in the second half. And that had nothing to do with game plan. Also 6 prior years of playing QB have shown that he is the very definition of mediocre. No he wasn't. Play calling was a much bigger issue while the game was still winnable. NashvilleNinja 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titans279 Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 We should just sign someone like Case Keenum to be the backup to Tannehill. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 Tannehill wasn't Blake Bortles. Did Bortles ever lead the league in passer rating? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Righteous Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 (edited) 11 minutes ago, BudAdams said: No he wasn't. Play calling was a much bigger issue while the game was still winnable. Take away the drive vs prevent and Tannehill was 4-8 for 27 yds and 2 sacks in the 2nd half. That deserves $30M a year. Edited January 20, 2020 by Righteous Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BudsOilers Posted January 20, 2020 Report Share Posted January 20, 2020 The two drives that killed the chances had much more to do with play calling than Tannehill's play. Once they were down 11 in the 4th, that's not the Titans game with the matchup of pass rush versus a run blocking OL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.