Jump to content

Rivers to the Titans Rumors


AussieTitanFan08

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, reo said:

This has been his top landing spot after SD for years. Doesn't mean we're interested. Not sure how i'd feel about it. Depends on who we pass on to sign him.

 

Vrabel was raving about him leading up to the SD game basically saying he has better anticipation than any QB he's seen on film. 

Edited by tgo
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Honestly think I'd rather have Tannehill. Rivers is 37 and frankly, hasn't been all that great this year.

Pretty tempting but I think at this point I'd probably rather stick with Tannehill than go with Rivers on one year rental.    Unless they think he has two good years left, then maybe you go

No...I would rather go back to Mariota. Rivers can be a turnover machine at times and we don't have nearly the weapons that the Chargers do either regards to the pass game.

Posted Images

1 minute ago, tgo said:

 

Vrabel was raving about him leading up to the SD game basically saying he has better anticipation than any QB he's seen on film. 

 

He's definitely a very good QB and I do think we bring in a vet if they don't extend Tannehill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, reo said:

 

He's definitely a very good QB and I do think we bring in a vet if they don't extend Tannehill.

 

Yeah, like I said - I think at this point from what I've seen so far I'd prefer Tannehill over Rivers, but I'll take Rivers if not!

 

Another consideration is health - Rivers stays pretty damn healthy. And Tannehill has a major injury history, so Tannehill staying healthy the rest of the year is key. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, tgo said:

 

Yeah, like I said - I think at this point from what I've seen so far I'd prefer Tannehill over Rivers, but I'll take Rivers if not!

 

Another consideration is health - Rivers stays pretty damn healthy. And Tannehill has a major injury history, so Tannehill staying healthy the rest of the year is key. 

 

Tannehill will need to show more for me to pick him over Rivers even though he's played pretty well so far.

 

We'll see...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rivers isn't looking to reboot his career the way Tannehill is; which may play better into the Titan's plans. Sign Rivers for 2 to 3 year deal and draft a qbof and let him sit and develop while River get a shot at a ring with a talented roster. Rivers > Tannehill, especially over a short term. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, No1TitansFan said:

Rivers isn't looking to reboot his career the way Tannehill is; which may play better into the Titan's plans. Sign Rivers for 2 to 3 year deal and draft a qbof and let him sit and develop while River get a shot at a ring with a talented roster. Rivers > Tannehill, especially over a short term. 

this was my thought also

if we are going to go after a QB aggressively in the draft then I'm not sure Rivers wouldn't be a better choice at a bridge type QB for couple years.

if we are just gonna throw a dart at a 3rd or 4th round guy then try and stick with Tannehill since he's good bit younger.

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, No1TitansFan said:

Rivers isn't looking to reboot his career the way Tannehill is; which may play better into the Titan's plans. Sign Rivers for 2 to 3 year deal and draft a qbof and let him sit and develop while River get a shot at a ring with a talented roster. Rivers > Tannehill, especially over a short term. 

 

I'm not so sure on that. Probably true. 

 

But Rivers is not playing well this year and may be entering a steep decline like Brees. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Soxcat said:

Even if the Titans want to bring Tannehill back it isn't a sure thing some other team doesn't offer him a ridiculous deal assuming he really shines the rest of the season.  Tannehill is still fairly young and could go any place and be a franchise guy for years.  Thus, Rivers or anyone else would be in play as we need to look at all our options.  I don't think Rivers is idea considering we would still need to draft someone in the next few years to be the guy when Rivers retires or begins to suck.    


they can tag Tannehill for 1 year if they want to keep him off the market

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...