Jump to content

Who Feels Comfortable with this Offense?


Titansgoodluck

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Titansgoodluck said:


Im pointing out facts.

 

You still pointing out performances against bottom feeding defenses?

Week two thru six the offense scored 55 points.

 

We've scored 50 combined the last two weeks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

We don't utilize Henry on the Edge enough. Too much of this smash-mouth bull that our OLine is incapable of making happen.   Think last years 99 yard run v. Jacksonville and that screen pass

Overall @Titansgoodluck is just a troll trying to argue for Mariota because he's still in his feelings about it. Don't fall for it.

Its an improvement. 

1 hour ago, Titansgoodluck said:


Im pointing out facts.

 

You still pointing out performances against bottom feeding defenses?

But you're pointing out irrelevant facts while ignoring relevant facts. Mariota wasn't playing consistently well against anybody, regardless of where their defense ranked. He just plain wasn't playing well. And btw here's a fact, the Chargers currently have the #6 ranked pass defense and Tannehill dropped 300 yards and 2 TD's on them so your point about bottom-feeding defenses is factually wrong. Stop denying the truth just because you're loyal to Mariota and annoyed by the people who "hate" on him. You don't have to go down with that ship out of spite.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is so simple; you don't have to scrutinize anything. At a glance, the offense looks so much more effective in Tannehill's hands.

 

I think the scheme is still unimaginative. Gronk and Edelman were not great route runners; they just ran to open space.

 

Our guys are too often dragging DBs everywhere with them.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, charleytolar said:

This is so simple; you don't have to scrutinize anything. At a glance, the offense looks so much more effective in Tannehill's hands.

 

I think the scheme is still unimaginative. Gronk and Edelman were not great route runners; they just ran to open space.

 

Our guys are too often dragging DBs everywhere with them.

 


In what ways is it more effective?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Titansgoodluck said:

1. Defense won both games.

 

2. Less skilled rushers and overall worse defenses.

 

3. Less success downfield than early 

1. You mean because they fell on a ball that was snapped into Winston's face-mask while his head was turned?

 

2. Joey Bosa in SD and Jason Paul-Pierre are "less skilled"?  Tampa Bay has the #1 defense against the run.

 

3. Tannehill has yet to benefit from any monster YAC plays from AJ. I'm talking about balls thrown down the field, not a 5 yard slant with 35 yards YAC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...