Puck Posted October 21, 2019 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2019 1 minute ago, Mercalius said: again, this has more to do with QB than the OC. as a matter of fact, this has almost nothing to do with the OC Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercalius Posted October 21, 2019 Report Share Posted October 21, 2019 1 minute ago, PuckDaddy said: again, this has more to do with QB than the OC. as a matter of fact, this has almost nothing to do with the OC It’s a statistic. Or rather, two statistics. They don’t have ulterior motives. What is yours? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
big2033 Posted October 21, 2019 Report Share Posted October 21, 2019 5 minutes ago, PuckDaddy said: again, this has more to do with QB than the OC. as a matter of fact, this has almost nothing to do with the OC It's always more about the QB than the OC. That's the whole point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puck Posted October 21, 2019 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2019 1 minute ago, Mercalius said: It’s a statistic. Or rather, two statistics. They don’t have ulterior motives. What is yours? I'm asking about the OC, not the QB's Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercalius Posted October 21, 2019 Report Share Posted October 21, 2019 Just now, PuckDaddy said: I'm asking about the OC, not the QB's They’re inherently linked though the dependency/beneficiary can be debated. You can’t isolate an OC’s performance or attempt to evaluate him without taking into consideration the QB’s play. It’s one game. You need to pump the brakes on whatever answer you’re looking for. Tannehill needs another month’s worth of starts before we can properly evaluate him and Smith needs another months worth of QB play that isn’t Mariota’s to get a handle on where he is as well. It’s a long season, we’ll get there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted October 21, 2019 Report Share Posted October 21, 2019 12 minutes ago, Mercalius said: I’d wager this Titans team has more talent around him than he had for years in Miami. OILERMAN 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puck Posted October 21, 2019 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2019 1 minute ago, big2033 said: It's always more about the QB than the OC. That's the whole point. perhaps, but that's not the point of this - McNair was probably a better QB with Dinger than he was Steckel. the OC is still relevant Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pat Posted October 21, 2019 Report Share Posted October 21, 2019 Arthur Smith seems fine to me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pat Posted October 21, 2019 Report Share Posted October 21, 2019 Arthur Smith can only call the screen or the bootleg, he can't actually throw the passes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puck Posted October 21, 2019 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2019 1 minute ago, Mercalius said: You can’t isolate an OC’s performance or attempt to evaluate him without taking into consideration the QB’s play. of course you can. you can evaluate a gameplan on being effective whether the offense executes it or not. like running a draw on 3rd and 21 ... shit like that. here's another way of looking at it, what does the QB have to do with a handoff to the RB ? today there were 29 pass attempts and 29 rushes ............ the QB was responsible for half of the offensive results now what? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puck Posted October 21, 2019 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2019 4 minutes ago, patsplat said: Arthur Smith seems fine to me 4 minutes ago, patsplat said: Arthur Smith can only call the screen or the bootleg, he can't actually throw the passes. Thanks man, been looking for this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercalius Posted October 21, 2019 Report Share Posted October 21, 2019 3 minutes ago, PuckDaddy said: of course you can. you can evaluate a gameplan on being effective whether the offense executes it or not. like running a draw on 3rd and 21 ... shit like that. here's another way of looking at it, what does the QB have to do with a handoff to the RB ? today there were 29 pass attempts and 29 rushes ............ the QB was responsible for half of the offensive results now what? Do you even know what you’re attempting to argue at this point? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puck Posted October 21, 2019 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2019 10 minutes ago, Mercalius said: You need to pump the brakes on whatever answer you’re looking for. the question(s) were clearly laid out in the OP. "pump the brakes" , "ulterior motives" - c'mon man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercalius Posted October 21, 2019 Report Share Posted October 21, 2019 1 minute ago, PuckDaddy said: the question(s) were clearly laid out in the OP. "pump the brakes" , "ulterior motives" - c'mon man As it’s been stated by dozens of people already, including me in this thread several times, it’s one game. We looked better today. Arguably good. But it’s a single game. In which the most pivotal role was different than the previous six games. Give it time to form a conclusive opinion. If you want more than that....good luck? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puck Posted October 21, 2019 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2019 1 minute ago, Mercalius said: Do you even know what you’re attempting to argue at this point? I'm not "attempting to argue" anything I asked a question, several actually. I asked about Arthur Smith, you've replied with Spots, Refs, Defenses and QB stats. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.