tgo

Impeachment Inquiry Underway

Recommended Posts

Waiting.....

12 minutes ago, tgo said:

 

What are they waiting for?

 

Remember when ppl thought Mueller had so much that they were just piecing it all together so they could really nail his balls to the wall?

 

I honestly think the Dems/Pelosi are this stupid....

 

They thought the election was this year, this November, and was hoping their pretend impeachment, aka scare tactic, would sway enough voters. 

 

Poor fools. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/clinton-email-critics-do-a-role-reversal-as-trump-administration-draws-fire-for-private-phone-use/2019/10/09/4e9fa357-2964-417f-a128-d543b8ac28b4_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_devices-415pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans
 

More than four years after a squad of House Republicans led a charge against then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for her handling of sensitive diplomatic information, the State Department is once again under scrutiny for how diplomats use personal phones to conduct official business.

 

But some of those same House lawmakers are now on the opposite side of the controversy, playing defense for U.S. diplomats.

On Tuesday, lawmakers said that President Trump’s top envoys for Ukraine and the European Union used personal phones and an encrypted messenger app as they conducted U.S. policy on Ukraine, a matter that was revealed during House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.

 

The most vocal defenders of the Trump administration’s actions include some of the most aggressive critics of Clinton’s handling of sensitive information, including Rep. Jim Jordan (R) of Ohio, Rep. Mark Meadows (R) of North Carolina and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who as a Kansas congressman had attacked Clinton by underscoring the solemn role of soldiers in defending U.S. secrets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, tgo said:
Matt Drudge turning on Trump.

 

Drudge, Tucker Carlson, Shep Smith, Chris Wallace.

 

Whose next? 

When the drudge report turns its back, there goes a YUGE percentage of his retarded base.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Starkiller said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/clinton-email-critics-do-a-role-reversal-as-trump-administration-draws-fire-for-private-phone-use/2019/10/09/4e9fa357-2964-417f-a128-d543b8ac28b4_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_devices-415pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans
 

More than four years after a squad of House Republicans led a charge against then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for her handling of sensitive diplomatic information, the State Department is once again under scrutiny for how diplomats use personal phones to conduct official business.

 

But some of those same House lawmakers are now on the opposite side of the controversy, playing defense for U.S. diplomats.

On Tuesday, lawmakers said that President Trump’s top envoys for Ukraine and the European Union used personal phones and an encrypted messenger app as they conducted U.S. policy on Ukraine, a matter that was revealed during House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.

 

The most vocal defenders of the Trump administration’s actions include some of the most aggressive critics of Clinton’s handling of sensitive information, including Rep. Jim Jordan (R) of Ohio, Rep. Mark Meadows (R) of North Carolina and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who as a Kansas congressman had attacked Clinton by underscoring the solemn role of soldiers in defending U.S. secrets.

 

Isn't this apples to oranges?

 

What classified info had been leaked or put at risk?

 

Who was ambushed and killed as a result?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, JakePA_Titan said:

Waiting.....

What are they waiting for?

 

Remember when ppl thought Mueller had so much that they were just piecing it all together so they could really nail his balls to the wall?

 

I honestly think the Dems/Pelosi are this stupid....

 

They thought the election was this year, this November, and was hoping their pretend impeachment, aka scare tactic, would sway enough voters. 

 

Poor fools. 

 

They’re waiting for public opinion to move (it has) and are putting together the case for obstruction. The evidence is already there otherwise, it’s all already been leaked to the press - whistleblower complaint, corroborating transcript, text messages, etc.

 

He will be impeached in the coming weeks, don’t kid yourself - they already have the votes. Obviously they wouldn’t have taken this route with no definite end game. 

 

Impeaching him is now the most popular option. Not impeaching is now the politically dangerous and unpopular position.  

Edited by tgo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, JakePA_Titan said:

 

Isn't this apples to oranges?

 

What classified info had been leaked or put at risk?


We won’t know until the House investigates all of their personal devices, will we?

 

 

21 minutes ago, JakePA_Titan said:

Who was ambushed and killed as a result?


The Kurds? Ukrainian soldiers fighting Russian troops?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, tgo said:

 

They’re waiting for public opinion to move (it has) and are putting together the case for obstruction. The evidence is already there otherwise, it’s all already been leaked to the press - whistleblower complaint, corroborating transcript, text messages, etc.

 

He will be impeached in the coming weeks, don’t kid yourself - they already have the votes. Obviously they wouldn’t have taken this route with no definite end game. 

 

Impeaching him is now the most popular option. Not impeaching is now the politically dangerous and unpopular position.  

Supposedly impeaching him has been very popular since he's been elected. Don't kid yourself. 

 

He was considered impeachable with wanting a wall and his travel ban....

 

And weeks? So definitely before December?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Starkiller said:


We won’t know until the House investigates all of their personal devices, will we?

 

Maybe they should Hillary Clinton, or should I say, Tom Brady those mfers....

 

Obviously there is nothing wrong with it....what's the worst that came between the two situations? Million dollars and a draft pick? No sweat. 

23 minutes ago, Starkiller said:

 


The Kurds? Ukrainian soldiers fighting Russian troops?

 

Yea, no need to wait on anything to realize the comparison to Niger is lacking. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Starkiller said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/clinton-email-critics-do-a-role-reversal-as-trump-administration-draws-fire-for-private-phone-use/2019/10/09/4e9fa357-2964-417f-a128-d543b8ac28b4_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_devices-415pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans
 

More than four years after a squad of House Republicans led a charge against then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for her handling of sensitive diplomatic information, the State Department is once again under scrutiny for how diplomats use personal phones to conduct official business.

 

But some of those same House lawmakers are now on the opposite side of the controversy, playing defense for U.S. diplomats.

On Tuesday, lawmakers said that President Trump’s top envoys for Ukraine and the European Union used personal phones and an encrypted messenger app as they conducted U.S. policy on Ukraine, a matter that was revealed during House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.

 

The most vocal defenders of the Trump administration’s actions include some of the most aggressive critics of Clinton’s handling of sensitive information, including Rep. Jim Jordan (R) of Ohio, Rep. Mark Meadows (R) of North Carolina and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who as a Kansas congressman had attacked Clinton by underscoring the solemn role of soldiers in defending U.S. secrets.

 

So an unsecure server is the same as an encrypted communication app? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jmalon said:

 

So an unsecure server is the same as an encrypted communication app? 


A personal device is the same as a personal server.
 

The fact that the Trump admin is attempting to hide their government communications should be concerning, even if it wasn’t against the law. Are you suggesting now that State Dept officials should not have to archive their electronic communications? If so then Hillary would be happy to hear your opinion on her email...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Starkiller said:


A personal device is the same as a personal server.
 

The fact that the Trump admin is attempting to hide their government communications should be concerning, even if it wasn’t against the law. Are you suggesting now that State Dept officials should not have to archive their electronic communications? If so then Hillary would be happy to hear your opinion on her email...

This really isn’t a fight you should have. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   1 member