Jump to content

Impeachment Inquiry Underway


tgo

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Rolltide said:

 

Clinton's people never investigated her. They were obsessed with Trump. 

 

If you think these people are honest and not crooked I have some oceanfront property in Colorado to sell you.  The bitch even lies about hot sauce. 

 

You still haven't answered the questions.

 

1.  Why did you say she wasn't under oath, when she obviously was?

 

2.  Why didn't Sessions or Barr prosecute her for perjury?

 

waiting......

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Why isn't more being made of Trump trying to cover his tracks with his after-the-fact phone call in which he says "I WANT NO QUID PRO QUO" -- a phrase he only learned after the whistle blower came for

I feel so much better knowing the man who paid 140k to a porn star before the 2016 election to buy her silence, is looking into possible corruption of another candidate. 

The current Republicans in Congress are straight cowards.  

Posted Images

7 minutes ago, chef said:

 

 

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/dec/05/donald-trump/donald-trump-falsely-claims-hillary-clinton-lied-f/

 

I am more impressed that the Clintons - hated, utterly villified, literally demonized - by so, so many, have somehow managed to just murder everyone in their path, and apparently rape babies and drink their blood (a Q-loving associate of mine informed me of this, apparently happens in a secret castle with the Rothschilds or some such...deep state....ILLUMINATI!!!).  Etc, et al on their highway to hell.

 

Yet a massive Ken Starr-led team spent 6 years and $70 mil (non-adjusted dollars) and was able to prove he fooled around with an intern.  And yes as very expected, was pretty much a sleazy womanizer that surely had done similar in his past.  But they were looking for anything, EVERYTHING.  And somehow all the murders and baby rape just never came up, and still don't via our American justice system (DEEP STATE!!!). Just amazes me people believe that our system of government that on one hand they say is so inept, can function so well as to effectively and willingly cover all this up such that they never receive punishment for these horrid crimes.  Frankly, it's damn near the same boat of people who think W & Co. blew up the Twin Towers as a way to go kill Hussein for his daddy and take their oil (now after the fact, after it occurred and they got to survey the landscape.... well, different story).  Figured there'd be a Linda Tripp or three coming forward by now.

 

I have zero reservations agreeing with someone who says there is a lot going on we have no clue about, that Clinton, Bush damn near all of them do some sketchy things - as it almost required to get into the White House, and then to run it.  But the idea that the FBI is both so stupid and crooked such that they let the types of things these folks are accused of simply slip by with no issue is such a massive leap of faith to keep your conspiracy alive.  It is a fascinating psychological profile, that utter NEED to believe in such things when common sense says otherwise to most.  A compulsion to believe often such that you feel special in knowing what's "real" when the rest of us sheep just don't.  A need to feel superior, that you Get It, and the rest of us are simply idiots. 

 

As indicated but to be clear, this is not limited to one party, or even politics.  But the nature of the information age has blown up this persona to disturbing heights, and not really sure yet how we get that Pandora's Box closed - the free-sharing of information combined with the ability to share and then believe baseless claims over and over until they become incontestable truths for such a massive % of the population.   And not like Silicon Valley has shown much interest in putting dents on ad rev such that they can assist.  

 

Hard for me to escape this bigger socio-psychological picture when discussions like this happen. Trump has come and will go one way or another, but this is likely to stay and have much greater negative impact than anything he does (for those viewing him in the negative - which is the majority by a little considering a 41% approval rating right about now).

 

Yup.  Sometimes a little common sense goes a long way.

 

Why didn't Session or Barr prosecute Hillary?

 

If it's a witch hunt according to Trump, why stop the people who could exonerate him from testifying?

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rolltide said:

 

The Bengazi lies were not under oath. When questioned under oath she did not directly lie about it. She slimed around it by saying there were demonstrations in Cairo. watch the video. 

 

Dumb shit there was no civil disturbance in Bengazi! She knew it was a planned attack and lied in the media. 

 

Breitbart disagrees with you as shown up thread.  She testified for 11 hours under oath.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rolltide said:

How many more murders would the Clintons be responsible for of that skanky bitch was president? They just killed Epstein. Vince Foster probably 13-15 others. How many more? 

 

 

LOL..... Show us what you've got that they killed Epstein.   Then explain why they haven't been arrested for killing him and 13-15 others.

 

How have they gotten away with so many murders?  lol

Edited by ctm
Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ctm said:

 

Yup.  Sometimes a little common sense goes a long way.

 

Why didn't Session or Barr prosecute Hillary?

 

If it's a witch hunt according to Trump, why stop the people who could exonerate him from testifying?

Sessions was a horrible pick simply because he was a politician. He would not ruffle feathers because, as shown the othe day, he wanted to stay in politics and didnt want to make enemies.

Barr. Well his tenure is not over with so let's wait to see. Nobody in the public knows what investigations he has going, except a few.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, LongTimeFan said:

Sessions was a horrible pick simply because he was a politician. He would not ruffle feathers because, as shown the othe day, he wanted to stay in politics and didnt want to make enemies.

Barr. Well his tenure is not over with so let's wait to see. Nobody in the public knows what investigations he has going, except a few.

 

It's been almost 3 years since Trump took office.  Trump begged Sessions to do something.  If there was something there, we'd know about it by now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ctm said:

 

Hillary killing Epstein and 13-15 others isn't just a stupid rant.  It's lunatic fringe conspiracy stuff that only the truly delusional believe.

Oh trust me I know. It's just sad watching him foam at the mouth calling her every name he can think of. He can't go 1 post talking about her without mentioning her genitals or calling her a skank or some other stupid comment.

 

Most of us couldn't care less about her but if you speak out against Trump you somehow love her.

Link to post
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, ctm said:

 

It's been almost 3 years since Trump took office.  Trump begged Sessions to do something.  If there was something there, we'd know about it by now.

That's probably true, I am just saying Barr's tenure is not over and he does not give a crap about a political future. 

 

Also, after Barr's comments the other day about the 'resistence', I think he may have some shit he is going to throw down. Just my opinion from his tone.

Edited by LongTimeFan
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ctm said:

 

Yup.  Sometimes a little common sense goes a long way.

 

Why didn't Session or Barr prosecute Hillary?

 

If it's a witch hunt according to Trump, why stop the people who could exonerate him from testifying?

 

And I won't engage to waste my time, but we're talking about a number of long term gov't officials who HAVE come forward about Trump in a way they did not (meaning in the sheer volume and public declarations) against Clinton/Bush/Obama.  Not to mention plain in sight actions. Also, I'm pretty sure if Trump had legit dirt to Lock Her Up he would have pushed it Day One.  And murders, pedo-crap and so on would obviously be over the top dirt.  The underlying conspiracy group holds onto this belief that... just wait for it, it's coming, 13 dimensional chess master, barge is sitting right outside and taking Obama and Hillary to Guantanamo, all actions calculated to trap this massive pedophilia ring that meets in the pizza parlor ordering walnut sauce or some such (boy Epstein did a number to push that one right up to the top).

 

My core feelings on conspiracies are that there are likely some mind-blowing ones sitting in someone's closet here and there, many lost to time.  But that the ones anonymous sources throw against the wall like so much spaghetti are generally the most likely to be complete and utter crap, the land of pointy hats.  Done so for the same reason you drop a worm on a hook - you know fish will bite and then you have them on the hook.

Link to post
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Rolltide said:

 

I cannot prove it you retard. I think they did perhaps in cahoots with the royal family. 

 

Somebody killed him and then you look at motive. Bill Clinton spent a lot of time on pedo island and his legacy could have been destroyed by Epstein's testimony. 

 

It is rather amazing the number of people who could have potentially provided damaging testimony against the Clintons who ended up murdered.  


It’s hilarious the hoops and contortions you go through to believe conspiracy theories on the Clintons.  Yet, you conveniently ignore sworn testimony by career civil servants about the orange POS you worship. Too funny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ctm said:

 

This google search took less than 1 minute, note the source is Breitbart:

 

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testified under oath before the House Select Committee on Benghazi last October that she had turned over “all my work related emails” from her private email server to the State Department.

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2016/07/05/hillary-clinton-committed-perjury-benghazi-committee/

 

So you either you don't know wtf your are talking about or deliberately lying.  It has to be one or the other.

 

So, I ask again.....why didn't Sessions or Barr prosecute her if she lied under oath?

 

I'm glad you try to explain this shit to the dumbass.  It won't matter, he'll just call you a racist for some completely unhinged reason and move on, but hey, you tried.  I gave up some time ago.  I just point out that he's a 5'2 angry bastard, laugh and go on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...