reo Posted November 16, 2019 Report Share Posted November 16, 2019 Just now, Rolltide said: The witness today was asked of she knew of any illegal activity by Trump. She said no. In public, under oath and without coaching and spin from the fake media she had no choice. She's an ambassador, not a legal expert. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted November 16, 2019 Report Share Posted November 16, 2019 Just now, Rolltide said: None of that was proven you idiot. Not even close. Trump has a right to speak and have an opinion. He has a right to claim his innocence. Witness tampering what an idiot! He doesn't have a right to intimidate a witness. The rest is in the process of being proven, thus the public hearings and testimonies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted November 16, 2019 Report Share Posted November 16, 2019 Just now, Rolltide said: She was one of 3 choice witnesses for your side. And it's just the beginning. Just now, Rolltide said: As for Biden you call what Trump did bribery? You brain stem. Is Trump on video bragging how he coerced the president to the Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden? What fucked up logic is that? Trump got nothing! Stop parroting the Castro brother or Sleezewall. More false equivalency as per usual. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted November 16, 2019 Report Share Posted November 16, 2019 Just now, JakePA_Titan said: Considering how many legal experts are on this board, I can't imagine she's any dumber than any of yall.... Oh here comes the "smart" one to help out lol MadMax, and Mythos27 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted November 16, 2019 Report Share Posted November 16, 2019 Just now, Rolltide said: He did not. Sticking your head back in the sand, I see. Just now, Rolltide said: she would not have known about the tweet had your hero Adam Shitt read it to her. Irrelevant. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted November 16, 2019 Report Share Posted November 16, 2019 1 minute ago, JakePA_Titan said: Yovanovitch certainly didn't help out....not yall anyway... Yeah, ok lol Just now, Rolltide said: Impeach Trump in the house so the senate can can subpoena Shitt, Pelosi, Hunter and other assorted scum. John Roberts would preside over the senate trial so Trump will actually have constitutional rights. the 6th amendment will not just get shit canned. Lol ok Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted November 16, 2019 Report Share Posted November 16, 2019 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Rolltide said: Shitt was an accessory. If she was intimidated by the tweet then Shitt participated in that. . Trump has the first amendment right to speak his opinion. He can call those who accuse him or speak out against him liars. He has a right to voice his innocence. I know you tards consider a man defending himself as obstruction. You hate the constitution and are wiling to destroy it to get Trump. 1st ammendment has its limits. He does not have the right to intimidate witnesses. Schiff telling her is irrelevant. Edited November 16, 2019 by reo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted November 16, 2019 Report Share Posted November 16, 2019 3 minutes ago, Rolltide said: He said nothing intimidating. That is dumber than shit. MadMax 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted November 16, 2019 Report Share Posted November 16, 2019 4 minutes ago, Rolltide said: What was Adam Schitt's crime when he repeatedly interrupted the congresswoman from New York Elise Stefanik? Intimidation? Assault? Abuse of power? https://www.google.com/amp/s/slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/11/impeachment-hearing-stefanik-nunes-stunt.amp Not that you'll read it... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted November 16, 2019 Report Share Posted November 16, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, JakePA_Titan said: What part of what he quoted is considered to be intimidating? I heard him say "he threatened you", but how exactly? What was said? Oh so it has to be a direct threat then? She even said it was intimidating. Thanks for jumping in to try and move the goalposts though. Edited November 16, 2019 by reo MadMax 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted November 16, 2019 Report Share Posted November 16, 2019 1 minute ago, JakePA_Titan said: I'm honestly not sure what an indirect threat is....can you explain that to me? I'm simply asking you, what part was a threat. Can you provide a clear answer or not? So intimidating has to be a direct threat? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted November 16, 2019 Report Share Posted November 16, 2019 3 minutes ago, JakePA_Titan said: You keep dodging the question. I can only assume you have no answer. As stated in another thread, I have no interest in posting quotes just for you to dismiss the obvious and dismiss them. its boring. We both know the tweets. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted November 16, 2019 Report Share Posted November 16, 2019 1 minute ago, JakePA_Titan said: Nope, you just continue to say the same shit. He did it, I wont tell you how, but just believe me.... That's what yall been doing for 3 years. When has it worked? It's true, yall dont care about facts and evidence. Speculation is what yall pin your hopes on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Btowner Posted November 16, 2019 Report Share Posted November 16, 2019 10 hours ago, Rolltide said: Congress woman Elise Stefanik in a matter of a minute proves how Adam Shitt lied about 15 times about the Whistle blower testifying. As usual, you’re falling for BS. In your video clip, someone is breaking the agreed inquiry rules. Hint it’s not Schiff. I know you don’t care for the truth, but here goes. You can add it to the list of things you read that you don’t understand. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/11/15/20967080/impeachment-hearing-yovanovitch-stefanik-schiff-trump Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Btowner Posted November 16, 2019 Report Share Posted November 16, 2019 Stefanik intentionally misleading Trump supporters. reo 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.