code

Mariota is exceptional and he must be extended

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, big2033 said:

 

With Mett on the team I'd take him again lol.

 

At least we won some games.

We, not him. 

 

And just like last time, you'd be wrong.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Mettamucil said:

We, not him. 

 

And just like last time, you'd be wrong.  

 

We definitely didn't go 0-10. 

 

I was 100% right. Mariota was better than Mett and Mett was absolute dogshit. The best thing he did in his NFL career was hookup with Whiz's daughter.

 

And Whiz's daughter is as close as his dick will get to the NFL again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, big2033 said:

 

We definitely didn't go 0-10. 

 

I was 100% right. Mariota was better than Mett and Mett was absolute dogshit. The best thing he did in his NFL career was hookup with Whiz's daughter.

 

And Whiz's daughter is as close as his dick will get to the NFL again.

Uh huh.  

 

You'll never even be able to see you were wrong.   Only one who argued for Mariota to begin with could be that dense. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Mettamucil said:

Uh huh.  

 

You'll never even be able to see you were wrong.   Only one who argued for Mariota to begin with could be that dense. 

 

Wrong about what? 

 

Please tell me what I was wrong about? Spell it out so everyone can see how dumb you are lol.

Edited by big2033

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, big2033 said:

 

Wrong about what? 

 

Please tell me what I was wrong about? Spell it out so everyone can see how dumb you are lol.

Your team drafted a project at #2 overall in 2015.  No one wanted the project more than you. 

 

 

Any other course of action puts you ahead of where you argued they had to go.  Period. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Mettamucil said:

Your team drafted a project at #2 overall in 2015.  No one wanted the project more than you. 

 

 

Any other course of action puts you ahead of where you argued they had to go.  Period. 

 

 

With how bad our QB situation was I thought drafting Mariota was worth the risk. And considering how our offense improved it 100% was.

 

I would do it again.

 

Because with Mett we definitely weren't going to win any games. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, big2033 said:

 

With how bad our QB situation was I thought drafting Mariota was worth the risk. And considering how our offense improved it 100% was.

 

I would do it again.

 

Because with Mett we definitely weren't going to win any games. 

And you were wrong. One, the situation wasn't bad.  Two, better QB's awaited following years.  

 

 

You and the Titans were both wrong. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Mettamucil said:

And you were wrong. One, the situation wasn't bad.  Two, better QB's awaited following years.  

 

 

You and the Titans were both wrong. 

 

Unless you can alter time there was no guarantee we'd have the picks the following years. Especially considering how great Mett was going to be instead of Mariota right?

 

So you make the best decision with the info in front of you. 

 

Now was Mariota evaluated bad? Absolutely. But if the Titans eval said he was worth the pick, the pick had to be made at the time. Which is 100% what I argued for.

 

You don't ignore your eval because you MIGHT have another QB better ranked next year.

Edited by big2033

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.