Soxcat

Mathematical Challenges to Darwin’s Theory of Evolution

Recommended Posts

On 8/12/2019 at 10:30 PM, Little Earl said:

Stop embarrassing yourself trying to explain away God.   You fall way short every time.  Takes more faith to believe in evolution and whatever lame theory they come up with to explain the creation of the universe, then to believe in God.   Lol at the multiverse theory!

why in the ever living fuck??? ...

why do you believe evolution = no God?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, titanruss said:

why in the ever living fuck??? ...

why do you believe evolution = no God?

 

Oldschool does not believe in God, so it was addressed to him.   Evolution when including their explanations for the origins of life tries to say no God.   But yes, it is possible that God used the processed of evolution, or designed it so evidence pointed to it, but it was all done instantaneously.      

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Little Earl said:

1. Evolution when including their explanations for the origins of life tries to say no God.   2. But yes, it is possible that God used the processed of evolution, or designed it so evidence pointed to it, but it was all done instantaneously.      

1. No it really doesn’t 

2. Why does it have to be done spontaneously? You seem to be limiting Gods abilities. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Little Earl said:

But yes, it is possible that God used the processed of evolution, or designed it so evidence pointed to it, but it was all done instantaneously.      

It wasn’t, as we know scientifically...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Starkiller said:

It wasn’t, as we know scientifically...

You clearly don't know shit.   God could have created the stars with a light stream already there for our viewing.  Science can not disprove that.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Little Earl said:

You clearly don't know shit.   God could have created the stars with a light stream already there for our viewing.  Science can not disprove that.   

Only if your god is The Prince of Lies, intentionally deceiving humanity...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is amazing is how much you get all bent out of shape over something you think is meaningless.  Not to mention the fact you strongly believe in things we do not know yet.  So you assume what is the truth and real based on theory's decades old and fight like hell for them. 

 

Now in reality your god is the prince of lies, the god of this world and the great deceiver and anti-christ.  And he is the reason you and your ilk all walk in lock step.  You hide under the cover of science and yet I posted a scientific discussion which includes two of the three scientists that don't necessarily believe in the creation theory but at the same time are smart enough to not discount anything they clearly have yet to have all the information about. 

 

Watch the video and have an open mind for once.  By the way they all agree that there is "intelligent" design in there which they can't explain that Darwin's theory can't explain.  In fact it takes more faith to believe that as the "origin of species".  While there is evidence of natural selection in nature it certainly does not explain, and fill in the gaps.  So you can be intellectual and want to know more about that or you can be a peanut head and argue with someone who has strong beliefs in God.  I'll stand on my science AND my faith over your weak puny non-objective baloney any day of the week.  Go Bernie!  Later comrade.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, oldschool said:

Science deniers gonna deny. Embarassing…

That's mighty ignorant of you oldschool.   Btw, creation science is real, but since you don't want to believe in it, you are a denier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Soxcat said:

Now in reality your god is the prince of lies, the god of this world and the great deceiver and anti-christ.

Not my world. Earl admitted that was his god...

 

 

2 hours ago, Soxcat said:

Watch the video and have an open mind for once.  By the way they all agree that there is "intelligent" design in there which they can't explain that Darwin's theory can't explain.  

Of course they are all anti-Darwin and pro-creationism. That’s why you posted it in the first place. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No actually my focus has been on the extreme probabilities that would have to be overcome for all this to happen by chance.   How DNA magically appeared, the complexity of a single living cell let alone an organism with multiple complex functioning (eye, ear, heart and circulatory, lungs, immune systems, and so on) that apparently just "evolved".  Then ~10 million separate species that have lived on earth including plants and animals that function completely differently than each other (how they harness energy, reproduce, waste elimination). 

 

Also, scientists get giddy when they find one of the "missing link" fossils.  Only problem is if these transitions occurred over millions and millions of years, and those transitions occurred in steps, wouldn't there be millions and millions of years worth of fossil record?  Hey, we found a reptile with bird like characteristics.  That settles it?  But wait, where are his ancestors?  Or the million of years of his off spring?  Or maybe the best question to ask is how the hell did the reptile decide to become a flipping bird to begin with?  Those are dam smart reptiles.  Or damn smart intelligent design?

 

You see it takes just a little common sense to ask these questions.  Darwinism has become a religion it is assumed he was right and everything else is based on that assumption.  Every fossil found is looked at with the purpose of proving Darwin right.  Cells decided, on their own to come together and make multi-cell organisms.  Within those primitive life forms they somehow, on their own, by chance, decided they need everything from digestive systems, circulatory systems and such and some were even smart enough they decided to grown legs and lungs so they could leave the water.  Others, by chance, decided to become plants.  They decided it would be easier to harness energy from the sun and CO2.  It was an easier life but they don't get to move around much.  Damn nature is smart.  Intelligent.  

 

Edited by Soxcat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing magically appeared. The earliest forms of life began billions of years ago and it took billions of years to go from simple life to animals like we have today. 

 

We have proof that organic materials exist naturally even on asteroids. We have verified lab experiments, designed to replicate expected primordial conditions, that prove that the basic building blocks of life can form from those organic materials.

 

A new study shows how the first organic cells could form on their own. 

https://m.phys.org/news/2019-08-cells-emerged-blocks-proteins-stabilized.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Little Earl said:

That's mighty ignorant of you oldschool.   Btw, creation science is real, but since you don't want to believe in it, you are a denier.

No creation science isnt real you moron. It's okay to believe in some version of God but it not okay perpetuate fake theories to suit your religious beliefs. Evolution is real, the universe is approx 13 billion years old, the earth is approx 4 billion years old, and eve wasnt born of Adam's rib. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, oldschool said:

No creation science isnt real you moron. It's okay to believe in some version of God but it not okay perpetuate fake theories to suit your religious beliefs. Evolution is real, the universe is approx 13 billion years old, the earth is approx 4 billion years old, and eve wasnt born of Adam's rib. 

Nothing you wrote is true.   They have no idea the real age of the universe or earth.  They make assumptions in their estimates that could very well be completely wrong.   Adam was the first man and Eve was the first woman.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've noticed a trend that every single observation made by these creation 'scientists' seems to confirm their interpretation of things written in their own religious texts.

 

They're batting 1000! They must be super great at their jobs. How is it that creationists, flat earthers and bigfootologists keep snatching up all the best scientists?

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.