Jump to content

Recommended Posts

8MM   
27 minutes ago, CreepingDeath said:

Someone help me here, please.  I didn't watch the game nor have seen any highlights.  Was what Tannehill did on Thursday really THAT impressive?  I mean, beyond the resident agenda-hammers here, what's with the hype?

 

It's preseason.  Game one.  Did the Eagles even play starters?  

 

I'm serious, what did I miss?  My instinct is to think all of you are drowning in overreaction and the constant drumming of "the agenda."

As a MM supporter, even I can easily see that RT looked much better.  It wouldn't have been as bad if MM drove them to a TD.  Everything RT did was much better, even if it weren't the starters.  If the Titans want the best chance of winning, then they should go to Tannehill. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OILERMAN   
10 minutes ago, 8MM said:

As a MM supporter, even I can easily see that RT looked much better.  It wouldn't have been as bad if MM drove them to a TD.  Everything RT did was much better, even if it weren't the starters.  If the Titans want the best chance of winning, then they should go to Tannehill. 

 My hats off to you man, you admit what some of the homers/retards can’t or won’t admit.

 

btw, I told you so

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, 8MM said:

As a MM supporter, even I can easily see that RT looked much better.  It wouldn't have been as bad if MM drove them to a TD.  Everything RT did was much better, even if it weren't the starters.  If the Titans want the best chance of winning, then they should go to Tannehill. 

Perhaps this will be extra motivation for Mariota to do whatever it was that lead to his success in the past.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, CreepingDeath said:

Thanks for the replies.

I still am not convinced as it is the preseason (no real defensive schemes, non-starters, etc).  Add in that Tannehill was dumped after a long stint in Miami doesn't spell "world-beater" to me.  If Mariota flounders when it matters (regular season), then sure - put in the backup.

It has nothing to do with preseason or the talent hes up against, theres no talent in his arm. 

Edited by headhunter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it weren't for Humphries Mariota might not have completed a pass. Even then some were horrid. Mariota looked like a rookie trying to make the team. RT was poised, worked the pocket (nice little side step to get room to throw and complete a pass), looked right for his primary and saw he was covered, looked left for an alternate, one more quick glance right then back to the left for a completion. No stare downs. Saw he had Firsker with a LB with his back turned and dropped it in right over his head for a TD.  It's early, but this is getting very interesting.

Edited by JoelinBellevue

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Number9   
5 hours ago, Denali said:

OK, I know.  Some of you think this isn't even a controversy at this point, but I'll ask anyway.

 

Who wins the training camp battle for backup QB? Woodside or Mariota?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BudAdams   
9 minutes ago, CreepingDeath said:

Perhaps this will be extra motivation for Mariota to do whatever it was that lead to his success in the past.  

Do we get to play Arkansas State, Nicholls State, South Dakota, and Wyoming?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TitanTez   
1 hour ago, 8MM said:

As a MM supporter, even I can easily see that RT looked much better.  It wouldn't have been as bad if MM drove them to a TD.  Everything RT did was much better, even if it weren't the starters.  If the Titans want the best chance of winning, then they should go to Tannehill. 

Real Talk here,I really believe MM does not like to be coached.

After he is gone, it will come out that he is one hard headed SOB.

It is not possible to still be making these mechanical and game mistakes and be coachable.

Edited by TitanTez

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ap24786 said:

Yes and it's year 8 for Tannehill and his team dumped him. Like if you're going to over exaggerate things at least be consistent.

And yet we still hold on to Mariota

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ap24786   

The QB controversy hysteria is comical. Look, I think Tannehill is a good QB. I think he could still start for 5-8 teams. That being said, this notion that there should be a QB controversy let alone Tannehill should start is simply due to volume of plays for each player. 

 

In four drives last night, his last drive was very good. Two went 3 and out, and one was completely driven by the run game which produced like 75 yards before Tannehill threw a one yard TD pass.  He looked calm in the pocket sure, but the OL was dominating the game and gave him a lot of time. People are overreacting to one game because they think Mariota couldn't do the same if he had great OL play and was going against backups. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...