big2033 Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 1 hour ago, OILERMAN said: I think the idea they wanted to give Tanny 1st team reps without Mariota alternating makes sense. Is it a sign of something? Sure, it's a sign that the Titans need their back-up QB more reps with the 1st team than a team with an established long term QB would need. Does it mean more, who knows, it's possible. It's more than possible they decide Tanny gives them a better chance to win at some point. They have no obligation to MM and they are trying to win. In the end, through all the smoke and mirrors, people should feel confident that coaches will play the best player. And if MM's chances are as thin as missing a practice to his backup ... lol ... he wasn't going to last long anyway. So if they really believe this was nothing ... they shouldn't worry. And if they believe this is something ... they shouldn't worry ... right? OILERMAN 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post MIKE75 Posted August 7, 2019 Popular Post Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 17 hours ago, TeamRamrod27 said: When EXACTLY did the quality of posts and threads in this forum fall off a fucking cliff? Was it when Jonboy stopped being as active? My eyes glaze over just about everything except for Aussie and a very select few others’ posts. I’m not excusing myself from the low quality either. I fully acknowledge that I don’t make threads ever or post as often these days, but it’s so damn disinteresting around here, it’s hard to want to. The level of trolling is even abysmal now. Maybe it’s all on me and it was always this way. There are some really smart posters on this site that have a lot of knowledge. Then there are the trolls,idiots and most of all naysayers who sit on here all day waiting on posters so they can disagree or throw some dissenting comment out there and a couple of knuckleheads agree and that gives them the validation/attention they so desperately crave. Hey i'm not perfect i do contribute but not every post/thread is five star quality. Some of us just want to come here and chill and catch up on the team not have a war of words. Posters following other posters around just to antagonize them. Agree the level of trolling has gotten bad. Best weapon you have is to ignore and once they aren't getting the response they desire they'll quit. JMoney420, EagleEye, TeamRamrod, and 3 others 1 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MIKE75 Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 17 hours ago, Mythos27 said: I honestly can't even tell what's trolling and what's real anymore... LOL, The lines between the two are blurred beyond recognition. Justafan, and Mythos27 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanruss Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 7 hours ago, BudAdams said: Maybe I need to try on the pc.. all I’m getting is pixel words Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanruss Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 Didnt these yards try to push this same conversation with Matt Casserl and Blaine gabbert? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 24 minutes ago, titanruss said: Didnt these yards try to push this same conversation with Matt Casserl and Blaine gabbert? If Mularkey ruined MM why are you even worried about it. You should be wanting Tannehill to start over some ruined QB. Either he's a good QB or ruined, you're arguing both. headhunter 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanruss Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 1 hour ago, OILERMAN said: If Mularkey ruined MM why are you even worried about it. You should be wanting Tannehill to start over some ruined QB. Either he's a good QB or ruined, you're arguing both. He ruined his growth path. Didn’t ruin the player just set his development back. Its not not that difficult to understand. ...and tannehill is either better or he’s not.. he’s not even good enough to be ranked by your 55 GMs.. yet you think he’s better. You can’t have both, right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nine Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 2 hours ago, titanruss said: Didnt these yards try to push this same conversation with Matt Casserl and Blaine gabbert? Nope. Because everyone knew Cassell and Gabbert were replacement-level journeyman types who had no business starting. (Well, everyone except Joel, who automatically assumes every QB who isn’t Mariota is better than Mariota.) Tannehill is a far better QB than either of those guys...and based on Mariota’s last two years, the argument can made that Tannehill is better than him, too. OILERMAN 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 5 minutes ago, titanruss said: He ruined his growth path. Didn’t ruin the player just set his development back. Its not not that difficult to understand. ...and tannehill is either better or he’s not.. he’s not even good enough to be ranked by your 55 GMs.. yet you think he’s better. You can’t have both, right? Point one, you specifically said earlier in the thread "Mularkey ruined him". Either he's ruined or he's not. Point two which is laughably simple and so stupid for you to mention. Tannehill wasn't ranked because Sando's article specifically said it was a ranking of "STARTING" NFL QBs. Tannehill is a back-up so he wasn't ranked. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
japan Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 (edited) 10 hours ago, Titans279 said: No one was saying he lost his job mate! Hey, let’s add to this thread and say that Mariota is so bad that he may lose his job to AJ Brown. Tie it in with the day off. It will be hysterical... Edited August 7, 2019 by japan TitanDuckFan, and Justafan 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLinks Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 Mariota’s history is relevant because this is the team that drafted him and there’s a whole side that is heavily invested in him, and it cost past coaches their jobs, mishandling him and other personnel. It’s far more valuable to the Titans for Mariota to get on course and improve this season, because it’s more confidence inspiring to the fans, the NFL, the view of the Titans within the NFL and thereby improves the team and city’s future. If it it all comes together of course. If not they have no choice. But to think they’re folding in on him now before the season has begun? Basically, success with Mariota tells better stories and makes the team more money and provides more stability long-term, versus a rookie. There’s no Mahomes 1.1 or 2.0 waiting for us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Divine Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 Had to skip 6 pages of bullshit because they gave mariota a half day. Can we talk about anything other than mariota. Like how do we think are corners are going to hold up against the talent WR core of Cleveland week one. It’s gets old with people like Oman constantly bashing mariota or the team on a daily basis. Like we get it, mariota is inconsistent and this a make or break year for him. Wish we would talk about other parts of the team other then the QB. EagleEye, and DCTitan 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoshimitsu Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 1 minute ago, XanderMXIX said: Do we know if his hand is completely healed? For all we know he may still have some nerve issues and that’s why they gave him some rest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanruss Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 4 hours ago, OILERMAN said: Point one, you specifically said earlier in the thread "Mularkey ruined him". Either he's ruined or he's not. Point two which is laughably simple and so stupid for you to mention. Tannehill wasn't ranked because Sando's article specifically said it was a ranking of "STARTING" NFL QBs. Tannehill is a back-up so he wasn't ranked. yes, i absolutely beleive mariota will not be as good at the end of his career than he would have been if we had hired someone else. his ceiling was ruined. that does not mean he cant still be very good or even great eventually if he stays healthy. LOL.. do i need to even respond to this? it's too easy. i'll give it a quick shot... - So you're saying its the 3rd year in a row Mariota is ranked above Tannehill? 55GMs dont lie!! - When do they rank 31 year old backup QB's that their team paid someone to take off their hands then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanruss Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 2 minutes ago, Soxcat said: Outside of being speculation, we can never know the truth about, it is meaningless to the situation. he asked... i clarified. its best to clarify 187 times when speaking with oman/big. he gets confused easily sees things that arent there. thoughts and opinions are what the board is about. i'll give mine whenever i damn well want thanks. TitanDuckFan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.