bizzyeddie Posted June 21, 2019 Report Share Posted June 21, 2019 1 hour ago, Number9 said: I was in LV, I usually bet the Titans win total. Easy money because the Titans tend to be underrated. This year the number is 8 wins. I couldn't pull the trigger. By the time the season starts, I'll be talking about how the Titans will beat Cleveland. But really, it's an away game and they have a good young team that's hungry. They have beat everybody in the East, no way in hell they won't fight like crazy to beat the Titans. Then @ALT, LAC,@CAR,KC,NO + IND&HOU 2 each. We are going to catch hell @OAK. But, end of August is when I drink the kool-aid. Things will look a lot better. there are 2 ways to bet it. nobody said you gotta bet the over. I'd bet the push if they would let me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number9 Posted June 21, 2019 Report Share Posted June 21, 2019 1 hour ago, bizzyeddie said: there are 2 ways to bet it. nobody said you gotta bet the over. I'd bet the push if they would let me. That's what the house is betting. The futures are for suckers who bet their home team. No pro would ever bet that shit. So, you bet 9 wins and they take the win. If they win less than 8, they pay and keep all the homers money. I don't like to bet against the Titans, ruins the games. What if they were 8-7, last game of the year and 9 wins gets them in the playoffs and you have the under? One year, I had them on a long shot to win the SB. I was going to win about 1K. Steve took them to the playoffs. So every week, I had to layoff the bet on them to lose. Ended up getting all my bets back when they lost to NE. Still I didn't win much. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bizzyeddie Posted June 21, 2019 Report Share Posted June 21, 2019 12 hours ago, Number9 said: That's what the house is betting. The futures are for suckers who bet their home team. No pro would ever bet that shit. So, you bet 9 wins and they take the win. If they win less than 8, they pay and keep all the homers money. I don't like to bet against the Titans, ruins the games. What if they were 8-7, last game of the year and 9 wins gets them in the playoffs and you have the under? One year, I had them on a long shot to win the SB. I was going to win about 1K. Steve took them to the playoffs. So every week, I had to layoff the bet on them to lose. Ended up getting all my bets back when they lost to NE. Still I didn't win much. guessing that was what...2003 playoffs..beat balt then loss to NE. So you probably bet $50 on 20-1 odds to win superbowl? you gotta ride that bet out and if you lose you lose...if you gonna hedge it you need longer odds to start with. I guessing the Titans were dogs in both of those games so the right play is to bet the Titans with points and if they lose hope they cover and you still get to win some $$. personally I think the over/under on wins is a legit bet and worth making if you think it's worth it. Odds to win the superbowl is a sucker bet especially now. Wait till after the season is half over and you still can get some good odds on teams with much more info to go off of. Number9 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted July 5, 2019 Report Share Posted July 5, 2019 So, how does this change this thread lol https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/long-time-patriots-nemesis-says-tom-brady-clear-cut-no-2-all-time-more-of-a-system-qb/&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwihjdP-sZ7jAhXBtlkKHTL9BsAQ0PADMAR6BAgDEA4&usg=AOvVaw3Zrw0K4Z0wCaSbs8dzXVmc Number9 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CreepingDeath Posted July 5, 2019 Report Share Posted July 5, 2019 28 minutes ago, Callidus said: So, how does this change this thread lol https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/long-time-patriots-nemesis-says-tom-brady-clear-cut-no-2-all-time-more-of-a-system-qb/&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwihjdP-sZ7jAhXBtlkKHTL9BsAQ0PADMAR6BAgDEA4&usg=AOvVaw3Zrw0K4Z0wCaSbs8dzXVmc Agendas don't change with new evidence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huston Posted July 5, 2019 Report Share Posted July 5, 2019 1 hour ago, Callidus said: So, how does this change this thread lol https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/long-time-patriots-nemesis-says-tom-brady-clear-cut-no-2-all-time-more-of-a-system-qb/&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwihjdP-sZ7jAhXBtlkKHTL9BsAQ0PADMAR6BAgDEA4&usg=AOvVaw3Zrw0K4Z0wCaSbs8dzXVmc Hilarious but will be over looked even though this seriously discredits the witness. Number9 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BudsOilers Posted July 5, 2019 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2019 How does Pollard saying that their #3 all-time QB on the list was better than their #1 QB change anything regarding Pollard's stance that Mariota sucks and Tannehill is better? His rational in the Manning/Brady thing, right or wrong, is based on Manning being the QB & play caller with almost complete autonomy over the game plan with two franchises as opposed to Brady. It's not like he's the only one ever to rate Manning above Brady. It's not crazy to think playing prime Peyton was probably harder to endure in a game than with Brady. 9 Nines, and Number9 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huston Posted July 5, 2019 Report Share Posted July 5, 2019 I'll confess that I actually didn't care enough to read either article was just banking on him saying something nonsensical like he normally does when given enough time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted July 5, 2019 Report Share Posted July 5, 2019 1 hour ago, BudAdams said: How does Pollard saying that their #3 all-time QB on the list was better than their #1 QB change anything regarding Pollard's stance that Mariota sucks and Tannehill is better? His rational in the Manning/Brady thing, right or wrong, is based on Manning being the QB & play caller with almost complete autonomy over the game plan with two franchises as opposed to Brady. It's not like he's the only one ever to rate Manning above Brady. It's not crazy to think playing prime Peyton was probably harder to endure in a game than with Brady. Was just the line that brady is a system qb that I thought could bring some fun to this topic. And you ruined it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
big2033 Posted July 6, 2019 Report Share Posted July 6, 2019 He actually put Peyton Manning ahead of Tom Brady as the goat qbs ... not exactly some insane take though an unpopular one at this point. OILERMAN 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted July 6, 2019 Report Share Posted July 6, 2019 7 hours ago, Callidus said: So, how does this change this thread lol https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/long-time-patriots-nemesis-says-tom-brady-clear-cut-no-2-all-time-more-of-a-system-qb/&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwihjdP-sZ7jAhXBtlkKHTL9BsAQ0PADMAR6BAgDEA4&usg=AOvVaw3Zrw0K4Z0wCaSbs8dzXVmc Did you read the thread? Pollard was blasted right out of the gate for saying Mariota would be traded, He's not getting traded, that's stupid. Although some of his points were accurate, balls sail and he can't stay healthy etc..... This thread coincided with a report from Kuharsky that Mariota was missing WRs in OTAs and the discussion was more about that than what Pollard said. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted July 6, 2019 Report Share Posted July 6, 2019 20 minutes ago, OILERMAN said: Did you read the thread? Pollard was blasted right out of the gate for saying Mariota would be traded, He's not getting traded, that's stupid. Although some of his points were accurate, balls sail and he can't stay healthy etc..... This thread coincided with a report from Kuharsky that Mariota was missing WRs in OTAs and the discussion was more about that than what Pollard said. And you missed my point. Idc where this started or ended. I was just making fun off Pollard. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted July 6, 2019 Report Share Posted July 6, 2019 Him ranking manning over brady isnt shocking to me. I feel the same. But saying Brady is a system qb is so dumb jake and envy would have to cosign for the crazy loan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanDuckFan Posted July 6, 2019 Report Share Posted July 6, 2019 1 hour ago, Callidus said: Him ranking manning over brady isnt shocking to me. I feel the same. But saying Brady is a system qb is so dumb jake and envy would have to cosign for the crazy loan. He may be. But Brady developed along with Belichick's system, of that there is no dispute. No one has ever seen Brady play outside of it. But Belichick still wins plenty of games with his choice of 2nd stringers behind center. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted July 6, 2019 Report Share Posted July 6, 2019 17 minutes ago, JakePA_Titan said: I stay dancing around in your head, don't I? I may have to start paying rent for as much time as I spend there. Was it that I mentioned you or that I mentioned you with Envy? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.