AussieTitanFan08

Update: Titans Not Picking Up Conklin's 5th year option

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Huston said:

Still waiting on the 80 rating he had this year lol.

That's on your shitty article for not being clear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, OILERMAN said:

I could see Conklin playing much better a year removed from the injury

Conklin was playing at a very high level before the injury.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/14/2019 at 8:39 PM, Huston said:

 

Superhorn also thought Locker was an accurate QB. 

 

Youre arguing against yourself on this one. Conklin in 2016 was never left on an island and was consistently given help. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Conklin wasn’t given help then why were we constantly in max protection? 

 

You cant really bitch about how bad Mularkey’s scheme was and turn around and say Conklin didn’t benefit with added blocking around him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/8/2019 at 4:44 PM, headhunter said:

Was really hoping Wilson would become a free agent and us have a go at him.

You throw the god damned vault at him. And lay out the red carpet.

 

Edited by newschool

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

Superhorn also thought Locker was an accurate QB. 

 

Youre arguing against yourself on this one. Conklin in 2016 was never left on an island and was consistently given help. 

I wasn't arguing with anyone was just bringing some more info to the topic. The guy looked at the stats and formations which dont agree with that premise. Since no one in here has actually done that I'm more inclined to lean toward his stats.

Edited by Huston

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

If Conklin wasn’t given help then why were we constantly in max protection? 

 

You cant really bitch about how bad Mularkey’s scheme was and turn around and say Conklin didn’t benefit with added blocking around him.

Why do they have to be mutually exclusive. I never said Conklin was this great player or that he was as bad as people say. I think he is an above average tackle who came back to early from injury that's it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/14/2019 at 6:14 PM, OILERMAN said:

I won't pretend to know how much the scheme helped him early on. But he was pitiful last season to the point of hurting the offensive production. He's got to be at least functional for the OL to play up to their potential 

How could he hurt O production? I though Mariota already murdered it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Huston said:

Why do they have to be mutually exclusive. I never said Conklin was this great player or that he was as bad as people say. I think he is an above average tackle who came back to early from injury that's it.

Finally something we agree on. Even PFF noted Conklin received a ton of help in 2016 however they felt the numbers showed he was so much better than other RT's that year that it didn't matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.